Advertisement

French Politics

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 293–314 | Cite as

Collective Action and Civil Disobedience: The Anti-GMO Campaign of the Faucheurs Volontaires

  • Graeme Hayes
Research Article

Abstract

Civil disobedience has hitherto enjoyed only a relatively marginal place in the repertoires of French social movements, but has recently emerged as a key rallying frame for social mobilization, especially among environmental and counter-globalization movements. This paper examines the theory and practice of civil disobedience in the French context through an analysis of one such movement, the anti-GM Faucheurs Volontaires. Discussing the highly controversial campaign's positioning as ‘civic disobedience’, the article examines contested discourses of violence surrounding crop destruction, and the state responses to action, before asking what the campaign's claims to Republican civism mean for traditional notions of the relationship between state and challenging groups in France. It argues that framing action as civil disobedience is central to attempts to construct political and popular legitimacy, in terms of the campaign's national, international, and sectoral goals.

Keywords

civil disobedience genetic modification peasant activism violence global justice 

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1973) Crises of the Republic, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Balibar, E (1997) ‘Etat d'urgence démocratique’, Le Monde 19 February.Google Scholar
  3. Bavay, F., Contassot, Y., De Wreden, R., Dufour, F., Glasson, F., Matet, P., Rimbert, A. and Timoner, X. (2006) ‘Les OGM sont inconstitutionnels’, Le Monde 19 January.Google Scholar
  4. Beauval, V. (2005) ‘Un moratoire justifié’, Projet 288: 20–28.Google Scholar
  5. Bedau, H.A. (1961) ‘On civil disobedience’, The Journal of Philosophy 58(21): 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1988) ‘La Sociologie Dérange. Entretien avec Roger Chartier’, Les Chemins de la Connaissance, Première Partie, Transcript available at http://www.sociotoile.net/article23.html, accessed 18 January 2007.
  7. Bové, J. (2001) ‘A farmers' international?’ New Left Review 12: 89–101.Google Scholar
  8. Bové, J. and Luneau, G. (2004) Pour la Désobéissance Civique, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  9. Capdevielle, J. (2001) Modernité du Corporatisme, Paris: Presses de la FNSP.Google Scholar
  10. CGP/Commissariat Général du Plan (2001) OGM et Agriculture: Options pour l'Action Publique, Paris: La Documentation Française.Google Scholar
  11. Della Porta, D. and Diani, M (2006) Social Movements: An Introduction, (2nd edn.), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Della Porta, D. and Tarrow, S. (2005) ‘Transnational Processes and Social Activism: An Introduction’, in D. Della Porta and S. Tarrow (eds.) Transnational Protest and Global Activism, London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  13. Denis, S. (2005) ‘Du Plateau à Millau. Le Souvenir du Larzac’, in G. Hayes and M. O'Shaughnessy (eds.) Cinéma et engagement, Paris: L'Harmattan, pp. 99–123.Google Scholar
  14. Doherty, B. and Hayes, G. (2007) ‘A Tale of Two Movements. Manifestations anti-OGM en Grande-Bretagne et en France’, in D. Hiez and B. Villalba (eds.) La Désobéissance civile. Approches interdisciplinaires, Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  15. Ezekiel, J. (2006) ‘French dressing: race, gender, and the hijab story’, Feminist Studies 32(2): 256–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flam, H. (1994) ‘A Theoretical Framework for the Study of Encounters between States and Anti-Nuclear Movements’, in H. Flam (ed.) States and Anti-Nuclear Movements, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 9–26.Google Scholar
  17. Hayes, G. (2002) Environmental Protest and the State in France, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayes, G. (2006) ‘Vulnerability and disobedience: new action repertoires and environmental protest in France’, Environmental Politics 15(5): 821–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heller, C. (2002) ‘From scientific risk to paysan savoir-faire: peasant expertise in the French and global debate over GM crops’, Science as Culture 11(1): 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holohan, W. (1976) ‘Le conflit du Larzac: chronique et essai d′analyse’, Sociologie du Travail 18(3): 283–301.Google Scholar
  21. Jameson, F. (1998) ‘Notes on Globalization as a Philosophical Issue’, in F. Jameson and M. Miyoshi (eds.) The Cultures of Globalization, Durham and London: Duke University Press, pp. 54–77.Google Scholar
  22. Lang, B. (1970) ‘Civil disobedience and nonviolence: a distinction with a difference’, Ethics 80(2): 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lebovics, H. (2004) Bringing the Empire Back Home: France in the Global Age, Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leruth, M.F. (1998) ‘The neorepublican discourse on French national identity’, French Politics & Society 16(4): 46–61.Google Scholar
  25. Martin, J.-P. (2000) ‘La Confédération Paysanne et José Bové, des Actions Médiatiques au Service d'un Projet?’ Ruralia 6, http://ruralia.revues.org/document142.html, posted online 22 January 2005.
  26. McCauley, D. (2007) ‘Bringing France to Disorder: The Europeanisation of GM Foods Policy 1998–2006’, Paper presented to Third network meeting, CONNEX Research Group 4, Mannheim, Germany, 26–29 March.Google Scholar
  27. Pech, B. (1969) ‘Radical Disobedience and its Justification’, in H.A. Bedau (ed.) Civil Disobedience: Theory and Practice, Indianapolis: Pegasus, pp. 263–268.Google Scholar
  28. Pedretti, M. (2001) La Figure du Désobéissant en Politique. Étude de Pratiques de Désobéissance Civile en Démocratie, Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
  29. Plows, A., Wall, D. and Doherty, B. (2004) ‘Covert repertoires: ecotage in the UK’, Social Movement Studies 3(2): 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rawls, J. (1969) ‘The Justification of Civil Disobedience’, in H.A. Bedau (ed.) Civil Disobedience: Theory and Practice, Indianapolis: Pegasus, pp. 240–255.Google Scholar
  31. Rochon, T.R. (1988) Mobilizing for Peace. The Antinuclear Movements in Western Europe, London: Adamantine Press.Google Scholar
  32. Roy, A. and Joly, P.-B. (2000) ‘France: broadening precautionary expertise?’ Journal of Risk Research 3(3): 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Snow, D.A. and Benford, R.D. (1999) ‘Alternative Types of Cross-National Diffusion in the Social Movement Arena’, in D. della Porta, H. Kriesi and D. Rucht (eds.) Social Movements in a Globalizing World, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Snow, D.A., Rochford Jr, E.B., Worden, S.K. and Benford, R.D. (1986) ‘Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation’, American Sociological Review 51: 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tilly, C. (2003) The Politics of Collective Violence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vanderheiden, S. (2005) ‘Eco-terrorism or justified resistance? Radical environmentalism and the “War on Terror”’, Politics & Society 33(3): 425–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Welchman, J. (2001) ‘Is ecosabotage civil disobedience?’ Philosophy & Geography 4(1): 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Whiteside, K. (2003) ‘Humanisme et terroir: The culture of genetically modified crops in France’, French Politics, Culture & Society 21(3): 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graeme Hayes
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Languages & Social Sciences, Aston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations