IMF Staff Papers

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 191–219 | Cite as

Current Account Deficits in Rich Countries

  • Olivier Blanchard


Current account imbalances have increased steadily in rich countries over the past 20 years. While the U.S. current account deficit dominates the numbers and the news, other countries, especially within the euro area, are also running large deficits. These deficits are different from the Latin American deficits of the early 1980s, or the Mexican deficit of the early 1990s. They involve rich countries; they reflect mostly private saving and investment decisions, and fiscal deficits often play a marginal role; and the deficits are financed mostly through equity, FDI foreign direct investment, and own-currency bonds rather than through bank lending. Yet there appears to be a widely shared concern that these deficits are too large, and government intervention is required. My purpose is to examine the logic of this argument. I ask the following question: Assume that deficits reflect private saving and investment decisions. Assume also that people and firms have rational expectations. Should the government intervene, and, if so, how? To answer the question, I construct a simple benchmark. In the benchmark, the outcome is “first best” and there is no need nor justification for government intervention. I then introduce simple distortions in either goods, labor, or financial markets, and characterize the equilibrium in each case. I derive optimal policy and the implications for the current account. I show that optimal policy may or may not lead to smaller current account deficits. I see the model and the extensions very much as a first pass. Sharper conclusions require a better understanding of the exact nature and the extent of distortions, which we do not have yet. Such understanding is needed, however, to improve the quality of the current debate.

JEL Classifications

F40 E62 


  1. Bernanke, Ben, 2005, “The Global Saving Glut and the U.S. Current Account Deficit,” Sandridge Lecture, Virginia Association of Economics, Richmond, Virginia, March.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchard, Olivier, 2006, “Adjustment within the Euro: The Difficult Case of Portugal,” MIT Economics Working Paper No. 06-04 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Available via the Internet: Also published in Portuguese Economic Journal, February 2007.
  3. Blanchard, Olivier, and Francesco Giavazzi, 2006, “Rebalancing Growth in China. A Three-Handed Approach.” China & the World Economy, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, Olivier, and Francesco Giavazzi, and Filipa Sa, 2005, “International Investors, the U.S. Current Account, and the Dollar,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, Brookings Institution, pp. 1–65.Google Scholar
  5. Brender, Anton, and Florence Pisani, 2007, Les Déséquilibres Financiers Internationaux, (Paris, La Découverte).Google Scholar
  6. Caballero, Ricardo, Emmanuel, Farhi, and Pierre-Olivier, Gourinchas, 2006, “An Equilibrium Model of “Global Imbalances” and Low Interest Rates,” MIT Working Paper 06-02 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Available via the Internet:
  7. Caballero, Ricardo and Mohamad Hammour, 2005, “The Cost of Recessions Revisited: A Reverse-Liquidationist View.” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 72 (April), pp. 313–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caballero, Ricardo, and Arvind Krishnamurthy, 2002, A Dual Liquidity Model for Emerging Markets. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 92 (May), pp. 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caballero, Ricardo, and Guido Lorenzoni, 2006, “Persistent Appreciations, Overshooting, and Optimal Exchange Rate Interventions,” (unpublished; Cambridge, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, October). Available via the Internet:
  10. Calvo, Guillermo, Alejandro Izquierdo, and Ernesto Talvi, 2006, “Phoenix Miracles in Emerging Markets: Recovering Without Credit from Systemic Financial Crises,” NBER Working Paper 12101 (Cambridge, Massachusetts, National Bureau of Economic Research, March).Google Scholar
  11. Cline, William, 2005, The United States as a Debtor Nation (Washington, Institute for International Economics).Google Scholar
  12. Devereux, Michael, and Charles Engel, 2006, “Expenditure Switching Versus Real Exchange Rate Stabilization: Competing Objectives for Exchange Rate Policy,” NBER Working Paper No. 12215. (Cambridge, Massachusetts, National Bureau of Economic Research, May).Google Scholar
  13. Dornbusch, Rudiger, 1983, Real Interest Rates, Home Goods, and Optimal External Borrowing. Journal of Political Economy Vol. 91 (February), pp. 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards, Sebastian, 2002, “Does the Current Account Matter?” In: Sebastian Edwards and Jeffrey Frankel (eds). Preventing Currency Crises in Emerging Markets, (Chicago, University of Chicago Press), pp. 21–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krugman, Paul, 1987, The Narrow Moving Band, the Dutch Disease and the Competitive Consequences of Mrs Thatcher. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 27, pp. 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Obstfeld, Maurice and Kenneth Rogoff 1996, Foundations of International Macroeconomics. (Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Monetary Fund 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivier Blanchard

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations