Skip to main content

Reply to the comments of Ormerod and Atkinson

Journal of the Operational Research Society volume 55, pages 1233–1234 (2004)Cite this article

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Georgiou I (2003). The idea of emergent property. J Opl Res Soc 54: 239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Spiegelberg H (1994). The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  3. von Bertalanffy L (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. Braziller: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Georgiou I (2000). The ontological constitution of bounding-judging in the phenomenological epistemology of von Bertalanffy's general system theory. Syst Pract Act Res 13: 391–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Georgiou I (2001). The ontological status of critique. Syst Pract Act Res 14: 407–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Georgiou I and Introna L (2000). Revisiting dogmatism and bounded rationality: the attribution of ontological status to critique. Proceedings of the 44th International Society for the Systems Sciences Conference, Toronto, Canada.

  7. Checkland P (1981). Rethinking a systems approach. J Appl Syst Anal 8: 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Easterby-Smith M and Lyles M (eds) (2003). Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, Blackwell: Oxford.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Brasil

    I Georgiou

Authors
  1. I Georgiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Georgiou, I. Reply to the comments of Ormerod and Atkinson. J Oper Res Soc 55, 1233–1234 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601781

Download citation