Content analysis of data envelopment analysis literature and its comparison with that of other OR/MS fields
Content analysis was performed on the data envelopment analysis (DEA) literature appearing in refereed journals. The extant DEA literature, reported in Gattoufi et al was subdivided into two ways. The first considers all articles appearing during the life cycle of 22 selected major DEA publishing journals. The second considers all post-1995 DEA articles. Content was judged on the basis of a two-point scale representing advancements in theory; a five-point scale indicating contributions to practice; and on seven distinguishable strategies applied by the authors in pursuing their research. Lastly, DEA was compared with similarly obtained results describing the life cycle literatures of flow shop scheduling and of cell manufacturing. This analysis has proven the vitality, robustness, and real-world grounding of DEA on its own and vis-à-vis other OR/MS sub-disciplines. Moreover, the breadth of its diffusion into other disciplines and professions has been shown to be extraordinary.
KeywordsData envelopment analysis DEA efficiency analysis content analysis classification philosophy of OR practice of OR meta-review research on research
- Gattoufi S, Oral M and Reisman A (2003). Data envelopment analysis literature: a bibliography update (1996–2001). Socio Econ Plan Sci, forthcoming. Corrected proof available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science.
- Avkiran NK (2002). Productivity Analysis in the Service Sector with Data Envelopment Analysis, 2nd edn. Queensland (http://www.uq.edu.au/financesite/aboutbook.htm).
- Gattoufi S, Oral M, Kumar A and Reisman A (2003). Epistemology of data envelopment analysis and comparison with other fields of OR/MS for relevance to applications. Socio Econ Plan Sci, forthcoming. Corrected proof available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science.
- Reisman A (2003). Data envelopment analysis: preface to a special issue of socio-economic planning sciences. Socio Econ Plan Sci, forthcoming. Corrected proof available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science.
- Førsund FR and Sarafoglou N (2003). The tale of two research communities: the diffusion of research on productivity efficiency. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
- Koopmans TC (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC (Ed). Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph 13. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- Gattoufi S, Oral M and Reisman A (2003). A taxonomy for data envelopment analysis. Socio Econ Plan Sci, in press. Corrected proof available online at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science.
- Reisman A (1992). Management Science Knowledge: It's Creation, Generalization and Consolidation. Quorum Books Publishing Company: Westport, CT.Google Scholar
- Reisman A, Kumar A and Motwani J (2001). A meta review of game theory publications in the flagship US-based OR/MS journals. Mngt Decis 39: 147–155.Google Scholar
- Reisman A, Oral M and Gattoufi S (2003). Absolutely positively operations research: 50 years of contributions by William Wager Cooper. Working Paper SUGSM—02-10, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey 2001. Socio Econ Plan Sci, in press.Google Scholar
- Abbott A (1988). The Systems of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labour. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
- Reisman A (1979). Systems Analysis in Health-Care Delivery. Lexington Books: Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
- Banker RD (1990). A game theoretic approach to measuring efficiency. Eur J Opl Res 52: 62–66.Google Scholar
- Charnes A, Clarke RL and Cooper WW (1989). An approach to testing for organisational slack with Banker's game theoretic formulation of DEA. Res Govern Non-Profit Account 5: 211–230.Google Scholar
- Chobot M and Institoris J (1998). Comparison of data envelopment analysis and game theory approaches to efficiency evaluation. Cent Eur J Opns Res Econ 6: 275–278.Google Scholar
- Horner P (2003). The science of better. OR/MS Today, December: 20–23.Google Scholar