European Political Science

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 305–315

governance network theory: towards a second generation

  • Jacob Torfing
Research

Abstract

Governance networks have gained increasing prominence in the wake of the many reports of government and market failure. Drawing on the burgeoning literature, we first define governance networks and then briefly assess their merits and problems. The key claim is that we are now seeing the development of a second generation of governance network research that focuses on new and yet unanswered questions about the prospects of network-based coordination across different levels of governance: the meta-governance of self-regulating networks; the role of discourse in relation to governance networks, and the democratic problems and potentials of network governance. In answering these important questions we can draw on different theoretical approaches to network governance, and these are briefly delineated.

Keywords

governance networks meta-governance democracy 

References

  1. Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Dean, M. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Foucault, M. (1991) ‘Governmentality’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect, Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
  4. Jessop, B. (1998) ‘The rise of governance and the risk of failure: the case of economic development’, International Social Science Journal 5(155): 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jessop, B. (1999) ‘Governance failure' unpublished paper, Department of Social Sciences’, Roskilde University.Google Scholar
  6. Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kersbergen, K. van and Waarden, F. van (2004) ‘“Governance” as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability accountability and legitimacy’, European Journal of Political Research 43, 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kickert, W.J.M., Klijn, E.H. and Koppenjan, J.F.M. (1997) Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Klijn, E.H. and Koppenjan, J.F.M. (2000) ‘Interactive Decision Making and Representative Democracy: Institutional Collisions and Solutions’, in O.V. Heffen, W.J.M. Kickert and J.A. Thomassen (eds.) Governance in Modern Society. Effects, Change and Formation of Government Institutions, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 109–134.Google Scholar
  10. Klijn, E.H. and Koppenjan, J.F.M. (2004) Managing Uncertainties in Networks, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Kohler-Koch, B. and Eising, R. (1999) The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koppenjan, J. and Klijn, E.H. (2004) Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem-solving and Decision-making, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Kooiman, J. (1993) Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Kooiman, J. (2000) ‘Societal Governance: Levels, Models and Orders of Social-Political Interaction’, in J. Pierre (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority Steering and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 138–164.Google Scholar
  15. March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1995) Democratic Governance, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Marin, B. and Mayntz, R. (1991) Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations, Frankfurt-am-Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Marsh, D. (1998) ‘The Utility and Future of Policy Network Analysis’, in D. Marsh (ed.) Comparing Policy Networks, Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 185–198.Google Scholar
  18. Mayntz, R. (1991) ‘Modernization and the logic of interorganizational networks’, Discussion Paper 91/8, Cologne: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  19. Mayntz, R. (1999) New Challenges to Governance Theory, Cologne: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  20. Milward, H.B. and Provan, K. (2000) ‘How Networks are Governed’, in C.J. Heinrich and L.E. Lynn (eds.) Governance and Performance: New Perspectives, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 238–262.Google Scholar
  21. Nielsen, K. and Pedersen, O.K. (1988) ‘The negotiated economy: ideal and history’, Scandinavian Political Studies 11(2): 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pierre, J. (2000) Debating Governance. Authority Steering, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pierre, J. and Peters, G. (2000) Governance Politics and the State, New York: St. Martins Press.Google Scholar
  24. Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, J. (1983) ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review 4(2): 147–160.Google Scholar
  25. Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, J. (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996) ‘The new governance: governing without government’, Political Studies Association 44(4): 652–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997a) Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997b) ‘Foreword’, in W.J.M. Kickert, E.H Klijn and J.F.M. Koppenjan (eds.) Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector, London: Sage, pp. xi–xv.Google Scholar
  29. Rose, N. (1996) ‘Governing ‘Advanced’ Liberal Democracies’, in A. Barry, T. Osborne and N. Rose (eds.) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 37–64.Google Scholar
  30. Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rose, N. and Miller, P. (1992) ‘Political power beyond the state: problematics of government’, British Journal of Sociology 43(2): 172–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scharpf, F.W. (1993) Games in Hierarchies and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions, Frankfurt-am-Main: Campus-Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Scharpf, F.W. (1994) ‘Games real actors could play: positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 6(1): 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scharpf, F.W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play: Actor Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Oxford: West View Point.Google Scholar
  35. Scharpf, F.W. (1999) Governing in Europe – Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scott, R.W. (1995) Institutions and Organizations, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2003) ‘Network politics, political capital, and democracy’, International Journal of Public Administration 2(6): 609–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. World Bank (1992) Governance and Development, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob Torfing
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations