Security Journal

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 123–137 | Cite as

The Journey to Crime: Victims and Offenders Converge in Violent Index Offences in Chicago

  • Richard Block
  • Aneta Galary
  • Darryl Brice
Article

Abstract

In Chicago, most non-lethal violence occurs close to the home of the victim or offender. This research describes the distance between the home of the victim and offender and their meeting in a violent crime. Analysis includes all UCR Index criminal sexual assaults, robberies, and aggravated assaults recorded by the Chicago Police in 1998. Little evidence is found for a zone of reduced crime around the home address of the offender. Predatory violence was most likely to occur in neighbourhoods where many offenders resided. Women were much more likely to be attacked close to their and the offender's home than men. Distance, location, and neighbourhood reflected the routine activities of victims and offender as they converged in a violent incident.

Keywords

travel robbery rape assault Chicago 

References

  1. Amir, M. (1971) Patterns in Forcible Rape. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp 87–95.Google Scholar
  2. Anselin, L. (2005) Exploring Spatial Data with GeoDa: A Workbook. Santa Barbara: Center for Spatially Integrated Social Statistics. University of California, Available from: https://www.geoda.uiuc.edu/pdf/geodaworkbook.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. Bernasco, W. and Luykx, F. (2002) Using Random Utility Models to Explain Location Choice of Offenders. Sixth Annual International Crime Mapping Research Conference. Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  4. Bernasco, W. and Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005) How Do Residential Burglars Select Target Areas: A New Approach to the Analysis of Location Choice. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 44, pp 296–315.Google Scholar
  5. Block, R. and Block, C.R. (1999) Risky Places: A Comparison of the Environs of Rapid Transit Stations in Chicago and the Bronx. In Mollenkopf, J. (ed.) Analyzing Crime Patterns: Frontiers of Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Brantingham, P. and Brantingham, P.J. (1984) Patterns in Crime. New York: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Brantingham, P. and Brantingham, P.J. (1990) Environmental Criminology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brantingham, P. and Brantingham, P.J. (1999) A Theoretical Model of Crime Hot Spot Generation. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp 7–26.Google Scholar
  9. Burgess, E.W. (1925) The Growth of the City. In Park, R., Burgess, E., and McKenzie, R. (eds.) The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp 47–62.Google Scholar
  10. Cambridge Systematics (1997) Time-of-Day Modeling Procedures: State-of-the-Practice, State-of-the-Art: Final Report. Federal Highway Administration. Available from: http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/clearinghouse/docs/Time-Day/.
  11. Canter, D.V. and Gregory, A. (1994) Identifying the Residential Location of Rapists. Journal of the Forensic Science Society. Vol. 34, No. 3, pp 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Capone, D.L. and Nichols, W.W. (1976) Urban structure and criminal mobility. American Behavioral Scientist 20: 119–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Center for Investigative Psychology (2003) Dragnet. Available from: http://www.i-psy.com/publications/publications_dragnet.php.
  14. Cornish, D. and Clarke, R. (1986) The Reasoning Criminal. New York: Spring Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Felson, M . (1998) Crime and Everyday Life. 2nd Edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  16. Durkheim, E. (1964) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Groff, E.R. (2002) Modeling the Spatial Dynamics of Homicide. MAPS Conference. Denver, CO. Available from: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/maps/Conferences/02conf/Groff.ppt.
  18. Groff, E. and McEwen, J.T. (2005) Disaggregating the Journey to Homicide. In Wang, F. (ed.) Geographic Information Systems and Crime Analysis. Hershey PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. van Koppen, P., de Poot, C.J. and van Koppen, M.V. (2000) Cirkels van Delicten: Over pleegplaatsen van misdrijven en de woonplaats van de daders (Circles of Crime: Incident Locations and the Residences of the Offenders). De Psycholoog: Psychologie en Recht (The Psychologist: Psychology and Law). Vol. 35, pp 435–442.Google Scholar
  20. van Koppen, P.J. and de Keijser, J.W. (1997) Desisting Distance Decay: On the Aggregation of Individual Crime Trips. Criminology. Vol. 35, No. 3, pp 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. van Koppen, P.J. and Jansen, R.W.J. (1998) The Road to Robbery: Travel Patterns in Commercial Robberies. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 38, No. 2, pp 230–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Koppen, P.J., van der Kemp, J.J. and de Poot, C.J. (2002) Geografische daderprofilering (Geographic Offender Profiling). In van Koppen et al. (eds.) Het recht van binnen: Psychologie van het recht (The Law from Inside: Psychology of the Law). Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  23. LeBeau, J.L. (1987) Geographic Distance and the Rapist's Method of Approaching the Victim. Journal of Police Science and Administration. Vol. 15, No. 2, pp 129–161.Google Scholar
  24. Lenz, R. (1986) Geographical and temporal changes among robberies in milwaukee. In: R.M. Figlio, S. Hakim. and G.F. Rengert (eds.) Metropolitan crime patterns. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 97–115.Google Scholar
  25. Levine, N. (2005) CrimeStat: Version 3.0: Spatial Statistics Program for the Analysis of Crime Locations. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  26. Lind, A.W. (1930) Some Ecological Patterns of Community Disorganization in Honolulu. American Journal of Sociology.. Vol. 36, No. 2, pp 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Messner, S. and Tardiff, K. (1986) The Social Ecology of Urban Homicide: An Application of the ‘Routine Activities Approach’. Criminology. Vol. 22, pp 241–267.Google Scholar
  28. Normandeau, A. (1968) Trends and Patterns in Robbery: Philadelphia, PA, 1960–66. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  29. Ortuzar, J.D. and Willumsen, L. (2001) Modeling Transport. Chichester, England: J John Wiley Ltd, pp 2–24.Google Scholar
  30. Papachristos, A. (2003) The Social Structure of Gang Homicides in Chicago. Denver, CO: American Society of Criminology.Google Scholar
  31. Pyle, G.F., Hanten, E.W., Williams, P.G., Pearson II, A.L, Doyle, J.G. and Kwofie, K. (1974) The Spatial Dynamics of Crime. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp 103–180.Google Scholar
  32. Rand, A. (1986) Mobility Triangles. In. Figlio, R. M., Hakim, S. and Rengert, G. (eds.) Metropolitan Crime Patterns. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press, pp 117–126.Google Scholar
  33. Rhodes, W. and Conly, C. (1981) Crime and Mobility: An Empirical Study. In Brantingham, P. and Brantingham, P. (eds.) Environmental Criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp 167–188.Google Scholar
  34. Rossmo, D.K. (2000) Geographic Profiling. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  35. Warren, J., Reboussin, R., Hazelwood, R.R., Cummings, A., Gibbs, N. and Trumbetta, S. (1998) Crime Scene and Distance Correlates of Serial Rape. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Vol. 14, No. 1, pp 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wiles, P. and Costello, A. (2000) The Road to Nowhere: The Evidence for Traveling Criminals. Home Office Research Study No. 207 London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  37. White, R.C. (1932) The Relationship of Felonies to Environmental Factors in Indianapolis. Social Forces. Vol. 10, No. 4, pp 488–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wright, R.T. and Decker, S.D. (1997) Armed Robbers in Action: Stickups and Street Culture. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Block
    • 1
  • Aneta Galary
    • 1
  • Darryl Brice
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyLoyola University Chicago, 6525 NChicago,U.S.A.
  2. 2.Sociology DepartmentHighline Community CollegeDes MoinesU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations