- 155 Downloads
Alan Rugman and co-authors argue that globalisation, and with it global strategy, is a myth. This contention rests on a taxonomy of the world's largest firms based on their sales, showing an overwhelming share of home-regional firms. We question the rationales underpinning their classification scheme. When retesting the data using different schema we find that the original results are far from robust, with a significant share of firms attaining bi-regional or global status. Further longitudinal analysis shows that large firms increasingly are extending their sales beyond the home region. Our results defy regionalisation theory in its current form, and we call for refinements through further research.
Keywordsregionalisation globalisation semi-globalisation global strategy regional strategy triad
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Eric Quintane in compiling the data used in this paper. We also thank Editor-in-Chief Professor Arie Lewin and two anonymous JIBS reviewers for their efforts.
- Aharoni, Y. 1971. On the definition of a multinational corporation. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 11 (3): 27–37.Google Scholar
- Asmussen, C. G. 2006. Local, regional or global? Quantifying MNC geographic scope. SMG Working Paper 14/2006, Centre for Strategic Management and Globalization, Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
- Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Cembureau 2007. 2005 World cement production by region. http://www.cembureau.be/Documents/KeyFacts/STATISTICS/World%20Cement%20Production%20by%20Region.pdf. Accessed 24 March 2007.
- Economist 1997. One world?. 18 October: 79–81.Google Scholar
- Economist 2007. Billion dollar pills. 25 January: 61–64.Google Scholar
- Enright, M. 2005. Regional management centers in the Asia-Pacific. Management International Review, 45 (Special Issue 1): 59–82.Google Scholar
- Euromonitor 2000. Pharmaceuticals: A world survey. World market overview. Global Report, 2 June, Global Market Information Database. https://www.euromonitor.com/. Accessed 3 January 2007.
- Euromonitor 2005. The world market for dairy products. Global Report, 7 June, Global Market Information Database. https://www.euromonitor.com/. Accessed 3 January 2007.
- Ghemawat, P. 2001. Distance still matters. Harvard Business Review, 79 (8): 137–147.Google Scholar
- Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15 (4): 603–625.Google Scholar
- Nokia 2003. Nokia in 2002. http://www.nokia.com/A4126499. Accessed 28 March 2007.
- Ohmae, K. 1985. Triad power: The coming shape of global competition. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Osegowitsch, T., & Sammartino, A. 2007. Exploring trends in regionalisation. In A. M. Rugman (ed.), Research in global strategic management, vol. 13, Regional aspects of multinationality and performance. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 45–64.Google Scholar
- Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rugman, A. M. 2000. The end of globalization. London: Random House.Google Scholar
- Rugman, A. M., & Oh, C. H. 2007. Multinationality and regional performance, 2001–2005. In A. M. Rugman (ed.), Research in global strategic management, vol. 13, Regional aspects of multinationality and performance. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 31–43.Google Scholar
- Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2004b. Regional transnationals and triad strategy. Transnational Corporations, 13 (3): 1–19.Google Scholar
- Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2005. Towards a theory of regional multinationals: A transaction cost economics approach. Management International Review, 45 (Special Issue 1): 5–17.Google Scholar