Advertisement

Feminist Review

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 26–45 | Cite as

Sex trafficking in women from Central and East European countries: promoting a ‘victim-centred’ and ‘woman-centred’ approach to criminal justice intervention

  • Jo Goodey
Article

abstract

Since the collapse of the Berlin wall, women and girls have been trafficked from central and eastern Europe to work as prostitutes in the European Union. This paper looks at the response of the international community to the problem of sex trafficking as it impacts on the EU. The focus is on criminal justice intervention with respect to protection of and assistance to ‘victims’, and a specially witness protection, in the light of the following: the tensions and promises between treatment of trafficked women as ‘victims’ of crime and criminal justice informants; and the need to re-focus on a ‘woman-centred’ approach to criminal justice intervention for trafficked women. Given the diverse nature of law and criminal justice practice between EU Member States, the paper necessarily presents a generic critique of current EU and international ‘best practice’ recommendations, with some commentary on practice based on the author's research, with respect to what ‘gold standards’ of practice offer in theory and what is delivered in reality. The question of ‘victim-centred’ justice and/or ‘woman-centred’ justice is raised in an effort to promote effective policy recommendations.

Keywords

nature of trafficking EU policy witness protection victim-centred woman-centred good practice 

References

  1. Apap, J. (2002) ‘Counteracting Human Trafficking – Protecting the Victims of Trafficking’. European Conference on Preventing and Combating Trafficking in Human Beings: Global Challenge for the 21st Century, Brussels: European Parliament, 18–20 September 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Brienen, M. and Hoegen, E. (2000) Victims of crime in twenty-two European jurisdictions, Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant, Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Productions.Google Scholar
  3. Crawford, A. and Goodey, J. editors, (2000) Integrating a Victim Perspective within Criminal Justice: International Perspectives, Dartmouth: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Ellison, L. (2001) The Adversarial Process and the Vulnerable Witness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fyfe, N. (2001) Protecting Intimidated Witnesses, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Goodey, J. (2000) ‘Non-EU citizens experiences of offending and victimisation: the case for comparative European research’. The European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, No. 1: 13–34.Google Scholar
  7. Goodey, J. (2002) ‘Whose insecurity? Organised crime, its victims and the EU’. In A. Crawford (2002) editor, Crime and Insecurity; the Governance of Safety in Europe, Willan, 135–158.Google Scholar
  8. Goodey, J. (2003a) ‘Migration, crime and victimhood: responses to sex trafficking in the EU’. Journal of Punishment and Society, Vol. 5, No. 4: 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodey, J. (2003b) ‘Recognising organised crime's victims: the case of sex trafficking in the EU’. In A. Edwards and P. Gill (2003b) editors, Transnational Organised Crime: Perspectives on Global Security, London: Routledge, 157–173.Google Scholar
  10. Goodey, J. (2003c) ‘Sex Trafficking in the European Union: Comparative and Cross-National Dilemmas for Research’. In J. Sheptycki and A. Wardak (2003c) editors, Transnational and Comparative Criminology, Oxford: Clarendon, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  11. Goodey, J. (2003d) ‘Promoting good practice in sex trafficking cases’. International Review of Victimology, (Special issue on Trafficking), forthcoming.Google Scholar
  12. Holmes, P. (2002) ‘Law Enforcement Co-operation with Non-Governmental Organisations, with reference to the Protection of Victims and Victims as Witnesses’. European Conference on Preventing and Combating Trafficking in Human Beings: Global Challenge for the 21st Century, Brussels: European Parliament, 18–20 September 2002.Google Scholar
  13. IOM (1995) Trafficking and Prostitution: The Growing Exploitation of Migrant Women from Central and Eastern Europe, Geneva: IOM.Google Scholar
  14. IOM (1996) Trafficking in Women to Austria for Sexual Exploitation, Geneva: IOM.Google Scholar
  15. Kartusch (2001) Reference Guide for Anti-Trafficking Legislative Review: With Particular Emphasis on South Eastern Europe, Vienna: Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights/OSCE.Google Scholar
  16. Kelly, L. and Regan, L. (2000) Stopping Traffic: Exploring the Extent of, and Responses to, Trafficking in Women for Sexual Exploitation in the UK, London: Home Office, Police Research Series, Paper 125.Google Scholar
  17. Kennedy, H. (1992) Eve Was Framed: Women and British Justice, London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  18. Lees, S. (1997) Ruling Passions: Sexual Violence, Reputation and the Law, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pearson, E. (2002) Human Traffic: Human Rights, London: Anti-Slavery International.Google Scholar
  20. Shapland, J., Willmore, J. and Duff, P. (1985) Victims in the Criminal Justice System, Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  21. Sjolinder, N.H. (2002) ‘Trafficking in Human Beings – European Response’. European Conference on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings: global challenge for the 21st century Brussels, European Parliament, 18–20 September.Google Scholar
  22. Wemmers, J.A. (1996) Victims in the Criminal Justice System: A Study into the Treatment of Victims and its Effects in their Attitudes and Behaviour, Amsterdam: Kugler.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Feminist Review Ltd 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo Goodey

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations