Security Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 1–2, pp 58–76 | Cite as

Near-Repeat Patterns in Philadelphia Shootings

Article

Abstract

Research from property crime studies has identified a near-repeat phenomenon, where the risk of repeat burglary victimization is transmitted from a burgled location to nearby locations for a limited amount of time. This article explores the potential for near-repeat patterns to exist in another crime type, specifically the incidence of shootings. Using new tools developed to quantify the spatio-temporal patterns of near-repeats, a study in Philadelphia, U.S.A. finds that there are elevated patterns of near-repeat shootings within 2 weeks and one city block of previous incidents. The elevated risk of a shooting during this period is found to be 33 per cent greater than expected. It is speculated that possible reasons include coercion, retaliation and escalation. Given that the study takes place against the backdrop of a police operation to mitigate retaliatory shootings, the potential for using this information to influence crime prevention policy is discussed.

Keywords

violence communicability of risk near-repeats shootings Philadelphia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Deputy Commissioner Patricia Giorgio-Fox of the Philadelphia Police Department for generous provision of the data and comments on an earlier draft of this paper, and Tony Luongo for his assistance with geocoding. This research was funded by a British Academy International Collaborative Network award and from the Research Incentive Fund and the Institute of Public Affairs at Temple University. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Philadelphia Police Department.

References

  1. Anderson, E. (1999) Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  2. Baumer, E. (2002) Neighborhood Disadvantage and Police Notification by Victims of Violence. Criminology. Vol. 40, pp 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Besag, J. and Diggle, P.J. (1977) Simple Monte Carlo Tests for Spatial Pattern. Applied Statistics. Vol. 26, pp 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumstein, A. (1995) Youth Violence, Guns, and the Illicit-Drug Industry. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Vol. 86, pp 10–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowers, K.J., Hirschfield, A. and Johnson, S.D. (1998) Victimization Revisited. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 38, pp 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowers, K.J. and Johnson, S.D. (2004) Who Commits Near Repeats? A Test of the Boost Explanation. Western Criminology Review. Vol. 5, No.3, pp 12–24.Google Scholar
  7. Chainey, S. and Ratcliffe, J.H. (2005) GIS and Crime Mapping. London: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Courtwright, D. (1996) Violent Land: Single Men and Social Disorder from the Frontier to the Inner City. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Diggle, P.J., Chetwynd, A.G. and Haggkvist, R. (1995) Second-Order Analysis of Space–Time Clustering. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Vol. 4, pp 124–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farrell, G. and Pease, K. (1993) Once Bitten, Twice Bitten: Repeat Victimisation and its Implications for Crime Prevention Police Research Group: Crime Prevention Unit Series Paper 46.Google Scholar
  11. Firman, J.R. (2003) Deconstructing CompStat to clarify its intent. Criminology and Public Policy. Vol. 2, pp 457–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grabosky, P. (1995) Counterproductive Crime Prevention. In Crime Prevention Conference 1994. Brisbane: Centre for Crime Policy and Public Safety, Griffith University, pp 151–165.Google Scholar
  13. Grabosky, P. (1996) Unintended Consequences of Crime Prevention. In Homel, R. (ed.) Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 5, Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  14. Harries, K. (1996) Serious Violence: Patterns of Homicide and Assault in America, 2nd edn.Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobs, B. and Wright, R. (1999) Stick-Up, Street Culture, and Offender Motivation. Criminology. Vol. 37, pp 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobs, B.A., Topalli, V. and Wright, R. (2000) Managing Retaliation: Drug Robbery and Informal Sanction Threats. Criminology. Vol. 38, pp 171–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, S.D. and Bowers, K.J. (2004a) The Burglary as Clue to the Future: The Beginnings of Prospective Hot-Spotting. European Journal of Criminology. Vol. 1, pp 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, S.D. and Bowers, K.J. (2004b) The Stability of Space–Time Clusters of Burglary. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 44, No. 1, pp 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knox, E.G. (1964) Epidemiology of Childhood Leukaemia in Northumberland and Durham. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine. Vol. 18, pp 17–24.Google Scholar
  20. Lawton, B.A., Taylor, R.B. and Luongo, A.J. (2005) Police Officers on Drug Corners in Philadelphia, Drug Crime, and Violent Crime: Intended, Diffusion, and Displacement Impacts. Justice Quarterly. Vol. 22, pp 427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ley, D. (1974) The Black Inner City as Frontier Outpost. Washington, DC: The Association of American Geographers.Google Scholar
  22. Massey, D. and Denton, N. (1993) American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. McDonald, P.P. (2002) Managing Police Operations: Implementing the New York Crime Control Model – CompStat. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, M.H. (2003) Sizing up CompStat: An Important Administrative Innovation in Policing. Criminology and Public Policy. Vol. 2, pp 469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moore, M.H. and Braga, A.A. (2003) Measuring and Improving Police Performance: The Lessons of Compstat and its Progeny. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management. Vol. 26, pp 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mullins, C., Wright, R. and Jacobs, B. (2004) Gender, Streetlife and Criminal Retaliation. Criminology. Vol. 42, pp 911–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nettler, G. (1982) Killing One Another. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  28. Ousey, G. and Augustine, M. (2001) Young Guns: Examining Alternative Explanations of Juvenile Firearm Homicide Rates. Criminology. Vol. 39, pp 933–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Polvi, N., Looman, T., Humphries, C. and Pease, K. (1991) The Time Course of Repeat Burglary Victimization. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 31, pp 411–414.Google Scholar
  30. Rengert, G. (1996) The Geography of Illegal Drugs. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rengert, G., Ratcliffe, J.H. and Chakravorty, S. (2005) Policing Illegal Drug Markets: Geographic Approaches to Crime Reduction. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S. and Earls, F. (1997) Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy. Science. Vol. 277, pp 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegel, L. (2007) Criminology: Theories, Patterns, and Typologies. Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  34. Sherman, L.W. (1990) Police Crackdowns: Initial and Residual Deterrence. In Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds) Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research. Vol. 12 Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp 1–48.Google Scholar
  35. Sherman, L.W., Shaw, J.W. and Rogan, D.P. (1995) The Kansas City Gun Experiment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  36. Singer, S. (1986) Victims of Serious Violence and Their Criminal Behavior: Subcultural Theory and Beyond. Violence and Victims. Vol. 1, pp 61–70.Google Scholar
  37. Stewart, E. and Simons, R. (2006) Structure and Culture in African American Adolescent Violence: A Partial Test of the “Code of the Street” Thesis. Justice Quarterly. Vol. 23, pp 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Townsley, M., Homel, R. and Chaseling, J. (2000) Repeat Burglary Victimisation: Spatial and Temporal Patterns. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. Vol. 33, pp 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Townsley, M., Homel, R. and Chaseling, J. (2003) Infectious Burglaries: A Test of the Near Repeat Hypothesis. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 43, pp 61–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walsh, W.F. (2001) Compstat: An Analysis of an Emerging Police Managerial Paradigm. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management. Vol. 24, pp 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weiner, N., Zahn, M. and Sagi, R. (1990) Violence: Patterns, Causes, Public Policy. NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeTemple University, Gladfelter HallPhiladelphiaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations