Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 490–508 | Cite as

Guanxi vs networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American managers

  • Roy Y J Chua
  • Michael W Morris
  • Paul Ingram
Article

Abstract

This research investigates hypotheses about differences between Chinese and American managers in the configuration of trusting relationships within their professional networks. Consistent with hypotheses about Chinese familial collectivism, an egocentric network survey found that affect- and cognition-based trust were more intertwined for Chinese than for American managers. In addition, the effect of economic exchange on affect-based trust was more positive for Chinese than for Americans, whereas the effect of friendship was more positive for Americans than for Chinese. Finally, the extent to which a given relationship was highly embedded in ties to third parties increased cognition-based trust for Chinese but not for Americans. Implications for cultural research and international business practices are discussed.

Keywords

guanxi trust culture social network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Departmental Editor, Professor Kwok Leung, and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and editorial advice throughout the review process. We also thank members of the Morris Lab for comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper.

References

  1. Bearman, P. 1997. Generalized exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 102 (5): 1383–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. 1986. The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Eds), The psychology of the Chinese people: 213–266. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brewer, M., & Chen, Y. 2007. Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114 (1): 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burt, R. S. 2005. Brokerage and closure. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. K. 1991. Toward understanding and measuring condition of trust: Evolution of a condition of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17 (3): 643–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, C., Chen, Y., & Xin, 2004. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15 (2): 200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, X. P., & Chen, C. C. 2004. On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21 (3): 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chow, I. H., & Ng, I. 2004. The characteristics of Chinese personal ties (guanxi): Evidence from Hong Kong. Organization Studies, 25 (7): 1075–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chua, R. Y. J., Ingram, P., & Morris, M. 2008. From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers' professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (3): 436–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coleman, J. 1990. Foundation of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, J., & Wall, T. 1980. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need nonfulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53 (1): 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cross, R., & Sproull, L. 2004. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15 (4): 446–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drolet, A. L., & Morris, M. W. 2000. Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36 (1): 26–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farh, J., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9 (4): 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flynn, F. J. 2005. Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30 (4): 737–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6): 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guthrie, D. 1998. The declining significance of guanxi in China's economic transition. China Quarterly, 154 (3): 254–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hausman, J. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46 (6): 1251–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. 1984. Econometric-models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52 (4): 909–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho, D. Y. F. 1976. On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81 (4): 867–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ho, D. Y. F. 1998. Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffman, D., Griffin, M., & Gavin, M. 2000. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds), Multlilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: 467–511. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Hsu, F. L. K. 1953. Americans and Chinese: Two ways of life. New York: Abelard-Schuman.Google Scholar
  25. Hsu, F. L. K. 1971. A hypothesis on kinship and culture. In F. L. K. Hsu (Ed.), Kinship and culture: 3–30. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  26. Hung, C. F. 2004. Cultural influence on relationship cultivation strategies: Multinational companies in China. Journal of Communication Management, 8 (3): 264–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ingram, P., & Roberts, P. W. 2000. Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. The American Journal of Sociology, 106 (2): 387–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Janicik, G. A., & Larrick, R. P. 2005. Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88 (2): 348–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kao, J. 1993. The worldwide web of Chinese business. Harvard Business Review, 71 (2): 24–36.Google Scholar
  30. King, A. Y. 1991. Kuan-hsi and network building: A sociological interpretation. Daedalus, 120 (2): 63–84.Google Scholar
  31. Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. 1994. Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19 (2): 195–229.Google Scholar
  32. Kramer, R. M. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 569–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lai, G. 1995. Work and family roles and psychological well-being in urban China. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36 (1): 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lang, O. 1946. Chinese family and society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50 (11): 1477–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. 1996. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research: 114–139. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. 1985. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63 (4): 967–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lin, N. 2001. Guanxi: A conceptual analysis. In A. So, N. Lin & D. Poston (Eds), The Chinese triangle of mainland, Taiwan, and Hong Kong: Comparative institutional analysis: 153–166. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  39. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98 (2): 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3): 709–734.Google Scholar
  41. McAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1): 24–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morris, M. W., Podolny, J., & Sullivan, B. 2008. Culture and coworker relations: Interpersonal patterns in American, Chinese, German, and Spanish divisions of a global retail bank. Organization Science, advance online publication 11 February. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0333.Google Scholar
  43. Ng, I., & Chow, I. H. 2005. Does networking with colleagues matter in enhancing job performance? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22 (4): 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oyserman, D. 1993. The lens of personhood: Viewing the self and others in a multicultural society. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (5): 993–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oyserman, D., & Markus, H. R. 1993. The sociocultural self. In J. Suls (Ed.), The self in social perspective: 187–220. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Pearce, J. L., & Robinson, R. B. 2000. Cultivating guanxi as a foreign investor strategy. Business Horizon, 43 (1): 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peng, Y. 2004. Kinship networks and entrepreneurs in China's transitional economy. The American Journal of Sociology, 109 (5): 1045–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rao, A. K., Pearce, J. L., & Xin, K. 2005. Governments, reciprocal exchange, and trust among business associates. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (1): 104–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Redding, G., & Wong, G. Y. Y. 1986. The psychology of Chinese organizational behavior. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of Chinese people: 267–295. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. D. 1985. Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 (1): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sahlins, M. D. 1972. Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
  52. Sanchez-Burks, J. 2002. Protestant relational ideology and (in)attention to relational cues in work settings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (4): 919–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sanchez-Burks, J., Lee, F., Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., Zhao, S., & Koo, J. 2003. Conversing across cultures: East–West communication styles in work and nonwork contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (2): 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Silver, A. 1990. Friendship in commercial society: Eighteenth-century social theory and modern sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 95 (6): 1474–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tong, C. K., & Yong, P. K. 1998. Guanxi bases, Xinyong, and Chinese business networks. The British Journal of Sociology, 49 (1): 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  57. Triandis, H. C. 2001. Individualism–collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69 (6): 907–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trompenaars, A. 1994. Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  59. Tsui, A., & Farh, J. L. 1997. Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work Occupation, 24 (1): 56–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tsui, A., Farh, L., & Xin, C. 2004. Particularistic ties and structural holes in Chinese managerial networks. Working paper, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  61. Vanhonacker, W. R. 2004. Guanxi networks in China: How to be the spider, not the fly. The China Business Review, May–June: 48–53.Google Scholar
  62. Weber, M. 1904/1930. Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Winchester, MA: Allen & Unwin, Inc.Google Scholar
  63. Wellman, B., Chen, W., & Dong, W. 2001. Networking guanxi. In T. Gold, D. Guthrie & D. Wank (Eds), Social networks in China: Institutions, culture, and the changing nature of guanxi: 221–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. 2007. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52 (1): 1–31.Google Scholar
  65. Xin, K. R., & Pearce, J. L. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6): 1641–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yang, C. F. 1988. Familialism and development: An examination of the role of family in contemporary China mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In D. Sinha & H. S. R. Kao (Eds), Social values and development: Asian perspectives: 93–123. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Yang, H., Van de Vliert, E., & Shi, K. 2005. Siding in a workplace dispute in China: The impact of legitimacy, sanction, and guanxi. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5 (3): 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yang, K. S. 1992. Chinese social orientation: From the social interaction perspective. In K. S. Yang & A. B. Yu (Eds), Chinese psychology and behavior: 87–142. Taipei, Taiwan: Laurel.Google Scholar
  69. Yang, K. S. 1998. Familization, pan-familism, and organization management. In B.-S. Cheng, K.-L. Huang & C.-C. Kuo (Eds), The management in Taiwan and China, Vol. 4: Chinese legacies and management in Taiwan and China: 19–60. Taipei, Taiwan: Yuan-Liou Publishing.Google Scholar
  70. Yang, M. M. 1994. Gifts, favors, and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Yeung, I. Y. M., & Tung, R. L. 1996. Achieving business success in Confucian societies: The importance of guanxi (connections). Organizational Dynamics, 25 (2): 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zelizer, V. A. 2005. The purchase of intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Zucker, L. G. 1986. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 8: 53–111. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard Business SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Columbia University, Columbia Business SchoolNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations