European Journal of Information Systems

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 584–598 | Cite as

Implementing packaged enterprise software in multi-site firms: intensification of organizing and learning

  • Paul C van Fenema
  • Otto R Koppius
  • Peter J van Baalen
Special Section Article

Abstract

Packaged enterprise software, in contrast with custom-built software, is a ready-made mass product aimed at generic customer groups in a variety of industries and geographical areas. The implementation of packaged software usually leads to a phase of appropriation and customization. As the associated processes remain ill understood, particularly for multi-site implementations, the objective of this paper is to understand the impact of packaged software in a multi-site organization. Adopting a case study method, this paper reports on a multi-site project that was analyzed at the group, site, and corporate level. Our findings suggest that as organizational units face the unsettling experience of having to implement a single source code across globally distributed sites, packaged software intensifies organizing and learning processes across these levels. The paper identifies specific processes for these levels and concludes with implications for research and practice. Our research extends IS research on packaged software implementation with an emphasis on multi-site firms.

Keywords

packaged software organizing learning multi-site firms global projects 

References

  1. Adler P S and Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracies: enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiman-Smith L and Green S G (2002) Implementing new manufacturing technology: the related effects of technology characteristics and user learning activities. Academy of Management Journal 45 (2), 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyres N S (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: evidence from the B-2 “stealth” bomber. Organization Science 10 (2), 162–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barley S R (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31, 78–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bijker W E, Pinch TJ and Hughes TP (Eds) (1994) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Boudreau M-C and Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective. Organization Science 16 (1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cadili S and Whitley E A (2005) On the interpretative flexibility of hosted ERP systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14 (2), 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carmel E and Sawyer S (1998) Packaged software development teams: what makes them different? Information Technology & People 11 (1), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmel E and Tjia P (2005) Offshoring Information Technology Sourcing and Outsourcing to a Global Workforce. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chae B and Poole M S (2005) The surface of emergence in systems development: agency, institutions, and large-scale information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 14 (1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corley K G and Gioia D A (2004) Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly 49 (3), 174–208.Google Scholar
  12. Cramton C D (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science 12 (3), 346–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davenport T H (1998) Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review 76, 121–131.Google Scholar
  14. Dean J W, Yoon S J and Susman G I (1992) Advanced manufacturing technology and organization structure – empowerment or subordination. Organization Science 3 (2), 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eisenhardt K M (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14 (4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  16. Esteves-Sousa J and Pastor-Collado J (2001) Enterprise resources planning systems research: an annotated bibliography. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 7 (8), 1–51.Google Scholar
  17. Fleck J (1994) Learning by trying – the implementation of configurational technology. Research Policy 23 (6), 637–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gattiker T F and Goodhue D L (2004) Understanding the local-level costs and benefits of ERP through organizational. Information Processing Theory. Information & Management 41 (4), 431–443.Google Scholar
  19. Gattiker T F and Goodhue D L (2005) What happens after ERP implementation: understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quarterly 29 (3), 559–585.Google Scholar
  20. Giddens A (1986) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Hanseth O and Braa K (2001) Who's in Control: Designers, Managers – or Technology? Infrastructures and Norsk Hydro. In From Control to Drift. The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructure (CIBORRA CU, BRAA K, CORDELLA A, DAHLBOM B, FAILLA A, HANSETH O, HEPSO V, LJUNGBERG J, MONTEIRO E and SIMON KA, Eds), pp. 125–147, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Hitt L M, Wu D J and Zhou X (2002) Investment in enterprise resource planning: business impact and productivity measures. Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (1), 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Howcroft D and Light B (2006) Reflections on issues of power in packaged software selection. Information Systems Journal 16 (3), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King W R and Sethi V (2001) Patterns in the organization of transnational information systems. Information & Management 38 (4), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirsch L J and Haney M H (2006) Requirements determination for common systems: turning a global vision into a local reality. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 15 (2), 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klein H K and Myers M D (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23 (1), 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klein K J and Sorra J S (1996) The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review 21 (4), 1055–1080.Google Scholar
  28. Kogut B and Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science 7 (5), 502–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kotlarsky J and Oshri I (2005) Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Information Systems 14, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lai V S (2001) Issues of international information systems management: a perspective of affiliates. Information & Management 38 (4), 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levina N and Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly 29 (2), 335–363.Google Scholar
  32. Levina N and Vaast E (2006) Turning a community into a market: a practice perspective on information technology use in boundary spanning. Journal of Management Information Systems 22 (4), 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Light B and Wagner E (2006) Integration in ERP environments: rhetoric, realities and organisational possibilities. New Technology, Work and Employment 21 (3), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lucas H C, Walton E J and Ginzberg M J (1988) Implementing packaged software. MIS Quarterly 12 (4), 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Majchrzak A, Rice R E, King N, Malhotra A and Ba S (2000) Technology adaptation: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly 24 (4), 569–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malhotra A, Majchrzak A, Carman R and Lott V (2001) Radical innovation without collocation: a case study at boeing-rocketdyne. MIS Quarterly 25 (2), 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Markus M L, Tanis C and Van Fenema P C (2000) Enterprise resource planning: multisite ERP implementations. Communications of the ACM 43 (4), 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meadows C J (1996) Globalizing software development. Journal of Global Information Management 4 (1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miles M B and Huberman A M (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  40. Monteiro E (2001) Actor-network theory and information infrastructure. In From Control to Drift. The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructure (CIBORRA CU, BRAA K, CORDELLA A, DAHLBOM B, FAILLA A, HANSETH O, HEPSO V, LJUNGBERG J, MONTEIRO E and SIMON KA, Eds), pp. 71–83, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  41. Motwani J and Mirchandani D (2002) Successful implementation of ERP projects: evidence from two case studies. International Journal of Production Economics 75, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Motwani J, Mirchandani D, Madan M and Gunasekaran A (2002) Successful implementation of ERP projects: evidence from two case studies. International Journal of Production Economics 75 (1–2), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nandhakumar J, Rossi M and Talvinen J (2005) The dynamics of contextual forces of ERP implementation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14 (2), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nemiro J E (2000) The Glue That Binds Creative Virtual Teams. In Knowledge Management and Virtual Organizations (MALHOTRA Y, Ed), pp. 101–123, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Orlikowski W J (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3 (3), 398–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Orlikowski W J (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practical lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11 (4), 404–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pozzebon M and Pinsonneault A (2005) Global–local negotiations for implementing configurable packages: the power of initial organizational decisions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14 (2), 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rai A, Patnayakuni R and Seth N (2006) Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly 30 (2), 225–246.Google Scholar
  49. Robey D, Ross J W and Boudreau M-C (2002) Learning to implement enterprise systems: an exploratory study of the dialectics of change. Journal of MIS 19 (1), 17–46.Google Scholar
  50. Sawyer R K (2000) The etiquette of improvisation. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7 (3), 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scott J and Vessey I (2003) Implementing enterprise resource planning systems: the role of learning from failure. In Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementing for Effectiveness (SHANKS G, SEDDON PB and WILLCOCKS LP, Eds), pp. 241–274, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scott S V and Wagner E L (2003) Networks, negotiations and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration. Information & Organization 13 (4), 285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Soh C and Kien S S (2005) The challenges of implementing “Vanilla” versions of enterprise systems. MIS Quarterly Executive 4 (3), 373–384.Google Scholar
  54. Soh C, Kien S S, Boh W F and Tang M (2003) Cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 16 (1), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Soh C, Kien S S and Tay-Yap J (2000) Cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? Communications of the ACM 43 (4), 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Soh C and Sia S K (2004) An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package–organization misalignments. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13, 375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Teece D J, Pisano G and Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tippins M J and Sohi R S (2003) IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal 24, 745–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Maanen J (1979) The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 539–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vaughan D (1997) The trickle-down effect: policy decisions, risky work, and the challenger tragedy. California Management Review 39 (2), 80–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Volkoff O, Strong D M and Elmes M B (2005) Understanding enterprise systems-enabled integration. European Journal of Information Systems 14 (2), 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Von Hippel E (1994) “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation. Management Science 40 (4), 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wagner E L, Scott S V and Galliers R D (2006) The creation of ‘Best Practice’ software: myth, reality and ethics. Information & Organization 16, 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Walsham G (1995a) The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research 6 (4), 376–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walsham G (1995b) Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4 (2), 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wang E T G, Klein G and Jiang J J (2006) ERP misfit: country of origin and organizational factors. Journal of Management Information Systems 23 (1), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yin R K (2002) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul C van Fenema
    • 1
  • Otto R Koppius
    • 2
  • Peter J van Baalen
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Military Sciences, Netherlands Defence Academy (NLDA)BredaThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Decision and Information SciencesRSM Erasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Decision and Information SciencesRSM Erasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations