Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 40–51 | Cite as

IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis

  • Marleen Huysman
  • Volker Wulf
Research Article


Ignoring the informal, non-canonical nature of knowledge sharing, including people's motivation, ability and opportunity to share knowledge, is one of the key causes of resistance to use knowledge-sharing tools. In order to improve knowledge sharing supported by information technology (IT), tools need to be embedded in the social networks of which it is part. This has implications for our knowledge on the design requirements of such socially embedded IT. The paper reviews tools that are designed for the purpose to foster social capital. We will then discuss what is needed for an IS design theory related to knowledge communities and how such a theory could incorporate social capital theory.


knowledge management communities requirement analysis social capital socio-technical design 


  1. Ackerman, M.S. (1998). Augmenting Organizational Memory: A field study of answer garden, ACM Transactions on Information Systems 16 (3): 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, M.S. and Halverson, C.H. (2004). Sharing Expertise: The next step for knowledge management, in M.H. Huysman and V. Wulf (eds.) Social Capital and Information Technology, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 273–299.Google Scholar
  3. Ackerman, M.S. and Malone, T.W. (1990). Answer Garden: A tool for growing organizational memory, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Office Information Systems (Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990); New York: ACM Press. 31–39.Google Scholar
  4. Ackerman, M., Pipek, V. and Wulf, V. (2003). Beyond Knowledge Management: Sharing expertise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Adler, P. and Kwon, S-W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review 27 (1): 17–40.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, G. (1964). Human Capital, a Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  7. Becks, A., Reichling, T. and Wulf, V. (2004). Expert Finding: Approaches to foster social capital, in M. Huysman and V. Wulf (eds.) Social Capital and Information Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 333–354.Google Scholar
  8. Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. and Pinch, T.J. (1987). The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blanchard, A. and Horan, T. (1998). Virtual communities and social capital, Social Science Review 16 (3): 293–307.Google Scholar
  10. Boland, R. (1991). Information System Use as a Hermeneutic Process, in H.E. Nissen, H.K. Klein and R. Hirschheim (eds.) Information Systems Research: Contemporary approaches & emergent traditions, New York: North-Holland, pp. 439–458.Google Scholar
  11. Boland, R.J. and Tenkasi, R.V. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing, Organization Science 6 (4): 350–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bontis, N. (1999). Managing Organizational Knowledge by Diagnosing Intellectual Capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field, International Journal of Technology Management 18 (5/6/7/8): 433–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The form of capital, in J.G. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–258.Google Scholar
  14. Bressand, A. and Distler, C. (1995). La Planete Relationelle, Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (2000). The Social Life of Information, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and Organization: A social-practice perspective, Organization Science 12 (2): 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buckingham, S. (1997). Negotiating the Construction and Reconstruction of Organisational Memories, Journal of Universal Computer Science (Special Issue on IT for Knowledge Management), 3 (8): 899–928.Google Scholar
  18. Burt, R.S (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Chapman, R. (2004). Pearls of Wisdom: Social capital building in informal learning environments, in M.H. Huysman and V. Wulf (eds.) Social Capital and Information Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 310–333.Google Scholar
  20. Checkland, P.B. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Choo, C.W., Detlor, B. and Turnbull, D. (2000). WebWork, Information Seeking and Knowledge Work on the World Wide Web, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Churchill, E., Nelson, L. and Denoue, L. (2003). Multimedia Fliers: Information sharing with digital community bulletin boards, in M. Huysman, E.Wenger, V. Wulf (eds.) Proceedings of the Communities & Technologies (Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2003); Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  23. Ciborra, C.U (1996). Groupware and Teamwork, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  24. Clegg, C.W. (2000). Sociotechnical Principles for System Design, Applied Ergonomics 31: 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen, D. and Prusak, L. (2001). In Good Company: How social capital makes organizations work, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cross, R. and Borgatti, S.P. (2004). The Ties that Share: Relational characteristics that facilitate information seeking, in M. Huysman and V. Wulf (eds.) Social Capital and Information Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 137–162.Google Scholar
  27. Davenport, T.H. (1997). Information Ecology, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How organizations manage what they know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  29. De Sanctis, G. and Poole, M.S. (1994). Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive structuration theory, Organization Science 5 (2): 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Divitini, M. and Farshchian, B. (2004). Shared Displays for Promoting Informal Cooperation: An exploratory study, in F. Darses, R. Dieng, C Simone and M. Zacklad (eds.) Cooperative Systems Design – Scenario-based Design of Collaborative Systems, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 211–226.Google Scholar
  31. Dodgson, M. (1993). Learning, Trust and Technological Collaboration, Human Relations 46: 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Edvinsson, L. and Malone, M.S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden roots, New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  33. Ehrlich, K (2000). Designing Groupware Applications, in D.E. Smit (ed.) Knowledge, Groupware and the Internet, Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  34. Ehrlich, K. and Cash (1994). Turning Information into Knowledge: Information finding as a collaborative activity, in Proceedings of Digital Libraries (College Station, USA, 1994).Google Scholar
  35. Etzioni, A. (1995). New Communitarian Thinking: persons, virtues, institutions, and communities,, Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  36. Fesenmaier, J. and Contractor, N. (2001). Inquiring Knowledge Networks on the Web (IKNOW): The evolution of knowledge networks for rural development, The Journal of the Community Development Society 32: 160–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fischer, G., Scharff, E. and Ye, Y. (2004). Fostering Social Creativity by Increasing Social Capital, in M. Huysman and V. Wulf (eds.) Social Capital and Information Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press, pp. 355–399.Google Scholar
  38. Foner, L.N. (1997). Yenta: A multi-agent, referral-based matchmaking system, in First International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agent'97); New York: ACM-Press. 301–307.Google Scholar
  39. Granovetter, M (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gräther, W. and Prinz, W. (2001). The Social Web Cockpit: Support for virtual communities, in Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (Boulder, USA, 2001) New York: ACM Press. 252–259.Google Scholar
  41. Hansen, M.T. (1999). The Search-Transfer Problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization sub-units, Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1): 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hargadon, A.B. (1998). Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation, California Management Review 40 (3): 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hinds, P.J. and Pfeffer, J. (2003). Why Organizations Don't ‘Know What They Know’: Cognitive and motivational factors affecting the transfer of expertise, in M. Ackerman, V. Pipek and V. Wulf (eds.) Beyond Knowledge Management: Sharing expertise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
  44. Holsapple, C.W. (2003). Handbook on Knowledge Management, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T. and Andersen, H. (1994). Moving Out from the Control Room: Ethnography in system design, in Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chapel Hill, USA, 1994); New York: ACM Press. 429–439.Google Scholar
  46. Huysman, M.H. (2000). Rethinking Organizational Learning, Accountancy Management and Information Technology 10: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Huysman, M.H. (2004). Traps and Challenges for Knowledge Sharing in Practice, Journal of Knowledge and Process Management 11: 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Huysman, M.H. and de Wit, D. (2002). Knowledge Sharing in Practice, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Huysman, M. and Wulf, V. (2004a). Social Capital and Information Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Huysman, M.H. and Wulf, V. (2004b). Social Capital and IT – Current debates and research, in M. Huysman and V. Wulf (eds.) Social Capital and Information Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  51. Jordan, B. (1996). Ethnographic Workplace Studies and CSCW, in D. Shapiro, M. Tauber and R. Traunmuller (eds.) The Design of Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware Systems. Human Factors in Information Technology, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kautz, H.A., Selman, B. and Shah, M. (1997a). Referral Web: Combining social networks and collaborative filtering, Communication of the ACM 40 (3): 63–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kautz, H.A., Selman, B. and Shah, M. (1997b). The Hidden Web, AI Magazine 18 (2): 27–36.Google Scholar
  54. Kumar, K., van Dissel, H.G. and Bielli, P. (1998). The Merchant of Prato – Revisited: Toward a third rationality of information systems, Management Information Systems Quarterly 22 (2): 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kuutti, K. (1991). Activity Theory and its Applications to Information Systems Research and development, in H.-E. Nissen (ed.) The Information Systems Research Arena of the 90s, Challenges, Perceptions and Alternative Approaches, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 529–549.Google Scholar
  56. Lanzara, G.F. (1983). The Design Process. Frames, Metaphors and Games, in U. Briefs, C. Ciborra and L. Schneider (eds.) Systems Design For, With, and By the Users: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 9.1 Working Conference on Systems Design For, With, and By the Users (Riva De Sole, Italy, 20–24 September, 1982); Amsterdam: North-Holland. 29–40.Google Scholar
  57. Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S. (1998). The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation, California Management Review 40 (3): 112–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lesser, E. and Cothrel, J. (2001). Fast Friends: Virtuality and social capital, Knowledge Directions 2 (1): 66–79.Google Scholar
  59. Lesser, E.L. (2000). Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and applications, Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  60. MacKenzie, D.A. and Wajcman, J. (1999). The Social Shaping of Technology 2nd ed., Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A. and Gasser, L. (2002). A Design Theory for Systems that Support Emergent Knowledge Processes, MIS Quarterly 26 (3): 179–213.Google Scholar
  62. Maybury, M., D'Amore, R. and House, D. (2003). Automated Discovery and Mapping of Expertise, in M. Ackerman, V. Pipek and V. Wulf (eds.) Expertise Sharing: Beyond Knowledge Management, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 359–382.Google Scholar
  63. McDonald, D.W. (2000). Supporting Nuance in Groupware Design: Moving from naturalistic expertise location to expertise recommendation, PhD Thesis, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
  64. McDonald, D.W. (2003). Recommending Collaboration with Social Networks: A comparative evaluation, in Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'03) (Ft. Lauderdale, USA, 2003); New York: ACM Press. 593–600.Google Scholar
  65. Mumford, E. (2003). Redesigning Human Systems, Hershey, PA: IRM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage, Academy of Management Review 23 (2): 242–266.Google Scholar
  67. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., Isaacs, E., Creech, M., Johnson, J. and Hainsworth, J. (2002). Integrating Communication and Information through ContactMap, Communications of the ACM 45 (4): 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Newell, S., Scarbrough, H. and Swan, J. (2001). From Global Knowledge Management to Internal Electronic Fences: Contradictory outcomes of intranet development, British Journal of Management 12 (2): 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ogata, H., Yano, Y., Furugori, N. and Jin, Q. (2001). Computer Supported Social Networking for Augmenting Cooperation, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, The Journal of Collaborative Computing 10: 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Orlikowski, W. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures, a Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations, Organization Science 4 (11): 404–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Orlikowski, W.J. and Robey, D. (1991). Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations, Information Systems Research (2): 143–169.Google Scholar
  72. Orlikowski, W.J. and Yates, J. (1994). Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 541–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pipek, V. and Won, M. (2002). Communication-oriented Computer Support for Knowledge Management, Informatik/Informatique – Magazine of the Swiss Informatics Societies (1): 39–43.Google Scholar
  74. Pipek, V. and Wulf, V. (1999). A Groupware's Life, in Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1999); Dordrecht: Kluwer. 199–219.Google Scholar
  75. Pipek, V. and Wulf, V. (2003). Pruning the Answer Garden: Knowledge sharing in maintenance engineering, in Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW, Helsinki, Finland 2003); Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1–20.Google Scholar
  76. Preece, J. (2002). Supporting Community and Building Social Capital, Special Issue of Communications of the ACM 45 (4): 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  78. Resnick, P. (2001). Beyond Bowling Together: Sociotechnical capital, in J.M. Carroll (ed.) Human Computer Interaction in the New Millennium, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 647–672.Google Scholar
  79. Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N. and Edvinsson, L. (1998). Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Shapiro, D. (1994). The Limits of Ethnography: combining social sciences for CSCW, in Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chapel Hill, USA, 1994); New York: ACM Press. 417–428.Google Scholar
  81. Snyder, W. and Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice, the Organizational Frontier, Harvard Business Review 78 (January/February): 139–145.Google Scholar
  82. Stahl, G. (2004). Building Collaborative Knowing – Elements of a social theory of learning, in J.W. Strijbos, P. Kirschner and R. Martens (eds.) What We Know About CSCL in Higher Education, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 53–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stewart, T.A. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organizations, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  84. Streeter, L.A. and Lochman, K.A. (1988). An Expert/Expert Location System Based on an Automatic Representation of Semantic Structure, in Proceedings of the Forth Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications (San Diego, USA, 1988); New York: ACM Press. 345–350.Google Scholar
  85. Sveiby, K.E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge based assets, London: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  86. Syrjänen, L. and Kuutti, K. (2004). Trust, Acceptance and Alignment: The role of IT in redirecting a community, in M. Huysman and V. Wulf (eds.) Social Capital and Information Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 21–52.Google Scholar
  87. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal 17: 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The paradox of embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vivacqua, A. and Lieberman, H. (2000). Agents to Assist in Finding Help, Proceedings in the Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2000); New York: ACM Press. 65–72.Google Scholar
  90. Walls, J., Widmeyer, G. and El Sawy, O. (1992). Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS, Information Systems Research 3 (1): 36–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Walsham, G. (1997). Actor Network Theory and IS Research: Current status and future prospects, in A.S. Lee, J. Liebenau and J.I. DeGross (eds.) Information Systems and Qualitative Research, London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 466–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wasko, M. and Faraj, S. (2005). Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice, MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 35–58.Google Scholar
  93. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wellman, B. (2000). Computer Networks as Social Networks, Science 293 (14): 2031–2034.Google Scholar
  95. Wellman, B, Haase, A.Q, Witte, J. and Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? American Behavioral Scientist 45: 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Won, M. and Pipek, V (2003). Sharing Knowledge on Knowledge – The eXact peripheral expertise awareness system, Journal of Universal Computer Science 9 (12): 1388–1397.Google Scholar
  98. Wulf, V. and Rohde, M. (1995). Towards an Integrated Organization and Technology Development, in Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems (Ann Arbor, USA, 1995); New York: ACM Press. 55–64.Google Scholar
  99. Yiman-Seid, D. and Kobsa, A. (2003). Expert Finding Systems for Organizations: Problem and domain analysis and the DEMOIR approach, in M. Ackerman, V. Pipek and V. Wulf (eds.) Expertise Sharing: Beyond Knowledge Management, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 327–358.Google Scholar
  100. Zack, M.H (1999). Managing codified knowledge, Sloan Management Review 40 (4): 45–58.Google Scholar
  101. Zack, M.H. and McKenny, J.L. (2000). Social Context and Interaction in Ongoing Computer-supported Management Groups, in D.E. Smith (ed.) Knowledge, Groupware and the Internet, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of SiegenSiegenGermany
  3. 3.Fraunhofer FITSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations