Advertisement

Security Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 1–2, pp 95–116 | Cite as

Adding the Temporal and Spatial Aspects of Routine Activities: A Further Test of Routine Activity Theory

  • Elizabeth R Groff
Article

Abstract

Routine activity theory identifies the routine activities of individuals as important to understanding the convergence of elements necessary for a crime to occur. Two recent studies have demonstrated how geographically aware agent-based models can be used to provide a virtual rather than empirical laboratory for testing theory. Those studies trace the development of three versions of a basic street robbery model with different representations of routine activities (random, temporal constraints, and spatio-temporal constraints). This research uses the existing model to test whether the core premise of routine activity theory (i.e., as time away from home increases so will street robbery) holds true under the different versions of activity spaces. The findings indicate that temporal and spatial constraints have separate and unequal influences on the incidence of crime. These results substantiate the key role of spatio-temporal constraints in determining the opportunities for and incidence of street robbery events.

Keywords

theory testing simulation agent-based models geographic information systems activity spaces 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by the Grant 2005-IJ-CX-0015 from the National Institute of Justice. The author wishes to thank the anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

  1. Akers, R.L. (2000) Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and Application. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, J. (2005) A New Age for Geosimulation. Transactions in GIS. Vol. 9, No. 4, pp 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An, L., Linderman, M., Qi, J., Shortridge, A. and Liu, J. (2005) Exploring Complexity in a Human-Environment System: An Agent-Based Spatial Model for Multidisciplinary and Multiscale Integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Vol. 95, No. 1, pp 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Axelrod, R. (2006) Simulation in the Social Sciences. In Rennard, J.-P. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Nature Inspired Computing for Economy and Management, Vol. 1, Hershey PA: Idea Group, pp 90–100.Google Scholar
  5. Axtell, R. (2000) Why Agents? On the Varied Motivations for Agent Computing in the Social Sciences. The Brookings Institution. Retrieved 11/5/2004, 2004, from the World Wide Web: http://www.brook.edu/es/dynamics/papers/agents/agents.pdf.Google Scholar
  6. Bonabeau, E. (2002) Agent-Based Modeling: Methods and Techniques for Simulating Human Systems. Paper presented at the Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Brantingham, P. and Brantingham, P. (eds) (1981a) Introduction to the 1991 Reissue: Notes on Environmental Criminology. Environmental Criminology. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press Inc., pp 1–6.Google Scholar
  8. Brantingham, P. and Brantingham, P. (eds) (1981b) Notes on the Geometry of Crime.Environmental Criminology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc., pp 27–54.Google Scholar
  9. Brantingham, P.J. and Brantingham, P.L. (1984) Patterns in Crime. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Brantingham, P.L. and Brantingham, P.J. (1993) Nodes, Paths and Edges: Considerations on the Complexity of Crime and the Physical Environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 13, pp 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brantingham, P.L. and Brantingham, P.J. (2004) Computer Simulation as a Tool for Environmental Criminologists. Security Journal. Vol. 17, No. 1, pp 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brantingham, P.L. and Groff, E.R. (2004) The Future of Agent-Based Simulation in Environmental Criminology. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, D.G., Riolo, R., Robinson, D.T., North, M. and Rand, W. (2005) Spatial Process and Data Models: Toward Integration of Agent-Based Models and GIS. Journal of Geographic Systems. Vol. 7, pp 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2003) Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment: January 2003. Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor. Retrieved, 2006, from the World Wide Web:www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/metro_03262003.pdf.
  15. Chattoe, E. (1996) Why Are We Simulating Anyway? Some Answers From Economics.In Troitzsch, K.G., Mueller, U., Gilbert, G.N. & Doran J.E. (eds) Social Science Microsimulation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen, B., Cunningham, A., Ewing, R., Peralta, R. and Visser, E. (1994) Two-Dimensional Modeling of Microscale Transport and Biotransformation in Porous Media. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Vol. 10, No. 1, pp 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarke, R.V. and Cornish, D.B. (1985) Modeling Offender's Decisions: A Framework for Research and Policy. In Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds) Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Volume 6. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Clarke, R.V. and Cornish, D.B. (2001) Rational Choice. In Paternoster, R. and Bachman, R. (eds) Explaining Criminals and Crime. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Co., pp 23–42.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, L.E. and Felson, M. (1979) Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review. Vol. 44, pp 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cornish, D.B. and Clarke, R.V. (1986) Introduction. In Cornish, D. B. and Clarke, R. V. (eds) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dibble, C. (2001) Theory in a Complex World: GeoGraph Computational Laboratories. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  22. Dibble, C. (Unpublished paper) Theory in a Complex World: GeoGraph Computational Laboratories.Google Scholar
  23. Dowling, D. (1999) Experimenting on Theories. Science in Context. Vol. 12, No. 2, pp 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eck, J.E. (1995) Examining Routine Activity Theory: A Review of Two Books. Justice Quarterly. Vol. 12, No. 4, pp 783–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eck, J.E. (2005) Using Crime Pattern Simulations to Elaborate Theory. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Toronto.Google Scholar
  26. Eck, J.E. and Liu, L. (2004) Routine Activity Theory in a RA/CA Crime Simulation. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  27. Epstein, J.M. and Axtell, R. (1996) Growing Artificial Societies. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  28. ESRI (2003) Business Location Data. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
  29. ESRI (2005) ArcGIS 9.1. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Felson, M. (1986) Linking Criminal Choices, Routine Activities, Informal Control, and Criminal Outcomes. In Cornish, D. B. and Clarke, R. V. (eds) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilbert, N. and Doran, J. (eds) (1994) Simulating Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gilbert, N. and Terna, P. (1999) How to Build and Use Agent-based Models in Social Science. Discussion Paper. Retrieved 9/30/2003, 2003, from the World Wide Web:http://web.econ.unito.it/terna/deposito/gil_ter.pdf.
  33. Gilbert, N. and Troitzsch, K.G. (1999) Simulation for the Social Scientist. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Golledge, R.G. (1983) Models of Man, Points of View, and Theory in Social Science. Geographical Analysis. Vol. 15, No. 1, pp 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Groff, E.R. (2007a) Simulation for Theory Testing and Experimentation: An Example Using Routine Activity Theory and Street Robbery. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Vol. 23, No. 2, pp 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Groff, E.R. (2007b) “Situating” Simulation to Model Human Spatio-Temporal Interactions: An Example Using Crime Events. Transactions in GIS. Vol. 11, No. 4, pp 507–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Groff, E.R. (2007c) Spatio-Temporal Aspects of Routine Activities and the Distribution of Street Robbery. In Liu, L. and Eck, J. (eds) Artificial Crime Analysis Systems: Using Computer Simulations and Geographic Information Systems. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  38. Harvey, D. (1969) Explanation in Geography. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Huisman, O. and Forer, P. (1998) Computational Agents and Urban Life Spaces: A Preliminary Realization of the Time–Geography of Student Lifestyles. Paper presented at the GeoComputation 98, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
  40. Jeffery, C.R. (1971) Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Lempert, R. (2002) Agent-Based Modeling as Organizational and Public Policy Simulators. Paper presented at the Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
  42. Liu, L., Wang, X., Eck, J. and Liang, J. (2005) Simulating Crime Events and Crime Patterns in RA/CA Model. In Wang, F. (ed) Geographic Information Systems and Crime Analysis. Singapore: Idea Group. pp 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Macy, M.W. and Willer, R. (2002) From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 28, pp 143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Newman, O. (1972) Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Newton, R.R. and Rudestam, K.E. (1999) Your Statistical Consultant: Answers to Your Data Analysis Questions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. North, M.J., Collier, N.T. and Vos, J.R. (2006) Experiences Creating Three Implementations of the Repast Agent Modeling Toolkit. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ostrom, T.M. (1988) Computer Simulation: The Third Symbol System. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Vol. 24, pp 381–392.Google Scholar
  48. O’Sullivan, D. and Haklay, M. (2000) Agent-Based Models and Individualism: Is the World Agent-Based? Environment and Planning A. Vol. 32, No. 8, pp 1409–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parker, D.C., Berger, T. and Manson, S.M. (2001) Agent-Based Models of Land-Use/Land-Cover Change in LUCC Report Series No. 6: LUCC Focus 1 Office Anthropological Center for Training and Research on Global Environmental Change, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  50. Ratcliffe, J.H. (2006) A Temporal Constraint Theory to Explain Opportunity-based Spatial Offending Patterns. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. Vol. 6, No. 3, pp 261–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reppetto, T.A. (1976) Crime Prevention Through Environmental Policy: “A Critique”. American Behavioral Scientist. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ropella, G.E., Railsback, S.F. and Jackson, S.K. (2002) Software Engineering Considerations for Individual-Based Models. Natural Resource Modeling. Vol. 15, No. 1, pp 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schelling, T.C. (1971) Dynamic Models of Segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. Vol. 1, pp 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shannon, D.M. and Davenport, M.A. (2001) Using SPSS to Solve Statistical Problems: A Self-Instruction Guide. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  55. Slavin, E. (1996) An Integrated, Dynamic Approach to Travel Demand Forecasting. Transportation. Vol. 23, No. 3, pp 313–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tesfatsion, L. (2001) Guest Editorial Agent-Based Modeling of Evolutionary Economic Systems. Computation. Vol. 5, No. 5, pp 437–441.Google Scholar
  57. U.S. Census Bureau (Cartographer) (2000) Census 2000: Summary Tape File 1 (SF1).Google Scholar
  58. U.S. Census Bureau. (2002) County Business Patterns. U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved, from the World Wide Web:http://censtats.census.gov/cbpnaic/cbpnaic.shtml.
  59. Visher, C A and Roth, J.A. (1986) Participation in Criminal Careers. In Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., and Visher, C. A. (eds) Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals”. Vol. I. Washington DC: National Academy Press, pp 211–229.Google Scholar
  60. Walsh, D. (1986) Victim Selection Procedures Among Economic Criminals: The Rational Choice Perspective. In Cornish, D. B. and Clarke, R. V. (eds) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xue, Y. and Brown, D.E. (2003) A Decision Model for Spatial Site Selection by Criminals: A Foundation for Law Enforcement Decision Support. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Cybernetics – Part C: Applications and Reviews. Vol. 33, No. 1, pp 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth R Groff
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of MarylandAlexandria

Personalised recommendations