Advertisement

Journal of International Business Studies

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 177–199 | Cite as

Some macro-data on the regionalisation/globalisation debate: a comment on the Rugman/Verbeke analysis

  • John H Dunning
  • Masataka Fujita
  • Nevena Yakova
Article

Abstract

This paper critiques an earlier contribution by Rugman and Verbeke (2004); and it does so by considering the global distribution of foreign direct investment (FDI). It also adds several new dimensions to the regionalisation/globalisation debate, noticeably by (i) the incorporation of inward multinational enterprise (MNE) activity, (ii) evaluating changes in the geography of FDI between 1990 and 2003, and (iii) the introduction of the concept of revealed investment comparative advantage (RICA) of countries and regions. While broadly supporting the findings of Rugman and Verbeke, our paper shows that much of the explanation for the regional concentration of FDI and MNE activity reflects that of the gross domestic product (GDP) and trade of the countries concerned, rather than any distinctive strategy on the part of investing firms.

Keywords

Rugman and Verbeke FDI regionalization and globalization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Arie Y Lewin and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on an earlier version of this article. The authors are also grateful to Lizanne Martinez for statistical assistance. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of their respective organisation.

References

  1. Buckley, P.J. and Ghauri, P.N. (2004) ‘Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises’, Journal of International Business Studies 35 (2): 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dunning, J.H. (1998) ‘Location and the multinational enterprise: a neglected factor’, Journal of International Business Studies 29 (1): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunning, J.H. (2002) ‘Globalising europe: the overall picture’, in T.L. Brewer, P.A. Brenton and G. Boyd (eds.) Globalising Europe, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, pp. 43–61.Google Scholar
  4. Dunning, J.H. (2004) ‘Determinants of foreign direct investment: globalisation induced changes and the role of policies’, in World Bank (ed.) Proceedings of Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics (Europe 2003) World Bank: Washington, pp. 279–290.Google Scholar
  5. Dunning, J.H. (2006) ‘Towards a new paradigm of development: implications for the determinants of international business activity’, Transnational Corporations 15 (1): 173–227.Google Scholar
  6. Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) (2003) World Investment Prospects: The Future of FDI: Globalisation or Regionalisation, EIU: London.Google Scholar
  7. Enright, M. (2003) ‘Regional clusters: what we know and what we should know’, in J. Brocker, D. Dohse and R. Soltwedel (eds.) Innovation Clusters and Inter-regional Competition, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 99–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ietto-Gillies, G. (1998) ‘Different conceptual frameworks for the assessment of the degree of internationalisation: an empirical analysis of various indices for the top 100 transnational corporations’, Transnational Corporations 7 (1): 17–35.Google Scholar
  9. Japan, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2004) Dai 32-kai Wagakuni Kigyo no Kaigai Jigyo Katsudo, METI: Tokyo.Google Scholar
  10. Oesterle, J.-J. and Fisch, J.H. (2000) ‘Globalisation Can Be Measured: Unveiling Tales of Mystery and Globalisation with a New Integrative and Metric Measurement Concept’, Paper presented to the 26th Annual Conference of the European International Business Academy, Maastricht.Google Scholar
  11. Ozawa, T. (2005) Institutions, Industrial Upgrading and Economic Performance in Japan, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Petri, P.A. (1994) ‘The regional clustering of foreign and direct investment and trade’, Transnational Corporations 3 (3): 1–24.Google Scholar
  13. Porter, M.E. (1998) On Competition, Harvard Business School Press: Boston.Google Scholar
  14. Ronen, S. and Shenkar, O. (1985) ‘Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: a review and synthesis’, Academy of Management Review 10 (3): 435–454.Google Scholar
  15. Rugman, A.M. (2000) The End of Globalisation, Random House: London.Google Scholar
  16. Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (2004) ‘A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises’, Journal of International Business Studies 35 (1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shenkar, O. (2001) ‘Cultural distance reconsidered: towards a more rigorous conceptualisation and measurement of cultural difference’, Journal of International Business Studies 32 (3): 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sullivan, D. (1994) ‘Measuring the degree of internationalisation of a firm’, Journal of International Business Studies 25 (2): 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thrift, N. (2000) ‘Pandora's box? Cultural geographies of economics’, in G.L. Clark, M.P. Feldman and M.S. Gertler (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 689–704.Google Scholar
  20. UNCTAD (1993) World Investment Report 1993: Transnational Corporations and Integrated International Production, UN: New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
  21. UNCTAD (2000) World Investment Report 2000: Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions and Development, UN: New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
  22. UNCTAD (2001) World Investment Report 2001. FDI Policies for Development, National and International Perspectives, UN: New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
  23. UNCTAD (2004) World Investment Report 2004: The Shift Towards Services, UN: New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
  24. UNCTAD (2005) World Investment Report 2005: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D, UN: New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
  25. UNCTAD (2006) World Investment Report 2006, FDI from Developing and Transition Economics: Implications for Development, UN: New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
  26. United States Department of Commerce (2004) US Direct Investment Abroad: Final Results from the 1999 Benchmark Survey, US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Van den Berghe, D. and Van Tulder, R. (2002) ‘The geography of foreign direct investment: a tripartite approach’, Journal of International Business and Economy 3 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
  28. Van Tulder, R., Van den Berghe, D. and Muller, A. (2001) Erasmus (Scoreboard) of Core Companies: The World's 20 Largest Firms and Internationalisation, Rotterdam School of Management/Erasmus University: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  29. Xu, D. and Shenkar, O. (2002) ‘Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise’, Academy of Management Review 27 (4): 608–618.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of International Business 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • John H Dunning
    • 1
  • Masataka Fujita
    • 2
  • Nevena Yakova
    • 3
  1. 1.Reading University Business SchoolReadingUK
  2. 2.Investment Trends Section, United Nations Conference on Trade and DevelopmentGenevaSwitzerland
  3. 3.Rutgers UniversityNew JerseyUSA

Personalised recommendations