Journal of the Operational Research Society

, Volume 56, Issue 11, pp 1250–1257

The use of simulation in the design of a road transport incident detection algorithm

Case-Oriented Paper
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Automatic incident detection is becoming one of the core tools of urban traffic management, enabling more rapid identification and response to traffic incidents and congestion. Existing traffic detection infrastructure within urban areas (often installed for traffic signal optimization) provides urban traffic control systems with a near continuous stream of data on the state of traffic within the network. The creation of a simulation to replicate such a data stream therefore provides a facility for the development of accurate congestion detection and warning algorithms. This paper describes firstly the augmentation of a commercial traffic model to provide an urban traffic control simulation platform and secondly the development of a new incident detection system (RAID—Remote Automatic Incident Detection), with the facility to use the simulation platform as an integral part of the design and calibration process. A brief description of a practical implementation of RAID is included along with summary evaluation results.

Keywords

transport traffic/accidents congestion urban traffic control 

References

  1. Department for Transport (1997). National Road Traffic Forecasts (Great Britain) 1997. TSO: London.Google Scholar
  2. Freight Transport Association (2003). Roads—Congestion is the Real Toll, Press release 29th December 2003.Google Scholar
  3. Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (2000). Road Safety Engineering Factsheet. Cost Effective Local Safety Schemes. Available at http://www.rospa.com/roadsafety/advice/highway/local_schemes.htm
  4. Traffic Advisory Unit (1999). The ‘SCOOT’ urban traffic control system. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 7/99. Department for Transport: London.Google Scholar
  5. Bretherton D, Bodger M and Baber N (2004). SCOOT—the future. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Road Transport Information and Control, IEE, UK, pp 301–306.Google Scholar
  6. Kirkham R (1997). Making the most of SCATS. Traffic Technol Int, Annual Review, 32–34.Google Scholar
  7. Abdel-Rahim A, Taylor WC and Bangia A (1998). The SCATS effect. Traffic Technol Int February/March: 57–60.Google Scholar
  8. Cherrett TJ, McLeod F, Bell H and McDonald M (2002). Journey time estimation using single inductive loop detectors on non-signalised links. J Opl Res Soc 53: 610–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Palen J (2001). A watching brief. Traffic Technol Int October/November: 43–46.Google Scholar
  10. Cherrett TJ, Bell HA and McDonald M (2000). Traffic management parameters from single inductive loop detectors. Transport Res Rec 1719: 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wren A and Jones P (1996). ROMANSE—Road management system for Europe. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Road Traffic Monitoring and Control, IEE, UK, pp 23–27.Google Scholar
  12. Cherrett T, Waterson B and McDonald M . Remote Automatic Incident Detection (RAID) using inductive loop detectors. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, forthcoming 158(2).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Transportation Research Group, University of SouthamptonHighfieldUK

Personalised recommendations