Journal of Information Technology

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 20–31 | Cite as

Knowing why and how to innovate with packaged business software

Research Review

Abstract

When firms move to adopt and implement a popular IT innovation, what knowledge must they have or gain, in order to be successful? Here we offer a model that explains a firm's success in terms of its adoption know-why and know-when and its implementation know-how. We examine this model in an exploratory survey of some 118 firms' adoption and implementation of packaged business software in the 1990s. Using multivariate methods, we identify business coordination as know-why and management understanding and vendor support as know-how factors important to success, explaining nearly 60% of the variance. There is limited evidence that the right adoption know-why may help in acquiring or fostering the right implementation know-how. The findings serve to remind practitioners that they should attend carefully to adoption rationales, grounded in business benefits, when they innovate with new IT.

Keywords

know-why know-how innovation information technology packaged business software enterprise resource planning (ERP) 

References

  1. Abrahamson, E. and Fairchild, G. (1999). Management Fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes, Administrative Science Quarterly 44(4): 708–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackoff, R.L. and Emery, F.E. (1972). On Purposeful Systems, Seaside, CA: Intersystems.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1984). The Effect of Sampling Error on Convergence, Improper Solutions, and Goodness-of-fit Indices for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Psychometrika 49(2): 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Attewell, P. (1992). Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The case of business computing, Organization Science 3(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bancroft, N.H., Seip, H and Sprengel, A (1998). Implementing SAP R/3, Greenwich: Manning.Google Scholar
  6. Bentler, P.M. and Weeks, D.G. (1980). Linear structural equations with latent variables, Psychometrika 45(3): 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bentler, P.M. and Wu, E.J.C. (2000). EQS Structural Equations Program Manual, Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R.A. (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit, in K.A. Bollen and J.S. Long (eds.) Testing Structural Equation Models, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 136–162.Google Scholar
  9. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young (1999). Enterprise resource planning: survey 1999 [WWW document], http://www.capgemini.de/news/erp.html(accessed August 28, 2000).
  10. Carroll, J.B. (2003). The Higher-stratum Structure of Cognitive Abilities: Current evidence supports g and about ten broad factors, in H. Nyborg (ed.) The Scientific Study of General Intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen, Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chin, W.W. (1998). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling, MIS Quarterly 22(1): vii–xvi.Google Scholar
  12. Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I. and Dexter, A.S. (2001). Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model, Information Systems Research 12(3): 304–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Consistency of Tests, Psychometrika 16: 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, Academy of Management Journal 34(3): 555–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davenport, T.H. (1998). Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System, Harvard Business Review 76(4): 121–131.Google Scholar
  16. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dos Santos, B.L. and Peffers, K. (1995). Rewards to Investors in Innovative Information Technology Applications: First movers and early followers in ATMs, Organization Science 6(3): 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eschinger, C. (2002). ERP Market in Turmoil: Market Statistics, 2002, Gartner, Inc., August 12.Google Scholar
  19. Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C. and Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research, Psychological Methods 4(3): 272–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fichman, R.G. and Kemerer, C.F. (1997). The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An organizational learning perspective, Management Science 43(10): 1345–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fichman, R.G. and Kemerer, C.F. (1999). The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps, Information Systems Research 10(3): 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuller, M.K. and Swanson, E.B. (1992). Information Centers as Organizational Innovation: Exploring the correlates of implementation success, Journal of Management Information Systems 9(1): 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gallivan, M.J. (2001). Organizational Adoption and Assimilation of Complex Technological Innovations: Development and application of a new framework, Database for Advances in Information Systems 32(3): 51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garud, R. (1997). On the Distinction between Know-how, Know-what, and Know-why, in J.P. Walsh and A.S. Huff (eds.) Organizational Learning and Strategic Management: Advances in Strategic Management, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 81–101.Google Scholar
  25. Hirt, S.G. and Swanson, E.B. (2001). Emergent Maintenance of ERP: New roles and relationships, Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution 13(6): 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu, L.-t. and Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling 6(1): 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Janson, M.A. and Subramanian, A. (1996). Packaged Software: Selection and implementation policies, INFOR 34(2): 133–151.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, R.A. and Wichern, D.W. (2002). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Keller, E.L. (1999). Lessons Learned, Manufacturing Systems 17(11): 44–50.Google Scholar
  30. Klaus, H., Roseman, M. and Gable, G.G. (2000). What is Enterprise Resource Planning? Information Systems Frontiers 2(2): 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R.C., Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1995). On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities, Research Policy 24(2): 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology, Organization Science 3(3): 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumar, K. and Van Hillegersberg, J. (2000). ERP – Experiences and Evolution, Communications of the ACM 43(4): 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leonard-Barton, D. and Deschamps, I. (1988). Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology, Management Science 34(10): 1252–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lieber, R.B. (1995). Here Comes SAP, Fortune 132(7), October 2, 122 ff.Google Scholar
  36. Lucas, H.C., Ginzberg, M.J. and Schultz, R.L. (1990). Information Systems Implementation: Testing a structural model, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  37. Markus, M.L., Axline, S., Petrie, D. and Tanis, C. (2003). Learning from Adopters' Experiences with ERP, in G. Shanks, P. Seddon and L.P. Willcocks (eds.) Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mata, F.J., Fuerst, W.L. and Barney, J.B. (1995). Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A resource-based analysis, MIS Quarterly 19(4): 487–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meyer, A.D. and Goes, J.B. (1988). Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A multilevel contextual analysis, Academy of Management Journal 31(4): 897–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mulaik, S.A. and Millsap, R.E. (2000). Doing the Four-step Right, Structural Equation Modeling 7(1): 36–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, (2nd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  43. Oliver, D. and Romm, C. (2002). Justifying Enterprise Resource Planning Adoption, Journal of Information Technology 17(4): 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Orlikowski, W.J. (1993). CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development, MIS Quarterly 17(3): 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy 13(6): 343–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pennings, J.M. and Harianto, F. (1992). Technological Networking and Innovation Implementation, Organization Science 3(3): 356–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robey, D., Ross, J.W. and Boudreau, M.-C. (2002). Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change, Journal of Management Information Systems 19(1): 17–46.Google Scholar
  48. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ross, J.W., Vitale, M.R. and Willcocks, L.P. (2003). The Continuing ERP Revolution: Sustainable lessons, new modes of delivery, in G. Shanks, P. Seddon and L.P. Willcocks (eds.) Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scott, J.E. and Vessey, I. (2002). Managing Risks in Enterprise Systems Implementations, Communications of the ACM 45(4): 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Swanson, E.B. (1988). Information System Implementation: Bridging the gap between design and utilization, Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  52. Swanson, E.B. (2003). Innovating with Packaged Business Software: Towards an assessment, in G. Shanks, P. Seddon and L.P. Willcocks (eds.) Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swanson, E.B. and Ramiller, N.C. (1997). The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation, Organization Science 8(5): 458–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tolbert, P.S. and Zucker, L.G. (1983). Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935, Administrative Science Quarterly 28(1): 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Willcocks, L. and Sykes, R. (2000). The Role of the CIO and IT Function in ERP, Communications of the ACM 43(4): 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Winter, S.G. (1987). Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets, in D.J. Teece (eds.) The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 159–184.Google Scholar
  57. Wylie, L. (1990). ERP: A vision of the next-generation MRP II, Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Gartner Group S-300(339.2): 1–2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Information Technology Trust 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCLA Anderson School of ManagementLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations