The Journey to Crime: Victims and Offenders Converge in Violent Index Offences in Chicago
- 81 Downloads
In Chicago, most non-lethal violence occurs close to the home of the victim or offender. This research describes the distance between the home of the victim and offender and their meeting in a violent crime. Analysis includes all UCR Index criminal sexual assaults, robberies, and aggravated assaults recorded by the Chicago Police in 1998. Little evidence is found for a zone of reduced crime around the home address of the offender. Predatory violence was most likely to occur in neighbourhoods where many offenders resided. Women were much more likely to be attacked close to their and the offender's home than men. Distance, location, and neighbourhood reflected the routine activities of victims and offender as they converged in a violent incident.
Keywordstravel robbery rape assault Chicago
- Amir, M. (1971) Patterns in Forcible Rape. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp 87–95.Google Scholar
- Bernasco, W. and Luykx, F. (2002) Using Random Utility Models to Explain Location Choice of Offenders. Sixth Annual International Crime Mapping Research Conference. Denver, CO.Google Scholar
- Bernasco, W. and Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005) How Do Residential Burglars Select Target Areas: A New Approach to the Analysis of Location Choice. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 44, pp 296–315.Google Scholar
- Block, R. and Block, C.R. (1999) Risky Places: A Comparison of the Environs of Rapid Transit Stations in Chicago and the Bronx. In Mollenkopf, J. (ed.) Analyzing Crime Patterns: Frontiers of Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
- Brantingham, P. and Brantingham, P.J. (1984) Patterns in Crime. New York: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
- Brantingham, P. and Brantingham, P.J. (1990) Environmental Criminology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
- Brantingham, P. and Brantingham, P.J. (1999) A Theoretical Model of Crime Hot Spot Generation. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp 7–26.Google Scholar
- Burgess, E.W. (1925) The Growth of the City. In Park, R., Burgess, E., and McKenzie, R. (eds.) The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp 47–62.Google Scholar
- Cambridge Systematics (1997) Time-of-Day Modeling Procedures: State-of-the-Practice, State-of-the-Art: Final Report. Federal Highway Administration. Available from: http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/clearinghouse/docs/Time-Day/.
- Center for Investigative Psychology (2003) Dragnet. Available from: http://www.i-psy.com/publications/publications_dragnet.php.
- Felson, M . (1998) Crime and Everyday Life. 2nd Edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
- Durkheim, E. (1964) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Groff, E.R. (2002) Modeling the Spatial Dynamics of Homicide. MAPS Conference. Denver, CO. Available from: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/maps/Conferences/02conf/Groff.ppt.
- Groff, E. and McEwen, J.T. (2005) Disaggregating the Journey to Homicide. In Wang, F. (ed.) Geographic Information Systems and Crime Analysis. Hershey PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
- van Koppen, P., de Poot, C.J. and van Koppen, M.V. (2000) Cirkels van Delicten: Over pleegplaatsen van misdrijven en de woonplaats van de daders (Circles of Crime: Incident Locations and the Residences of the Offenders). De Psycholoog: Psychologie en Recht (The Psychologist: Psychology and Law). Vol. 35, pp 435–442.Google Scholar
- van Koppen, P.J., van der Kemp, J.J. and de Poot, C.J. (2002) Geografische daderprofilering (Geographic Offender Profiling). In van Koppen et al. (eds.) Het recht van binnen: Psychologie van het recht (The Law from Inside: Psychology of the Law). Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- LeBeau, J.L. (1987) Geographic Distance and the Rapist's Method of Approaching the Victim. Journal of Police Science and Administration. Vol. 15, No. 2, pp 129–161.Google Scholar
- Lenz, R. (1986) Geographical and temporal changes among robberies in milwaukee. In: R.M. Figlio, S. Hakim. and G.F. Rengert (eds.) Metropolitan crime patterns. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 97–115.Google Scholar
- Levine, N. (2005) CrimeStat: Version 3.0: Spatial Statistics Program for the Analysis of Crime Locations. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
- Messner, S. and Tardiff, K. (1986) The Social Ecology of Urban Homicide: An Application of the ‘Routine Activities Approach’. Criminology. Vol. 22, pp 241–267.Google Scholar
- Normandeau, A. (1968) Trends and Patterns in Robbery: Philadelphia, PA, 1960–66. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Ortuzar, J.D. and Willumsen, L. (2001) Modeling Transport. Chichester, England: J John Wiley Ltd, pp 2–24.Google Scholar
- Papachristos, A. (2003) The Social Structure of Gang Homicides in Chicago. Denver, CO: American Society of Criminology.Google Scholar
- Pyle, G.F., Hanten, E.W., Williams, P.G., Pearson II, A.L, Doyle, J.G. and Kwofie, K. (1974) The Spatial Dynamics of Crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp 103–180.Google Scholar
- Rand, A. (1986) Mobility Triangles. In. Figlio, R. M., Hakim, S. and Rengert, G. (eds.) Metropolitan Crime Patterns. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press, pp 117–126.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, W. and Conly, C. (1981) Crime and Mobility: An Empirical Study. In Brantingham, P. and Brantingham, P. (eds.) Environmental Criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp 167–188.Google Scholar
- Rossmo, D.K. (2000) Geographic Profiling. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Wiles, P. and Costello, A. (2000) The Road to Nowhere: The Evidence for Traveling Criminals. Home Office Research Study No. 207 London: Home Office.Google Scholar
- Wright, R.T. and Decker, S.D. (1997) Armed Robbers in Action: Stickups and Street Culture. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar