Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 337–350 | Cite as

Perspectives on China's outward foreign direct investment

Perspective

Abstract

Recent economic data reveal that, at the infant stage, China's outward foreign direct investment (FDI) is biased towards tax havens and Southeast Asian countries and are mostly conducted by state-controlled enterprises with government sanctioned monopoly status. Further examination of China's savings rate, corporate ownership structures, and bank-dominated capital allocation suggests that, although a surge in China's outward FDI might be economically sensible, the most active players have incentives to conduct excessive outward FDI while capital constraints limit players that most likely have value-creating FDI opportunities. We then discuss plausible firm-level justifications for China's outward FDI, its importance, and promising avenues for further research.

Keywords

outward foreign direct investment China macro perspective corporate ownership structure capital market distortion micro firm theory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for helpful comments from William Allen, Jun Huang, Tom Pugel, Alan Rugman, Myles Shaver, Jordan Siegel, Changqi Wu, the Editor Arie Lewin, and two anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. 2005. Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77 (1): 57–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayyagari, M., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. 2007. Formal vs informal finance: Evidence from China. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4465, March 2007.Google Scholar
  3. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casson, M. 1995. The organization of international business. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F., & Hines Jr., J. R. 2004. A multinational perspective on capital structure choice and internal capital markets. Journal of Finance, 59 (6): 2451–2488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dollar, D., & Wei, S. 2007. Das (wasted) kapital: Firm ownership and investment efficiency in China. NBER Working Paper No. 13103, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Financial Statistics Yearbook. 2005. The People's Bank of China, Beijing.Google Scholar
  8. Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94 (4): 691–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, D. G. 1993. The impact of US tax law revision on multinational corporations’ capital location and income-shifting decisions.Journal of Accounting Research, 31 (Supplement): 111–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang, Y., Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 2004. ASEAN and FTAA: External threats and internal institutional weaknesses. Business and Politics, 6 (1): http://www.bepress.com/bap/vol6/iss1/art4/.
  11. Jensen, M. C. 1986. The agency costs of free cash flow: Corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76 (2): 323–339.Google Scholar
  12. Khanna, T. 2000. Business groups and social welfare in emerging markets: Existing evidence and unanswered questions. European Economic Review, 44 (4–6): 748–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. 2006. Emerging giants: Building world-class companies in developing countries. Harvard Business Review, 84 (10): 60–70.Google Scholar
  14. Kuijs, L. 2006. How will China's saving-investment balance evolve? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3958, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52 (3): 1131–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106 (6): 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 2000. Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55 (1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lipton, D., & Sachs, J. 1990. Privatization in Eastern Europe: The case of Poland. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2: 293–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morck, R., & Nakamura, M. 2000. Japanese corporate governance and macroeconomic problems. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Paper No. 1893, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 1991. Why investors value multinationality. 64 (2): 165–187.Google Scholar
  21. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 1992. Internalization: An event study test. Journal of International Economics, 33 (1–2): 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zhao, M. 2005. China's lucky corporate governance. Peking University Business Forum, Beijing.Google Scholar
  23. OECD 2005. Economic survey of China. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  24. Perkins, S. 2005. Does prior experience really pay? Foreign direct investments, institutional environments and firm performance. Doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  25. Rugman, A. M. 1996. The theory of multinational enterprises. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  26. Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 1992. A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (4): 761–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomas, S., & Ji, C. 2006. Banking on reform. China Business Review, http://www.chinabusinessreview.com/public/0605/thomas.html.
  28. Tsai, K. S. 2002. Back-alley banking: Private entrepreneurs in China. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Witt, M. A., & Lewin, A. Y. 2007. Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home country institutional constraints. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Finance and Management ScienceUniversity of Alberta and NBEREdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Stern School of Business, New York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Guanghua School of Management, Peking UniversityBeijingChina
  4. 4.Ross School of Business, University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations