George Liska and political realism: on the tension between history and structure, and between norms and power

  • Petr Kratochvíl
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This article suggests that it is by exploring the work of George Liska, the once influential yet today almost forgotten realist scholar, that we can find answers to the question of the compatibility between classical realism and its purported neoclassical offspring. Firstly, although Liska is not widely read today and his recent books are only rarely cited, the evolution of his work reveals that the tension between normativity and politics is an inseparable part of classical realist thinking. Secondly, even though he started from a purely historicist version of realism, as demonstrated in his treatment of empire and international order, Liska came to be one of the first realist scholars to try to develop a theory combining historicism and a structural approach to international relations. To those general reasons one may add a particular third one, specifically interesting for Journal of International Relations and Development. Even though Liska spent most of his scholarly career in the United States, he belonged to the group of émigrés from Central Europe (in his case from Czechoslovakia); and this heritage leaves a special mark on all his works dedicated to the Soviet Union, and Eastern and Central Europe. His work is thus an interesting testimony to the rise and fall of realist hegemony over the field of international relations; hence, ironically reinforcing Liska's own notion of the historical contingency of all human cognition.

Keywords

Central and Eastern Europe George Liska international relations realism theory of international relations 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Vít Beneš, Petr Drulák, Stefano Guzzini, Jan Karlas, and the three anonymous referees for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article.

References

  1. Ashley, Richard K. (1981) ‘Political Realism and Human Interests’, International Studies Quarterly 25 (2): 204–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashley, Richard K. (1998) ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17 (2): 227–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backhaus, Jürgen G. (1995) ‘Introduction: Wilhelm Roscher (1817–1894): A Centenary Reappraisal’, Journal of Economic Studies 22 (3–5): 4–15.Google Scholar
  4. Barkai, Haim (1996) ‘The Methodenstreit and the Emergence of Mathematical Economics’, Eastern Economic Journal 22 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
  5. Berdyaev, Nikolai (1962) The Russian Idea, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blaug, Mark (1986) Great Economists Before Keynes: An Introduction to the Lives and Works of One Hundred Great Economists of the Past, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar
  7. Bull, Hedley (1972/1995) ‘The Theory of International Politics, 1919–1969’, in James Der Derian, ed., International Theory: Critical Investigations, 181–211, Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, Edward H. (2001) The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939, Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  9. Christensen, Thomas J. (1996) Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Claude, Inis (1962) Power and International Relations, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  11. Fukuyama, Francis (1989) ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest 16 (Summer): 3–18.Google Scholar
  12. Guzzini, Stefano (1998) Realism in International Relations and the International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Haas, Ernst (1953) ‘The Balance of Power: Prescription, Concept or Propaganda?’, World Politics 5 (4): 442–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haas, Ernst (1965) ‘The Role of Theory in International Relations; Systems of Integrating the International Community; Europe Ascendant: The International Politics of Unification — Review’, Political Science Quarterly 80 (4): 680–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herz, John (1962) International Politics in the Atomic Age, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hoffmann, Stanley (1961) ‘International Systems and International Law’, World Politics 14: 662–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoffmann, Stanley (1987) ‘Hans Morgenthau: The Limits and Influence of Realism’, in Stanley Hoffmann, ed., Janus and Minerva, 70–81, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  18. Katzenstein, Peter, ed. (1996) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye (1977) Power and Interdependence, Boston, MA: Little and Brown.Google Scholar
  21. Liska, George (1957) International Equilibrium: A Theoretical Essay on the Politics and Organization of Security, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liska, George (1960) The New Statecraft: Foreign Aid in American Foreign Policy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Liska, George (1962) Nations in Alliance: The Limits of Interdependence, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Liska, George (1963) ‘Continuity and Change in International Systems’, World Politics 16 (1): 118–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liska, George (1964) Europe Ascendant: The International Politics of Unification, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Liska, George (1967) Imperial America: The International Politics of Primacy, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Liska, George (1968a) Alliances and the Third World, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Liska, George (1968b) War and Order: Reflections on Vietnam and History, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Liska, George (1977/1984) ‘Morgenthau vs. Machiavelli: Political Realism and Power Politics’, in Kenneth Thompson and Robert J. Myers, eds, Truth and Tragedy: A Tribute to Hans J. Morgenthau, 104–111, New Brunswick, NJ: Council of Religion and International Affairs.Google Scholar
  30. Liska, George (1978) Career of Empire: America & Imperial Expansion over Land & Sea, Baltimore, MA and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Liska, George (1980) Russia and World Order: Strategic Choices and the Laws of Power in History, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Liska, George (1982) Russia and the Road to Appeasement: Cycles of East–West Conflict in War & Peace, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Liska, George (1987) Rethinking US–Soviet Relations, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Liska, George (1990a) Fallen Dominions, Reviving Powers: Germany, the Slavs and Europe's Unfinished Agenda, Washington, DC and Praha: Johns Hopkins Foreign Policy Institute and Ústav mezinárodních vztahù.Google Scholar
  35. Liska, George (1990b) The Ways of Power: Pattern and Meaning in World Politics, Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Liska, George (1994) Return to the Heartland & Rebirth of the Old Order: Reconceptualizing the Environment of Strategies for East-Central Europe & Beyond, Washington, DC and Prague: The Johns Hopkins Foreign Policy Institute and Ústav mezinárodní politiky.Google Scholar
  37. Liska, George (1998a) In Search of Poetry in the Politics of Power: Perspectives on Expanding Realism, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  38. Liska, George (1998b) Expanding Realism: The Historical Dimension of World Politics, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  39. Liska, George (1999) Resurrecting a Discipline: Enduring Scholarship for Evolving World Politics, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  40. Liska, George (2003) Twilight of a Hegemony: The Late Career of Imperial America, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  41. Machiavelli, Niccolò (1531/2004) Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius, Project Gutenberg, available at http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=46063 (10 February, 2007).
  42. Mackinder, Halford John (1904) ‘The Geographic Pivot of History’, The Geographical Journal 23 (4): 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mahan, Alfred Thayer (1890/2004) The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660–178, Project Gutenberg, available at http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/13529 (2 February, 2007).
  44. McDonald, Terrrence, ed. (1999) The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mercer, Jonathan (1995) ‘Anarchy and Identity’, International Organization 49 (2): 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mercer, Jonathan (2006) ‘Human Nature and the First Image: Emotion and International Politics’, Journal of International Relations and Development 9 (3): 288–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morgenthau, Hans J. (1946/1965) Scientific Man Versus Power Politics, 5th edition, Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Morgenthau, Hans J. (1948) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: Alfred a. Knopf.Google Scholar
  49. Morgenthau, Hans J. (2005) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  50. Murray, Alastair J.H. (1996) ‘The Moral Politics of Hans Morgenthau’, Review of Politics 58 (1): 81–107.Google Scholar
  51. Neumann, Iver B. and Ole Wæver, eds. (1997) The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Niebuhr, Reinhold (1953) Christian Realism and Political Problems, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
  53. Ó Tuathail, Gearóid (1999) ‘Understanding Critical Geopolitics: Geopolitics and Risk Security’, in Colin S. Gray and Geoffrey Sloan, eds, Geopolitics, Geography and Strategy, 107–124, Portland, OR and London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  54. Onuf, Nicholas G. (1989) The World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  55. Osgood, Robert E. (1967) Alliances and American Foreign Policy, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Osgood, Robert E. and Robert W. Tucker (1967) Force, Order and Justice, Baltimore, MA: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Raskin, Marcus (1977/1984) ‘Morgenthau: The Idealism of a Realist’, in Kenneth Thompson and Robert J. Myers, eds, Truth and Tragedy: A Tribute to Hans J. Morgenthau, 85–94, New Brunswick, NJ: Council of Religion and International Affairs.Google Scholar
  58. Roscher, Wilhelm (1854) System der Volkswirtschaft; Band 1: Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie, Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
  59. Rose, Gideon (1998) ‘Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy’, World Politics 51 (1): 144–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosecrance, Richard N. (1963) Action and Reaction in World Politics: International Systems in Perspective, Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  61. Schweller, Randall L. (1998) Deadly Imbalance: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Schweller, Randall L. (2003) ‘The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism’, in Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman, eds, Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, 311–347, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  63. Schweller, Randall L. and David Priess (1997) ‘A Tale of Two Realisms: Expanding the Institutions Debate’, Mershon International Studies Review 41 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Senn, Peter N. (2005) ‘The German Historical Schools in the History of Economic Thought’, Journal of Economic Studies 32 (3): 185–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sullivan, Michael P. (2005) ‘“That Dog Won't Hunt”: The Cottage Industry of Realist Criticism, or Must You Play that Waltz Again?’, Journal of International Relations and Development 8 (4): 381–408.Google Scholar
  66. Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. (2000/2001) ‘Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited’, International Security 25 (3): 128–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walker, Rob J. (1993) Inside/outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Walt, Stephen M. (2002) ‘The Enduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition’, in Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, eds, Political Science: The State of the Discipline, 197–234, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  69. Waltz, Kenneth (1979) Theory of International Politics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  70. Wendt, Alexander (1992) ‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization 46 (2): 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wohlforth, William C. (1993) The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions during the Cold War, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wohlforth, William C. (1994/1995) ‘Realism and the End of the Cold War’, International Security 19 (3): 91–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wolfers, Arnold (1962) Discord and Collaboration, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Zakaria, Fareed (1992) ‘Realism and Domestic Politics: A Review Essay’, International Security 17 (1): 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zakaria, Fareed (1998) From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America's World Role, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petr Kratochvíl
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of International RelationsCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations