Feminist Review

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 46–64 | Cite as

Contextual politics of difference in transnational care: the rhetoric of Filipina domestics' employers in Taiwan

  • Shu-Ju Ada Cheng
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The construction of foreign domestics as ‘Others’ has been a critical process to the globalization of domestic service. While the globalization of domestic service has been associated with a transnational female labour force, the transnational labour system has always been reconstituted as a new labour regime consistent with local particularity. In this article, I examine how Taiwanese employers discursively construct the otherness of their Filipina domestics. I argue that Taiwanese employers construct and naturalize the otherness of foreign domestics utilizing national identities, racial characteristics, and nationally based class difference. These differences, integral to the racialization of foreign domestics, are central not only to the persistence of their servitude at home but also to their social and political marginalization in the host society as a whole. The localization of a transnational labour force necessitates the examination of the contextual politics of difference. Rather than speaking of the universalized experience of foreign domestics, the contextual politics of difference provides a comparative framework for understanding not only the relational but also the contextual nature of identity construction. It demonstrates how difference is localized in the transnational system of care and how the localization of difference serves to reproduce social and global inequality.

Keywords

globalization domestic service Taiwan citizenship racialization Filipinas 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (2000) Doing the Dirty Work?: The Global Politics of Domestic Labour, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  3. Anthias, F. and Yuval-Davis, N. (1992) Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bakan, A. and Stasiulis, D. (1995) ‘Making the match: domestic placement agencies and the racialization of women's household work’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 20, No. 2: 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng, S.A. (2003) ‘Rethinking the globalization of domestic service: foreign domestics, state control, and the politics of identity in Taiwan’ Gender & Society, Vol. 17, No. 2: 166–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, P.H. (1991) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Constable, N. (1997) Maid to Order in Hong Kong, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Council of Labor Affairs, Executive Yuan. (1999) Chong Hua Min Guo Ba Qi Nian Tai Wan Di Qu Wai Ji Lao Gong Yun Yong Ji Guan Li Diao Cha Bao Gao (The Investigative Report on the Deployment and Management of Taiwan's Foreign Labor in 1998), Taipei: Council of Labor Affairs, Executive Yuan.Google Scholar
  9. Dickey, S. (2000) ‘Mutual Exclusions: Domestic Workers and Employers on Labor, Class, and Character in South India’ in K.M. Adams and S. Dickey (2000) editors, Home and Hegemony: Domestic Service and Identity Politics in South and Southeast Asia, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 31–62.Google Scholar
  10. Folbre, N. (2001) The Invisible Heart, New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  11. Mattingly, D.J. (2001) ‘The home and the world: domestic service and international networks of caring labor’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 91, No. 2: 370–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Memmi, A. (2000) Racism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Palmer, P. (1989) Domesticity and Dirt: Housewives and Domestic Servants in the United States, 1920–1945, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Parreñas, R.S. (2000) ‘Migrant Filipina domestic workers and the international division of reproductive labor’ Gender and Society, Vol. 14, No. 4: 560–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parreñas, R.S. (2001) ‘Transgressing the nation-state: the partial citizenship and ‘imagined (global) community’, of migrant Filipina domestic workers’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 26, No. 4: 1129–1154.Google Scholar
  16. Pratt, G. (1997) ‘Stereotypes and ambivalence: the construction of domestic workers in Vancouver, British Columbia’, Gender, Place and Culture, Vol. 4, No. 2: 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pratt, G. (1999) ‘Is this Canada? Domestic workers’ experiences in Vancouver BC’ in J.H. Momsen (1999) editor, Gender, Migration and Domestic Service, New York: Routledge, 23–42.Google Scholar
  18. Rollins, J. (1985) Between Women: Domestics and Their Employers, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sassen, S. (1996) Losing Control?: Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Stasiulis, D. and Bakan, A. (1997) ‘Negotiating citizenship: the case of foreign domestics in Canada’ Feminist Review, Autumn, No. 57: 112–139.Google Scholar
  21. Stiell, B. and England, K. (1997) ‘Domestic distinctions: constructing difference among paid domestic workers in Toronto’ Gender, Place and Culture, Vol. 4, No. 3: 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stiell, B. and England, K. (1999) ‘Jamaican Domestics, Filipina Housekeepers and English Nannies: Representations of Toronto's Foreign Domestic Workers’ in J.H. Momsen (1999) editor, Gender, Migration and Domestic Service, New York: Routledge, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Truong, T.D. (1996) ‘Gender, international migration and social reproduction: implications for theory, policy, research and networking’ Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1: 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Feminist Review Ltd 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shu-Ju Ada Cheng

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations