Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 259–282 | Cite as

Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation

  • Masaaki KotabeEmail author
  • Denise Dunlap-Hinkler
  • Ronaldo Parente
  • Harsh A Mishra
Article

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of international knowledge flow. From a resource-based perspective, it evaluates the impact of cross-national knowledge transfer on firm innovative performance. Based on 56,027 US patents owned by 53 selected firms in the US-based pharmaceutical industry, the results suggest that innovative performance is a curvilinear function of the international knowledge content used by a firm to innovate. As hypothesized, it was found that at (1) low and moderate levels of international knowledge content, a firm's strategy to transfer international knowledge improves its innovative performance, and at (2) higher levels of international knowledge content, there are diminishing marginal returns to transferring knowledge from overseas.

Keywords

knowledge management knowledge transfer multinational firm innovation international sourcing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the three JIBS reviewers and G. Tomas M. Hult for their constructive comments throughout the revision process.

References

  1. Abrahamson, E. and Fombrun, C.J. (1994) ‘Macrocultures: determinants and consequences’, Academy of Management Review 19(4): 728–755.Google Scholar
  2. Albert, M.B., Avery, D., McAllister, P. and Narin, F. (1991) ‘Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents’, Research Policy 20(3): 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida, P. (1996) ‘Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry’, Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter Special Issue): 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almeida, P., Song, J. and Grant, R. (2002) ‘Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building’, Organization Science 13(2): 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambrosini, V. and Bowman, C. (2001) ‘Tacit knowledge: some suggestions for operationalization’, Journal of Management Studies 38(6): 811–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersen, O. (1993) ‘On the internationalization process of firms: a critical analysis’, Journal of International Business Studies 24(2): 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andriani, P. (2001) ‘Diversity, knowledge and complexity theory: some introductory issues’, International Journal of Innovation Management 5(2): 257–275.Google Scholar
  8. Anon (1998) ‘CHI Research, Inc. Introduces tech-line analysis tool technology’, Information Today 15(9): 66.Google Scholar
  9. Arrow, K. (1962) ‘The economic implications of learning by doing’, Review of Economic Studies 29(3): 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Asakawa, K. (2001) ‘Evolving headquarters–subsidiary dynamics in international R&D: the case of Japanese multinationals’, R&D Management 31(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barney, J., Wright, M. and Ketchen Jr, D. (2001) ‘The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991’, Journal of Management 27(6): 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barney, J.B. (1991) ‘Looking inside for competitive advantage’, Academy of Management Executive 9(4): 49–61.Google Scholar
  13. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1989) Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1990) ‘Managing Innovation in the Transnational Corporation’, in C.A. Bartlett, Y. Doz and G. Hedlund (eds.) Managing the Global Firm, Routledge: New York, pp: 215–255.Google Scholar
  15. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) Managing Across Border: The Transnational Solution, 2nd edn Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Bergh, D.D. (1993) ‘Don’t “Waste” Your Time The effects of time series errors in management research: the case of ownership concentration and research and development spending’, Journal of Management 19(4): 897–914.Google Scholar
  17. Birkinshaw, J. and Hood, N. (2001) ‘Unleash innovation in foreign subsidiaries’, Harvard Business Review 79(3): 131–137.Google Scholar
  18. Bresnman, H., Birkinshaw, J. and Nobel, R. (1999) ‘Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions’, Journal of International Business Studies 30(3): 439–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buckley, P.J. and Carter, M.J. (1999) ‘Managing cross-border complementary knowledge’, International Studies of Management and Organization 29(1): 80–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Calori, R., Johnson, G. and Sarnin, P. (1994) ‘CEOs’ cognitive maps and the scope of the organization’, Strategic Management Journal 15(6): 437–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cantwell, J.A. (1989) Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations, Basil Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Cantwell, J.A. (1992) ‘The Internationalisation of Technological Activity and Its Implications for Competitiveness’, in O. Grandstand, L. Hakanson and S. Sjolander (eds.) Technology Management and International Business Internationalisation of R&D and Technology, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, pp: 75–95.Google Scholar
  23. Cantwell, J. and Kotecha, U. (1997) ‘The Internationalization of Technological Activity: The French Evidence in a Comparative Setting’, in J. Howells and J. Michie (eds.) Technology, Innovation and Competitiveness, Edward Elgar: Aldershot, pp: 126–173.Google Scholar
  24. Carpenter, M.P. and Narin, F. (1983) ‘Validation study: patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence’, World Patent Information 5(3): 180–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Casson, M., Pearce, R.D. and Singh, S. (1992) ‘Business Culture and International Technology: Research Managers’ Perceptions of Recent Changes in Corporate R&D’, in O. Grandstand, L. Hakanson and S. Sjolander (eds.) Technology Management and International Business: Internationalization of R&D and Technology, John Wiley & Sons: New York, pp: 117–135.Google Scholar
  26. Caves, R. (1982) Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Caves, R.E. (1971) ‘International corporations: the industrial economics of foreign investment’, Economica 38(141): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cheng, J.L.C. and Bolon, D.S. (1993) ‘The management of multinational R&D: a neglected topic in international business research’, Journal of International Business Studies 24(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cheng, J.L.C. and Kesner, I.F. (1997) ‘Organizational slack and response to environment shifts: the impact of resource allocation patterns’, Journal of Management 23(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chiesa, V. (1996) ‘Strategies for global R&D’, Research Technology Management 39(5): 19–26.Google Scholar
  31. Chiesa, V. and Manzini, R. (1996) ‘Managing knowledge transfer within multinational firms’, International Journal of Technology Management 12(4): 462–476.Google Scholar
  32. Cockburn, I. and Griliches, Z. (1988) ‘Industry effects and appropriability measures in the Stock Market's valuation of R&D and patents’, American Economic Review 78(2): 419–423.Google Scholar
  33. Cohen, D. (1998) ‘Toward a knowledge context: report on the first annual UC Berkeley Forum on knowledge and the firm’, California Management Review 40(3): 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cohen, W. and Klepper, S. (1996) ‘A reprise of size and R & D’, Economic Journal 106(437): 925–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990) ‘Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cooper, R.G. (1979) ‘The dimensions of industrial new products success and failure’, Journal of Marketing 43(3): 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Cronbach, L.J. (1987) ‘Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed’, Psychological Bulletin 102(3): 414–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Daniels, J.D. and Brackner, J. (1989) ‘Profit performance: do foreign operations make a difference?’ Management International Review 29(1): 46–56.Google Scholar
  39. David, P.A. (1988) ‘Path-dependency: putting the past into the future’, Technical Report of The Economic Series No. 553, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, California, USA, November.Google Scholar
  40. Deeds, D.L., Decarolis, D. and Coombs, J. (1997) ‘The impact of timing and firm capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: evidence from the biotechnology industry’, Journal of Business Venturing 12(1): 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. DeSanctis, G., Glass, J.T. and Ensing, I.M. (2002) ‘Organizational designs for R&D’, Academy of Management Executive 16(3): 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Dosi, G. (1988) ‘The Nature of the Innovative Process’, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds.) Technical Change and Economic Theory, Francis Pinter: London, pp: 221–238.Google Scholar
  43. Dosi, G., Teece, D. and Winter, S. (1991) ‘Toward a Theory of Corporate Coherence’, in G. Dosi, G. Giannetti and P.A. Toninelli (eds.) Technology and the Enterprise in a Historical Perspective, Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp: 186–211.Google Scholar
  44. Dow, D. (2000) ‘A note on psychological distance and export market selection’, Journal of International Marketing 8(1): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dunning, J.H. (1980) ‘Towards an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical tests’, Journal of International Business Studies 11(1): 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Dunning, J.H. (1993) The Globalization of Business, Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  47. Dunning, J.H. (1998) ‘Location and the multinational enterprise: a neglected factor?’ Journal of International Business Studies 29(1): 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Evans, J. and Mavondo, F.T. (2002) ‘Psychic distance and organizational performance: an empirical examination of international retailing operations’, Journal of International Business Studies 33(3): 515–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Franko, L.G. (1989) ‘Global corporate competition: who's winning, who's losing and the R&D factor as one reason why’, Strategic Management Journal 10(5): 449–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Frost, T.S. (2001) ‘The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations’, Strategic Management Journal 22(2): 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Geringer, J.M., Beamish, P.W. and DaCosta, R.C. (1989) ‘Diversification strategy and internationalization: implications for MNE performance’, Strategic Management Journal 10(2): 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gersick, C.J. and Hackman, R.J. (1990) ‘Habitual routines in task-performing groups’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 47(1): 65–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ghoshal, S. (1987) ‘Global strategy: an organizing framework’, Strategic Management Journal 8(5): 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett, C. (1988) ‘Creation, adoption and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies 19(3): 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ghoshal, S. and Nohria, N. (1993) ‘Horses for courses: organizational forms for multinational corporations’, Sloan Management Review 34(2): 23–36.Google Scholar
  56. Glassman, O. (2001) ‘Multicultural teams: increasing creativity and innovation by diversity’, Creativity and Innovation Management 10(2): 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gomes, L. and Ramaswamy, K. (1999) ‘An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance’, Journal of International Business Studies 30(1): 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Granovetter, M.S. (1973) ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Grant, R.M. (1987) ‘Multinationality and performance among British Manufacturing Companies’, Journal of International Business Studies 18(3): 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Griliches, Z. (1981) ‘Market value, R&D and patents’, Economic Letters 7(2): 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. (1991) ‘Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations’, Academy of Management Review 16(4): 768–792.Google Scholar
  62. Haar, J.A. (1989) ‘Comparative analysis of the profitability performance of the largest US, European and Japanese Multinational Enterprises’, Management International Review 29(3): 5–18.Google Scholar
  63. Hakanson, L. and Nobel, R. (2001) ‘Organizational characteristics and reverse technology transfer’, Management International Review 41(4): 395–420.Google Scholar
  64. Hakanson, L. and Zander, U. (1988) ‘International management of R&D: the Swedish experience’, R&D Management 18(3): 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hall, B. (1993) ‘The stock market's valuation of R&D investment during the 1980s’, American Economic Review 83(2): 259–264.Google Scholar
  66. Hall, B., Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. (2000) ‘Market value and patent citations: a first look’, NBER, Working Paper Series, June 2000, revised June 2001, MIT Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  67. Hall, B., Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. (2005) ‘Market value and patent citations’, RAND Journal of Economics 36(1): 16–18.Google Scholar
  68. Hedlund, G. (1986) ‘The hypermodern MNC: a heterarchy?’ Human Resource Management 25(1): 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and Kim, H. (1997) ‘International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms’, Academy of Management Journal 40(4): 767–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Howells, J. (2000) ‘International coordination of technology flows and knowledge activity in innovation’, International Journal of Technology Management 19(7/8): 806–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hult, G.T., Ketchen, D.J. and Slater, S.F. (2002) ‘A longitudinal study of the learning climate and cycle time in supply chains’, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 17(4): 302–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hymer, S.H. (1976) ‘The international operations of national firms: a study of direct investment’, published PhD Dissertation (written in 1960), MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  73. IMS Global Insights (2006) ‘New Products and Markets Fuel Growth in 2005’, IMS Midas Quantum, [www document.] http://www.imshealth.com/web/content/0,3148,64576068_63872702_70260998_77974518,00.html. (accessed 6 June 2006).
  74. Iwasa, T. and Odagiri, H. (2004) ‘Overseas R&D, knowledge sourcing and patenting: an empirical study of Japanese R&D investment in the US’, Research Policy 33(5): 807–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M. and Forgarty, M.S. (2000) ‘Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: evidence from a survey of inventors’, American Economic Review 90(2): 215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R. (1993) ‘Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3): 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J.E. (1977) ‘The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments’, Journal of International Business Studies 8(1): 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Joyner, B.E. and Onken, M.H. (2002) ‘Communication technology in international technology transfer: breaking time and cost barriers’, American Business Review 20(2): 17–27.Google Scholar
  79. Kaufman, S. (1995) At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity, Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  80. Kim, W.C., Hwang, P. and Burgers, W.P. (1993) ‘Multinationals’ diversification and the risk-return tradeoff’, Strategic Management Journal 14(4): 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kogut, B. (1989) ‘A note on global strategies’, Strategic Management Journal 10(4): 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Kogut, B. and Singh, H. (1988) ‘The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode’, Journal of International Business Studies 19(3): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992) ‘Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology’, Organization Science 3(3): 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993) ‘Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation’, Journal of International Business Studies 24(4): 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kotabe, M. (1992) ‘A comparative study of the US and Japanese patent systems’, Journal of International Business Studies 23(1): 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kotabe, M. (1998) ‘Efficiency vs. effectiveness orientation of global sourcing strategy: a comparison of US and Japanese Multinational Companies’, Academy of Management Executive 12(4): 107–119.Google Scholar
  87. Kotabe, M. and Omura, G.S. (1989) ‘Sourcing strategies of European and Japanese Multinationals: a comparison’, Journal of International Business Studies 20(1): 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kumar, M.S. (1984) Growth, Acquisition and Investment, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  89. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) ‘Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development’, Strategic Management Journal 13(Summer Special Issue): 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995) Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  91. Levinthal, D.A. and March, J.G. (1993) ‘The myopia of learning’, Strategic Management Journal 14(Winter Special Issue): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Levitt, B. and March, J.G. (1988) ‘Organizational learning’, Annual Review of Sociology 14(Winter): 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Lilien, G.L., Morrison, P.D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M. and von Hippel, E. (2002) ‘Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development’, Management Science 48(8): 1042–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lord, M.D. and Ranft, A.L. (2000) ‘Organizational learning about new international markets: exploring the internal transfer of local market knowledge’, Journal of International Business Studies 31(4): 573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Lorenz, C. (1983) ‘Managing a $1 billion R&D budget’, Europe Profile 32: 15–17.Google Scholar
  96. Lundvall, B.A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Francis Pinter: London.Google Scholar
  97. Madhavan, R. and Grover, R. (1998) ‘From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: new product development as knowledge management’, Journal of Marketing 62(4): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Mansfield, E. and Romeo, A. (1980) ‘Technology transfer to overseas subsidiaries by US based firms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 95(4): 737–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. March, J.G. (1991) ‘Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning’, Organization Science 2(1): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Matraves, C. (1999) ‘Market structure, R&D and advertising in the pharmaceutical industry’, Journal of Industrial Economics 47(2): 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. McKern, B. (1993) ‘An Evolutionary Approach to Strategic Management in the International Firm’, in P. Lorange, B. Chakravarthy, J. Roos and A. Van de Ven (eds.) Implementing Strategic Processes: Change, Learning and Co-operation, Blackwell Publishers: Oxford, pp: 349–372.Google Scholar
  102. Mezias, S.J. and Glynn, M.A. (1993) ‘The three faces of corporate renewal: institution, revolution’, Strategic Management Journal 14(2): 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Michie, J. (1998) ‘Introduction: the internationalisation of the innovation process’, International Journal of the Economics of Business 5(3): 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Miller, D. and Chen, M.J. (1996) ‘The simplicity of competitive repertoires: an empirical analysis’, Strategic Management Journal 17(6): 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Morck, R. and Yeung, B. (1991) ‘Why investors value multinationality’, Journal of Business 64(2): 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E. and Silverman, B.S. (1998) ‘Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm’, Research Policy 27(5): 507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Nonaka, I. (1991) ‘The knowledge-creating company’, Harvard Business Review 69(6): 96–104.Google Scholar
  108. O’Grady, S. and Lane, H.W. (1996) ‘The psychic distance paradox’, Journal of International Business Studies 27(2): 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Ogawa, S. (1998) ‘Empirical studies of the sticky information hypothesis’, Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  110. Parise, S. and Henderson, J.C. (2001) ‘Knowledge resource exchange in strategic alliances’, IBM Systems Journal 40(4): 908–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1991) ‘Large firms in the production of the World's technology: an important case of “Non-Globalisation”’, Journal of International Business Studies 22(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Patel, V.L., Kaufman, D.R. and Madger, S.A. (1996) ‘The Acquisition of Medical Expertise in Complex Dynamic Environments’, in A. Ericsson (ed.) The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports and Games, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, pp: 127–165.Google Scholar
  113. Pavitt, K. (1988) ‘Uses and Abuses of Patent Statistics’, in A.F.J. van Raan (ed.) Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam, pp: 509–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Porter, M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Macmillan: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Porter, M.E. (1998) ‘Clusters and the new economics of competition’, Harvard Business Review 76(6): 77–90.Google Scholar
  116. Porter, M.E. and Stern, S. (2001) ‘Innovation: location matters’, Sloan Management Review 42(4): 28–37.Google Scholar
  117. Powell, W., Koput, K. and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) ‘Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology’, Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1): 116–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Prahalad, C.K. and Doz, Y. (1987) The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision, The Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
  119. Redding, S. (2002) ‘Path dependence, endogenous innovation and growth’, International Economic Review 43(4): 1215–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Roberts, P.W. (1999) ‘Product innovation, product–market competition and persistent profitability in the US’, Strategic Management Journal 20(7): 655–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Robinson, R.D. (1988) The International Transfer of Technology: Theory, Issues and Practice, Ballinger Publishing Company: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  122. Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horsley, A., Jervis, V.T.P., Robertson, A. and Townsend, J. (1974) ‘SAPPHO updated: project Sappho phase II’, Research Policy 3(3): 258–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sakakibara, M. and Porter, M.E. (2001) ‘Competing at home to win abroad: evidence from Japanese industry’, Review of Economics and Statistics 83(2): 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Scherer, F.M. (1982) ‘Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth’, Review of Economics and Statistics 64(4): 627–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Simon, H.A. (1955) ‘A behavioral model of rational choice’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Simon, H.A. (1985) ‘What We Know About the Creative Process’, in R.L. Kuhn (ed.) Frontiers in Creative and Innovative Management, Ballinger: Cambridge, pp: 3–20.Google Scholar
  127. Song, J., Almeida, P. and Wu, G. (2003) ‘Learning-by-hiring: when is mobility likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer?’ Management Science 49(4): 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Song, J. and Shin, J. (2002) ‘The Paradox of Technological Capabilities: What Determines Knowledge Sourcing from Overseas R&D Operations’, Proceedings of the 28th European International Business Academy (EIBA) Conference, Athens.Google Scholar
  129. Stock, G.N., Greis, N.P. and Fischer, W.A. (2001) ‘Absorptive capacity and new product development’, Journal of High Technology Management Research 12(1): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Swamidass, P.M. and Kotabe, M. (1993) ‘Component sourcing strategies of multinationals: an empirical investigation’, Journal of International Business Studies 24(1): 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Taggart, J.H. (1991) ‘Determinants of the foreign R&D locational decision in the pharmaceutical industry’, R&D Management 21(3): 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Teece, D. (1988) ‘Technological Change and the Nature of the Firm’, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds.) Technical Change and Economic Theory, Francis Pinter: London, pp: 256–281.Google Scholar
  133. Trajtenberg, M. (1990) ‘A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations’, RAND Journal of Economics 21(1): 172–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Trent, R.J. and Monczka, R.M. (2002) ‘Pursuing competitive advantage through integrated global sourcing’, Academy of Management Executive 16(2): 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development (2006) ‘Outlook 2006’, [www document.] http://csdd.tufts.edu/InfoServices/OutlookPDFs/Outlook2006.pdf. (accessed 5 June 2006).
  136. United Kingdom Department of Trade and Industry (2002) ‘R&D Scoreboard’, [www document.] http://www.innovation.gov.uk/projects/rd_scoreboard/introfr.html. (accessed 5 December 2002).
  137. Vernon, R. (1966) ‘International investment and international trade in the product cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(2): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. von Hippel, E. (1998) ‘Economics of product development by users: the impact of “Sticky” local information’, Management Science 44(5): 629–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Walsh, J.P. (1995) ‘Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane’, Organization Science 6(3): 280–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wernerfelt, B. (1984) ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Winter, S.G. (1987) ‘Natural Selection and Evolution’, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds.) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Macmillan: London, pp: 614–617.Google Scholar
  142. Zahra, S.A., Ireland, R.D. and Hitt, M.A. (2000) ‘International expansions by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning and performance’, Academy of Management Journal 43(5): 925–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Zander, I. (1997) ‘Technological diversification in the multinational corporation: historical evolution and future prospects’, Research Policy 26(2): 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masaaki Kotabe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Denise Dunlap-Hinkler
    • 2
  • Ronaldo Parente
    • 3
  • Harsh A Mishra
    • 4
  1. 1.The Fox School of Business and Management, Temple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Widener UniversityChesterUSA
  3. 3.School of Business, Rutgers UniversityCamdenUSA
  4. 4.School of Business, State University of New YorkNew PaltzUSA

Personalised recommendations