Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 38, Issue 7, pp 1113–1131 | Cite as

International new ventures: revisiting the influences behind the ‘born-global’ firm



There is a small but theoretically important literature on ‘born-globals’ or international new venture firms that positions itself in contrast to the more established sequential international entry literature. In this paper we examine the pattern of entry into international markets for a set of international new ventures and show that they need not be a distinct breed of firms, as previous research has portrayed. Absent a specific technological advantage, the decision for a new venture to internationalize at inception is influenced by the size of its home market and by its production capacity, as well as by cultural and economic forces that also influence other more traditional firms that stage their entry into international markets. Most importantly, we demonstrate that the decision to internationalize or not should be considered jointly with the capacity allocation decision to specific international markets, as analysing these separately may lead to biased results.


international new ventures entrepreneurship strategy born-globals 



We are grateful for the invaluable research and computing support of the Lee Kong Chiang School of Business at Singapore Management University, as well as the methodological advice offered by Paul Vaaler at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The excellent research assistance of Benjamin Jin-Ming Tan is graciously acknowledged. We acknowledge financial support from the John H. Broadbent Endowment for Research in Entrepreneurship in the Lally School of Management and Technology at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Finally, we thank Henk W. Volberda and three very helpful anonymous reviewers, as well as participants at the Pre-conference Development Workshop of the Annual Conference for Corporate Strategy in 2006, for their invaluable advice and suggestions. Omissions and errors are our responsibilities alone.


  1. Autio, E., Sapienza, H. and Almeida, J. (2000) ‘Influences of age at entry, knowledge-intensity and imitability on growth’, Academy of Management Journal 43 (5): 909–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkema, H.G., Bell, J.H.J. and Pennings, J.M. (1996) ‘Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning’, Strategic Management Journal 17 (2): 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, J. (1995) ‘The internationalization of small computer software firms: a further challenge to “stage” theories’, European Journal of Marketing 29 (8): 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brett, J.M. and Okumura, T. (1998) ‘Inter- and intracultural negotiation: US and Japanese negotiators’, Academy of Management Journal 41 (5): 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brouthers, K.D. and Brouthers, L.E. (2001) ‘Explaining the national cultural distance paradox’, Journal of International Business Studies 32 (1): 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Busenitz, L.W. and Barney, J.B. (1997) ‘Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making’, Journal of Business Venturing 12 (1): 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R. and Tretheway, M.W. (1984) ‘Economies of density versus economies of scale: why trunk and local service airline costs differ’, Rand Journal of Economics 15 (4): 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, S.J. (1995) ‘International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: capability building through sequential entry’, Academy of Management Journal 38 (2): 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coval, J. and Moskowitz, T. (2001) ‘The geography of investment: informed trading and asset prices’, Journal of Political Economy 109 (4): 811–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunning, J.H. (1988) ‘The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions’, Journal of International Business Studies 19 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duranti, I., Ahearn, L., Cook-Gumperz, J., Gumperz, J., Darnell, R., Hymes D., Rumsey, A., Spitulink, D. and Van Dijk, T. (2003) ‘Language as culture in US anthropology: three paradigms’, Current Anthropology 44 (3): 323–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eden, L. and Miller, S.R. (2004) ‘Distance matters: liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy’, Advances in International Management 16: 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erez, M. and Earley, C. (1993) Culture, Self-identity, and Work, Oxford University Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Erramilli, M.K., Agarwal, S. and Kim, S.S. (1997) ‘Are firm-specific advantages location-specific too?’ Journal of International Business Studies 28 (4): 735–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan, T.P.-C. (2006) ‘Improvements in intra-European inter-city flight connectivity linking the United Kingdom and Ireland with continental Europe 1996–2004’, Journal of Transport Geography 14 (4): 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fan, T.P.-C. and Leung, W.F.R. (2005) ‘Price disparity based on trip origins: evidence on dense nonstop intercontinental air routes’, Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 4 (3): 252–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ganitsky, J. (1989) ‘Strategies for innate and adoptive exporters: lessons from Israel's case’, International Marketing Review 6 (5): 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greve, H.R. (1998) ‘Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: what you see is what you do’, Strategic Management Journal 19 (10): 967–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grinblatt, M. and Keloharju, M. (2001) ‘How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades’, Journal of Finance 56 (3): 1053–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harveston, P.D., Kedia, B.L. and Davis, P.S. (2000) ‘Internationalization of born global and gradual globalizing firms: the impact of the manager’, Advances in Competitive Research 8 (1): 92–99.Google Scholar
  21. Haveman, H.A. (1993) ‘Follow the leader: mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets’, Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (4): 593–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heckman, J.J. (1979) ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica 47 (1): 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hedlund, G. and Kverneland, A. (1985) ‘Are strategies for foreign markets changing? The case of Swedish investment in Japan’, International Studies of Management and Organization 15 (2): 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture's Consequences, Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  25. Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. and Sanders, G. (1990) ‘Measuring organizational cultures: a qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (2): 286–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hymer, S.H. (1960) The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  27. Hymer, S. (1968) ‘La Grande Firme Multinationale’, Revue Economique 14 (6): 949–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. (1977) ‘The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments’, Journal of International Business Studies 8 (1): 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.-E. (1990) ‘The mechanism of internationalization’, International Marketing Review 7 (4): 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johanson, J. and Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975) ‘The internationalization of the firm: four Swedish cases’, Journal of Management Studies 12 (3): 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jolly, V.K., Alahuta, M. and Jeannet, J.-P. (1992) ‘Challenging the incumbents: how high technology start-ups compete globally’, Journal of Strategic Change 1 (2): 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kandasaami, S. (1998) ‘Internationalisation of small- and medium-sized born-global firms: a conceptual model’, Graduate School of Management, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  33. Kandasaami, S. and Huang, X. (2000) ‘International marketing strategy of SMEs: a comparison of born-global vs non born-global firms in Australia’, Presented at the 45th International Conference on Small Business, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  34. Knight, G.A. (1997) ‘Emerging Paradigm for International Marketing: The Born Global Firm’, Ph.D Thesis, Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, Michigan State University: Michigan.Google Scholar
  35. Knight, G.A. and Cavusgil, S.T. (1996) ‘The Born Global Firm: A Challenge to Traditional Internationalization Theory’, in T.K. Madsen (ed.) Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 8, New York: JAI Press, pp: 11–26.Google Scholar
  36. Knight, G.A. and Cavusgil, S.T. (2004) ‘Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm’, Journal of International Business Studies 35 (2): 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kogut, B. and Singh, H. (1988) ‘The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode’, Journal of International Business Studies 19 (3): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lummaa, H.J. (2002) ‘Internationalization behaviour of Finnish-born global companies, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology.Google Scholar
  39. Luo, Y. and Peng, M.W. (1999) ‘Learning to compete in a transition economy: experience, environment and performance’, Journal of International Business Studies 30 (2): 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Madsen, T.K. and Servais, P. (1997) ‘The internationalization of born globals: an evolutionary process?’ International Business Review 6 (6): 561–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Madsen, T.K., Rasmussen, E. and Servais, P. (2000) ‘Differences and similarities between born globals and other types of exporters’, in A. Yaprak and H. Tütek (eds.) Globalization, the Multinational Firm, Vol. 10, JAI Press: Amsterdam, pp: 247–265.Google Scholar
  42. McDougall, P.P., Shane, S. and Oviatt, B.M. (1994) ‘Explaining the formation of international new ventures: the limits of theories from international business research’, Journal of Business Venturing 9 (3): 469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKinsey and Co. (1993) Emerging Exporters: Australia's High Value-Added Manufacturing Exporters, McKinsey and Company and the Australian Manufacturing Council: Melbourne.Google Scholar
  44. Melin, L. (1992) ‘Internationalization as a strategy process’, Strategic Management Journal 13 (Special Issue): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977) ‘Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mezias, S.J., Chen, Y.-R., Murphy, P., Biaggio, A., Chuawanlee, W., Hui, H., Okumura, T. and Starr, S. (2002) ‘National cultural distance as liability of foreignness: the issue of level of analysis’, Journal of International Management 8 (4): 407–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morosini, P., Shane, S. and Singh, H. (1998) ‘National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance’, Journal of International Business Studies 29 (1): 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Neter, J., Wasserman, W. and Kutner, M.H. (1985) Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design, Richard D Irwin: Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  49. Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (1984) ‘Language acquisition and socialization: three developmental stories and their implications’, in R. Shweder and R.A. LeVine (eds.) Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, Cambridge University: New York, NY, pp: 276–320.Google Scholar
  50. Oviatt, B.M. and McDougall, P.P. (1994) ‘Toward a theory of international new ventures’, Journal of International Business Studies 25 (1): 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Park, S.H. and Ungson, G.R. (1997) ‘The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution’, Academy of Management Journal 40 (2): 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Phan, P. (2004) ‘Entrepreneurship theory: possibilities and future directions’, Journal of Business Ventures 19 (5): 617–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rennie, M.W. (1993) ‘Global competitiveness: born global’, McKinsey Quarterly 4: 45–52.Google Scholar
  54. Rialp, A., Rialp, J. and Knight, G. (2005) ‘The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: what do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific inquiry?’ International Business Review 14 (1): 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saky-Addo, K. (2003) ‘US Socks made in Africa’, BBC News, [www document] (accessed 11 November 2005).
  56. Schwartz, S.H. (1999) ‘A theory of cultural values and some implications for work’, Applied Psychology: An International Review: 48 (1): 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shrader, R.C., Oviatt, B.M. and McDougall, P.P. (2000) ‘How new ventures exploit trade-offs among international risk factors: lessons for the accelerated internationalization of the 21st century’, Academy of Management Journal 43 (6): 1227–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Silverstein, M. (2004) ‘“Cultural” concepts and the language-culture nexus’, Current Anthropology 45 (5): 621–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965) ‘Organizations and social structure’, in J.G. March (ed.) Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand-McNally, pp: 148–150.Google Scholar
  60. Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D.A. and Russell, C.J. (2005) ‘The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: a meta-analysis’, Journal of International Business Studies 36 (2): 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Young, S. (1987) ‘Business strategy and the internationalization process: recent approaches’, Managerial and Decision Economics 8 (1): 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zaheer, S. and Mosakowski, E. (1997) ‘The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: a global study of survival in financial services’, Strategic Management Journal 18 (6): 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zahra, S.A. (1996) ‘Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining the moderating role of the firm's competitive environment’, Journal of Business Venturing 11 (3): 189–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zahra, S.A. (2005) ‘A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research’, Journal of International Business Studies 36 (1): 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002) ‘International entrepreneurship: the current status of the field and future research agenda’, in M. Hitt, D. Ireland, D. Sexton and M. Camp (eds.) Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating an Integrated Mindset, Strategic Management Series, Blackwell: Oxford, pp: 255–288.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Lally School of Management & Technology, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations