Advertisement

Feminist Review

, Volume 82, Issue 1, pp 27–49 | Cite as

independence, dependency and interdependence: struggles and resistances of minoritized women within and on leaving violent relationships

  • Khatidja Chantler
Themed Article

Abstract

This paper draws on research conducted in Manchester, UK, examining service responses to African, African-Caribbean, Irish, Jewish and South Asian women experiencing domestic violence (Batsleer et al., 2002). Popular discourses of domestic violence, which also feature in services, are underpinned by ‘victim-blaming’ together with an assumption that women only show agency and control when they leave violent relationships, and/or what are constructed as oppressive minority cultures. Contrary to these perceptions, firstly, I note competing notions ascribed to ‘independence’. Secondly, I highlight the strategies of resistance used by minoritized women whether they stay, or leave, abusive relationships, and examine the inter-relationships between gender, class and culture. Thirdly, I outline the level and type of support on offer, including key barriers and dilemmas to accessing sensitive and relevant services that respond to women's positions of minoritization, focusing particularly on refuge or shelter provision as they offer one of the key points of transition for women using domestic violence services. Lastly, I indicate some positive steps that can be taken by helping agencies to respond more appropriately to minoritized women facing domestic violence.

Keywords

minoritization independence resistance refuges ethics of care 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Erica Burman for her insightful comments and suggestions, which have contributed to shaping this article.

References

  1. Amos, V. and Parmar, P. (1984) ‘Challenging imperial feminism’ Feminist Review, Vol. 17: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batsleer, J., Burman, E., Chantler, K., McIntosh, S.H., Pantling, K., Smailes, S. and Warner, S. (2002) Domestic Violence and Minoritisation: Supporting Women to Independence, Manchester: Women's Studies Research Centre, The Manchester Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
  3. Benhabib, S. (1987) ‘The generalised and the concrete other: The Kohlberg–Gilligan controversy and feminist theory’ in S. Benhabib, D. Cornell (1987) editors, Feminism as Critique: Essays on the Politics of Gender in Late-Capitalist Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. British Crime Survey (1996) London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  5. Burman, E. and Chantler, K. (2005) ‘Domestic violence and minoritisation: legal and policy barriers facing minoritised women leaving violent relationships’ International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, Vol. 28, No. 1: 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burman, E., Smailes, S. and Chantler, K. (2004) ‘Culture’ as a barrier to domestic violence services for minoritised women’ Critical Social Policy, Vol. 24, No. 3: 332–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carby, H. (1982) Schooling in Babylon and White Women Listen! Black Feminism and the Boundaries of Sisterhood in CCCS, The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in ‘70's Britain, London: Hutchinson University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Card, C. (1991) editor, Feminist Ethics, Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chantler, K., Aslam, H., Bashir, C., Darrell, J., Patel, K. and Steele, C. (1998) An Analysis of Present Drug service Delivery to Black Communities in Greater Manchetser, Manchester: Greater Manchester Drug Action Partnership and the Black Drug Workers Forum.Google Scholar
  10. Chantler, K., Burman, E., Batsleer, J. and Bashir, C. (2001) Attempted Suicide and Self-harm – South Asian Women, Manchester: Women's Studies Research Centre, the Manchester Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
  11. Chodorow, N. (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clement, G. (1996) Care, Autonomy and Justice: Feminism and the Ethic of Care, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, S. (2001) Immigration Controls, the Family and the Welfare State, London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  14. Crawford, M. (1995) Talking Difference: On Gender and Language, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, M. (1995) ‘Beyond caring: the de-moralization of gender’ in V. Held (1995) editor, Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice, Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Goldner, V., Penn, P., Sheinberg, M. and Walker, G. (1990) ‘Love and violence: gender paradoxes in volatile attachments’ Family Process, Vol. 29, No. 4: 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haaken, J . and Yragui, N. (2003) ‘Going underground: conflicting perspectives on domestic violence shelter practices’ Feminism & Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 1: 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hare-Mustin, R. and Merecek, J. (1986) ‘Autonomy and gender: some questions for therapists’ Psychotherapy, Vol. 23: 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hekman, S. (1995) Moral Voices, Moral Selves: Carol Gilligan and Feminist Moral Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly, L. and Humphreys, C. (2000) ‘Reducing Domestic Violence…What Works? Outreach and Advocacy Approaches’ Policing & Reducing Crime Briefing Note, London: Policing & Reducing Crime Unit, Home Office.Google Scholar
  22. Maynard, M. and Winn, J. (1997) ‘Women, violence and male power’ in Robinson, V. and Richardson, D. (1997) editors, Introducing Women's Studies, 2nd edition, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Phoenix, A. (1987) ‘Theories of gender and black families’ in G. Weiner, M. Arnot (1987) editors, Gender Under Scrutiny, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  24. Raphael, J. (1999) ‘Keeping women poor: how domestic violence prevents women from leaving welfare and entering the world of work’ in A. Brandwein (1999) editor, Battered Women, Children and Welfare Reform, The Ties that Bind, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Robinson, F. (1999) Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory and International Relations, Boulder, CO and Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rose, N. (1990) Governing the Soul: the Shaping of the Private Self, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Stainton Rogers, W. and Stainton Rogers, R. (2001) The Psychology of Gender and Sexuality, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tronto, J. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Feminist Review Ltd 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khatidja Chantler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations