Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 10, Issue 1–2, pp 108–129 | Cite as

Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community

  • Martijn R Van Der Horst
  • Peter W De LangenEmail author


Many different private companies – shipping lines, terminal operating companies, forwarders, hinterland transport providers, and inland terminal operators – are involved in hinterland transport. In addition, different public actors such as the port authority, customs, and infrastructure managers are involved. Creating effective hinterland transport chains requires the coordination between all these actors; coordination does not come about spontaneously. Its development may be hindered by free-riding problems, a lack of contractual relationships, information asymmetry, and a lack of incentives for cooperation. This paper presents analyses of the coordination problems in hinterland chains of seaports and arrangements to resolve these problems. The most relevant coordination problems in hinterland chains are discussed. Based on insights from institutional economics, four main categories of arrangements to improve coordination are identified: the introduction of incentives, the creation of an interfirm alliance, changing the scope of the organisation, and collective action. An analysis is presented of a substantial number of coordination arrangements in hinterland transport to and from the port of Rotterdam, thereby indicating how coordination could be improved.


Hinterland transport coordination seaports Rotterdam institutional economics 


  1. Ballou, RH . 2004: Business logistics: Planning, organizing and controlling the supply chain. 5th edition. Pearson Education: Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
  2. Bundesamt für Güterverkehr. 2005: Marktbeobachtung Güterverkehr, Sonderbericht zum Seehafen-Hinterlandverkehr. Bundesamt für Güterverkehr: Köln.Google Scholar
  3. Coase, RH . 1937: The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coase, RH . 1960: The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Langen, PW . 2004: The performance of seaport clusters, a framework to analyze cluster performance and an application to the seaport clusters of Durban, Rotterdam, and the Lower Mississippi, Rotterdam. Erasmus Research Institute of Management Ph.D. series, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  6. De Langen, PW and Chouly, A . 2004: Hinterland access regimes in seaports. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 4: 361–380.Google Scholar
  7. Demsetz . 1967: Towards a theory of property rights. American Economic Review 57: 347.Google Scholar
  8. Groothedde, B . 2005: Collaborative logistics and transportation networks: A modeling approach to hub network design. Trail-Thesis Series T2005/15, Trail, Delft.Google Scholar
  9. Halldorsson, A, Kotzab, H, Mikkola, JH and Skjott-Larsen, T . 2005: How inter-organisational theories contribute to supply chain management, theoretical foundation and application. In: De Koster, R ànd Delfmann, W (eds) Supply Chain Management in European Perspective. Copenhagen Business School: Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  10. Heaver, T, Meersman, H, Moglia, F and Voorde, E van de . 2000: Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition? Maritime Policy & management 27: 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Konings, JW . 1996: Integrated centers for the transshipment, storage, collection and distribution of goods: A survey of the possibilities of a high quality intermodal transport concept. Transport Policy 3: 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Konings, JW . 2005: Foldable containers to reduce the costs of empty transport? A cost-benefit analysis from a Chain and multi-actor perspective. Maritime Economics and Logistics 7: 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Midoro, R, Musso, E and Parola, F . 2005: Maritime liner shipping and the stevedoring industry: Market structure and competition strategies. Maritime Policy and Management 32: 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moonen, H, Van der Rakt, Miller, I, Van Nunen, J and Van Hillegersberg, J . 2005: Agent technology supports inter-organizational planning in the port. Erasmus Research Institute of Management: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  15. Nieuwsblad Transport. 2007: Maersk stapt in inland terminals. Nieuwblad Transport, 24 January 2007.Google Scholar
  16. Nooteboom, B . 1992: Towards a dynamic theory of transactions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2: 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nooteboom, B . 2004: Inter-firm collaboration, learning and networks: An integrated approach. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  18. Notteboom, T and Konings, R . 2003: Organisational changes in the European barging industry and its impact on the barging network. Paper presented at Research Seminar Maritime Transport, Globalisation, Regional Integration and Territorial Development, Le Havre, June 2003.Google Scholar
  19. Notteboom, T and Winkelmans, W . 2004: Factual report on the European port sector: FR-WP1: Overall market dynamics and their influence on the port sector. European Sea Ports Organisation (ESPO): Brussels.Google Scholar
  20. Notteboom, TE and Rodrigue, JP . 2005: Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy & Management 32: 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Panayides, PM . 2002: Economic organization of intermodal transport. Transport Reviews 22: 401–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Port of Rotterdam. 2003: Bereikbaarheid van het haven- en industriecomplex. Port of Rotterdam: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  23. Robinson, R . 2002: Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: The new paradigm. Maritime Policy & Management 29: 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stichting RIL. 1998: Afhandeling Containerbinnenvaart Rotterdam. RIL Working document: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  25. Williamson, OE . 1975: Markets and hierarchies. MacMillan: New York.Google Scholar
  26. Williamson, OE . 1996: The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PortTransport and Regional Economics, Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department Corporate StrategyPort of Rotterdam AuthorityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations