Security Journal

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 111–122 | Cite as

New Car Security and Shifting Vehicle Theft Patterns in Australia

  • Sophie Kriven
  • Emma Ziersch
Article

Abstract

Motor vehicle security has improved considerably in the past decade, both in Australia and other developed countries, and from July 2001 all new passenger vehicles sold in Australia were required to be fitted with an Australian Standard engine immobilizer prior to sale. Although little formal evaluation of the effect of engine immobilizers has been undertaken, Brown and Thomas investigated the effect of a similar initiative introduced in the European Union in 1998. They found that in the U.K., immobilizers were effective in reducing vehicle theft rates, but also that there was some evidence of a displacement in thefts towards older, non-immobilized vehicles. This study replicates the method of Brown and Thomas using Australian data from the National Comprehensive Auto-theft Research System Project, and shows that immobilizers are associated with a strong decline in motor vehicle theft in Australia in recent years. There is also some evidence of displacement towards older vehicles, particularly for unrecovered thefts. Improvements in vehicle security are thought to account for this displacement among newer vehicles, but it is not clear what accounts for this shift among older vehicles. Some potential causes are discussed.

Keywords

car vehicle theft immobilizer crime 

References

  1. Brown, R. (2004) The Effectiveness of Electronic Immobilization: Changing Patterns of Temporary and Permanent Vehicle Theft. In: Maxfield, M. and Clarke, R. (eds.) Understanding and preventing Car Theft. Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 11 Monsey, NY, USA: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, R. and Thomas, N. (2003) Aging Vehicles: Evidence of the Effectiveness of New car Security from the Home Office Car Theft Index. Security Journal. Vol. 16, No. 3, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CARS (Comprehensive Auto-theft Research System) (2001) Quarterly Report on Vehicle Theft in Australia, March 2001. National CARS Project, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  4. CARS (Comprehensive Auto-theft Research System) (2005a) Quarterly Report on Vehicle Theft in Australia, September 2005. Adelaide, Australia: National CARS Project.Google Scholar
  5. CARS (Comprehensive Auto-theft Research System) (2005b) 2004/2005 Annual Statistical Report CD-ROM. National CARS Project, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Lee, A., Wyndham, T. and Fairman, T. (2006) Case Study – Reducing Theft of Old Cars: Raising Levels Of Investment in Car Immobilizers. In: Economic and Resource Analysis Strategic Policy Team (ed.) Changing Behaviour to Prevent Crime: An Incentives-Based Approach. UK: Home Office.Google Scholar
  7. Levesley, T., Braun, G., Wilkinson, M. and Powell, C. (2004) Emerging Methods of Car Theft – Theft of Keys. London: Home Office Findings No. 239. Home Office.Google Scholar
  8. Metal Bulletin website (2005) Accessed on 12th June 2005. 〈 http://www.metalbulletin.com 〉.
  9. Potter, R. and Thomas, P. (2001) Engine Immobilisers: How Effective are They? Adelaide, Australia: National CARS Project.Google Scholar
  10. Sallybanks, J. and Brown, R. (1999) Vehicle Crime Reduction: Turning the Corner, Police Research Series Paper No. 119. London, UK: Home Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie Kriven
    • 1
  • Emma Ziersch
    • 1
  1. 1.National CARS Project, Office of Crime Statistics and ResearchAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations