Journal of the Operational Research Society

, Volume 56, Issue 8, pp 969–980 | Cite as

A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis

Theoretical Paper

Abstract

To consider different aspects of life when measuring human development, the United Nations Development Program introduced the Human Development Index (HDI). The HDI is a composite index of socioeconomic indicators that reflect three major dimensions of human development: longevity, knowledge and standard of living. In this paper, the assessment of the HDI is reconsidered in the light of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Instead of a simple rank of the countries, human development is benchmarked on the basis of empirical observations of best practice countries. First, on the same line as HDI, we develop a DEA-like model to assess the relative performance of the countries in human development. Then we extend our calculations with a post-DEA model to derive global estimates of a new development index by using common weights for the socioeconomic indicators. Finally, we introduce the transformation paradigm in the assessment of human development. We develop a DEA model to estimate the relative efficiency of the countries in converting income to knowledge and life opportunities.

Keywords

human development index data envelopment analysis development 

References

  1. Hicks N and Streeten P (1979). Indicators of development: the search for a basic needs yardstic. World Dev 7: 567–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Streeten P et al. (1981). First Things First: Meeting Basic Needs in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  3. UNDP (2000). Human Development Report 2000. United Nations Development Program, Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  4. Noorbakhsh F (1998). A modified Human Development Index. World Dev 26: 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Sagar AD and Najam A (1998). The human development index: a critical review. Ecol Econ 25: 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Neumayer E (2001). The human development index — a constructive proposal. Ecol Econ 39: 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desai M (1991). Human development: concepts and measurement. Eur Econ Rev 35: 350–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kelly AC (1991). The human development index: ‘handle with care’. Population Dev Rev 17: 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mahlberg B and Obersteiner M (2001). Remeasuring the HDI by data envelopment analysis. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Interim Report IR-01-069, Laxemburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  10. Charnes A, Cooper WW and Rhodes E (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Opl Res 2: 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Banker RD, Charnes A and Cooper WW (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Mngt Sci 30: 1078–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper WW, Seiford LM and Tone K (1999). Data Envelopment Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston.Google Scholar
  13. Raab R, Kotamraju P and Haag S (2000). Efficient provision of child quality of life in less developed countries: conventional development indexes versus a programming approach to development indexes. Socio-Econ Plann Sci 34: 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Revilla E, Sarkis J and Modrego A (2003). Evaluating performance of public–private research collaborations: a DEA analysis. J Opl Res Soc 54: 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayston DJ (2003). Measuring and managing educational performance. J Opl Res Soc 54: 679–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mukherjee A, Nath P and Pal M (2003). Resource, service quality and performance triad: a framework for measuring efficiency of banking services. J Opl Res Soc 54: 723–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bowlin WF, Renner CJ and Rives JM (2003). A DEA study of gender equity in executive compensation. J Opl Res Soc 54: 751–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shao BBM and Shu WS (2004). Productivity breakdown of the information and computing technology industries across countries. J Opl Res Soc 55: 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Despotis DK (2004). Measuring human development via data envelopment analysis: The case of Asia and The Pacific. Omega. Int J Mngt Sci (in press).Google Scholar
  20. Despotis DK (2002). Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units. J Opl Res Soc 53: 314–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PiraeusGreece

Personalised recommendations