Journal of the Operational Research Society

, Volume 57, Issue 7, pp 766–768

Where next for problem structuring methods

  • C Eden
  • F Ackermann
Viewpoint

References

  1. Ackermann F (1996). Participants' perceptions on the role of facilitators using group decision support systems. Group Dec Negot 5: 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackermann F and Eden C (2005). Using causal mapping to support information systems development: some considerations. In: Narayanan VK and Armstrong D (eds). Causal Mapping for Research in Information Technology. Idea Group Inc., PA, USA, pp 259–279.Google Scholar
  3. Ackermann F, Eden C and Williams T (1997). Modeling for litigation: mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches. Interfaces 27(2): 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackermann F, Eden C and Brown I (2005). The Practice of Making Strategy. Sage: London.Google Scholar
  5. Andersen DF and Richardson GP (1997). Scripts for group model building. Syst Dynamics Rev 13: 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belton V, Ackermann F and Shepherd I (1997). Integrated support from problem structuring through to alternative evaluation using COPE and V.I.S.A. J Multi-Criteria Dec Anal 6: 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett PG, Ackermann F, Eden C and Williams TM (1997). Analysing litigation and negotiation: using a combined methodology. In: Mingers J and Gill A (eds). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 59–88.Google Scholar
  8. Bryant J and Chin CK (2000). Integrating approaches to revitalise a church's mission strategy. J Opl Res Soc 51: 689–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryson J, Ackermann F, Eden C and Finn C (2004). Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping for Practical Business Results. Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
  10. Checkland P (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
  11. Checkland P and Holwell S (1997). Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field. Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
  12. Checkland P and Holwell S (1998). Action research: its nature and validity. Syst Prac 11: 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eden C (1987). Problem solving or problem finishing? In: Jackson MC and Keys P (eds). New Directions in Management Science. Gower, Hants, pp 97–107.Google Scholar
  14. Eden C (1989). Operational research as negotiation. In: Jackson MC, Keys P and Cropper SA (eds). Operational Research and the Social Sciences. Plenum Press, NY, pp 43–50.Google Scholar
  15. Eden C (1995). On evaluating the performance of ‘wide-band’ GDSS's. Eur J Opl Res 81: 302–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eden C and Ackermann F (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage: London.Google Scholar
  17. Eden C and Ackermann F (2004). Use of ‘soft-OR’ models by clients—what do they want from them? In: Pidd M (ed). Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice. Wiley, Chichester, pp 146–163.Google Scholar
  18. Eden C and Huxham C (1996). Action research for the study of organizations. In: Clegg S, Hardy C and Nord W (eds). Handbook of Organization Studies. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 526–542.Google Scholar
  19. Eden C, Jones S and Sims D (1983). Messing About in Problems. Pergamon: Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Eden C and Sims D (1979). On the nature of problems in consulting practice. Omega 7: 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franco LA, Cushman M and Rosenhead J (2004). Project review and learning in the construction industry: embedding a problem structuring method within a partnership context. Eur J Opl Res 153: 586–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim WC and Mauborgne RA (1995). A procedural justice model of strategic decision making. Organization Sci 6: 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitroff II and Featheringham TR (1974). On systemic problem solving and the error of the third kind. Behaviour Sci 19: 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Munro I and Mingers J (2002). The use of multimethodology in practice—results of a survey of practioners. J Opl Res Soc 53: 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ormerod R (1995). Putting soft OR methods to work: information systems strategy development at Sainsbury's. J Opl Res Soc 46: 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ormerod R (1998). Putting soft OR methods to work: information systems strategy development at Palabora. Omega 26: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Phillips LD (1984). A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica 56: 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pidd M (ed) (2004). Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice. Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
  29. Richardson G and Andersen DF (1995). Teamwork in group model building. Syst Dynamics Rev 11: 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds) (2001). Rational Analysis in a Problematic World Revisited. Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
  31. Seth A and Zinkhan G (1991). Strategy and the research process: a comment. Strategic Mngt J 12: 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tranfield D and Starkey K (1998). The nature, social organisation and promotion of management research: towards policy. Br J Mngt 9: 341–353.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • C Eden
    • 1
  • F Ackermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Strathclyde Business SchoolGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations