Skip to main content
Log in

Innovation diffusion in global contexts: determinants of post-adoption digital transformation of European companies

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Grounded in the diffusion of innovation theory and the technology–organization–environment framework, we develop an integrative model to study the determinants of post-adoption stages of innovation diffusion, using enterprise digital transformation as an example of technology-enabled innovations. We specify four innovation characteristics (relative advantage, compatibility, costs and security concern) and four contextual factors (technology competence, organization size, competitive pressure and partner readiness) as determinants of post-adoption usage, and postulate usage as an intermediate link to impact on firm performance. We test the proposed model using a dataset of 1415 companies from six European countries. We find that the innovation needs to be used extensively in value-chain activities before its impact can be realized. Among the innovation characteristics, we find that compatibility is the strongest driver, and security concern outweighs cost as a usage inhibitor. Among the contextual variables, technology competence, partner readiness and competitive pressure significantly drive e-business usage, and the structural inertia of large firms tends to slow down its penetration. Collectively, these results indicate that innovation diffusion can be better understood by including both innovation characteristics and contextual factors, whereas earlier literature has traditionally treated the two separately. Finally, we evaluate an international dimension among European countries and tease out important boundary conditions that would not have been evident in a single-country dataset. Our results show that careful attention must be paid to the economic and regulatory factors that may result in uneven innovation diffusion even among developed European countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barua A, Konana P, Whinston AB and Yin F (2004) An empirical investigation of Net-enabled business value: an exploratory investigation. MIS Quarterly 28 (4), 585–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty RC, Shim JP and Jones MC (2001) Factors influencing corporate Web site adoption: a time-based assessment. Information & Management 38 (6), 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr NG (2003) IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review 81 (5), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caselli F and Coleman WJ (2001) Cross-country technology diffusion: the case of computers. The American Economic Review 91 (2), 328–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee D, Grewal R and Sambamurthy V (2002) Shaping up for e-commerce: institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of Web technologies. MIS Quarterly 26 (2), 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau PYK and Tam KY (1997) Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: an exploratory study. MIS Quarterly 21 (1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research (MARCOULIDES GA, Ed), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chircu AM and Kauffman RJ (2000) Limits to value in electronic commerce-related IT investments. Journal of Management Information Systems 17 (2), 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RB and Zmud RW (1990) Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Management Science 36 (2), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie WL (2004) Value Creation from E-Business Models. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour F (1992) Organizational size and innovation. Organization Studies 13 (3), 275–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Agarwal D, Ioannidis A and Gopalakrishnan S (1999) Determinants of information technology adoption: an extension of existing models to firms in a developing country. Journal of Global Information Management 7 (3), 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj S and Kohli R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Management Science 49 (3), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004) The European E-Business Report—2004 Edition. Enterprise Publications, Brussels, Belgium.

  • European Commission (2005) The European E-Business Report—2005 Edition. Enterprise Publications, Brussels, Belgium.

  • Fichman RG (2000) The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations. In Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future through the Past (ZMUD R, Ed), Pinnaflex Publishing, Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher K and Wright G (1997) Strategic and organizational determinants of information system sophistication: an analysis of the uptake of database marketing in the financial services industry. European Journal of Information Systems 6 (3), 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C and Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garicano L and Kaplan N (2001) The effects of business-to-business e-commerce on transaction costs. Journal of Industrial Economics 49 (4), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon H and Robertson TS (1989) Technology diffusion: an empirical test of competitive effects. Journal of Marketing 53 (1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrion AM and Krishnan R (2003) E-business and management science: mutual impacts (Part 1 of 2). Management Science 49 (10), 1275–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacovou CL, Benbasat I and Dexter AS (1995) Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly 19 (4), 465–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones S, Wilikens M, Morris P and Masera M (2000) Trust requirements in e-business. Communications of the ACM 43 (12), 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil M, Tan BCY, Wei KK, Saarinen T, Tuunainen V and Wassenaar A (2000) A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly 24 (2), 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer KL, Dedrick J, Melville N and Zhu K (2006) Global E-Commerce: Impacts of National Environments and Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon T and Zmud RW (1987) Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. In Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (BOLAND RJ and HIRSHCHEIM RA, Eds), pp 227–251, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra NK, Kim S and Agarwal J (2004) Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): the construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research 15 (4), 336–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata F, Fuerst W and Barney JB (1995) Information technology and sustained firm-level value: a resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly 19 (4), 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville N, Kraemer KL and Gurbaxani V (2004) Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly 28 (2), 283–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GC and Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2 (3), 192–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay T, Kekre S and Kalathur S (1995) Business value of information technology: a study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quarterly 19 (2), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nord W and Tucker S (1987) Implementing Routine and Radical Innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) available online at http://cs4hq.oecd.org/oecd/eng/TableViewer/Wdsview/dispviewp.asp?ReportId=1749&bReportOnly=True,last accessed June 6 2006.

  • Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie S, Lee JY and Podskoff N (2003) Common method biases in behavior research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohjola M (2001) Information technology and economic growth: a cross-country analysis. In Information Technology and Economic Development (POHJOLA M, Ed), pp 242–256, Oxford University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (2001) Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review 79 (3), 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M and Millar V (1985) How information gives you firm-level value. Harvard Business Review 63 (4), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar G, Ramamurthy K and Crum MR (1997) Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportation industry. European Journal of Information Systems 6 (2), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar G, Ramamurthy K and Nilakanta S (1994) Implementation of electronic data interchange: an innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 11 (2), 157–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations (4th edn) Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig PM (1994) When can management science research be generalized internationally? Management Science 40 (1), 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro C and Varian H (1999) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih C, Kraemer K and Dedrick J (2007) Determinants of country level investment in information technology. Management Science, Forthcoming.

  • Soh C and Markus ML (1995) How IT creates business value: a process theory synthesis. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems (DEGROSS JI, ARIAV G, BEATH C, HOYER R and KEMERER C, Eds), pp 29–41, ACM Publications, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart KA and Segars AH (2002) An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Information Systems Research 13 (1), 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub D and Watson R (2001) Transformational issues in researching IS and net-enabled organizations. Information Systems Research 12 (4), 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson EB (1994) Information systems innovation among organizations. Management Science 40 (9), 1069–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo HH, Wei KK and Benbasat I (2003) Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly 27 (1), 19–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thong JYL (1999) An integrated model of information systems adoption in small business. Journal of Management Information Systems 15 (4), 187–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky LG and Fleischer M (1990) The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky LG and Klein K (1982) Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM- EM-29 (1), 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worldbank (2001) available online at http://www.worldbank.org/data/countrydata/ictglance.htm,last accessed on June 6 2006.

  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL and Xu S (2003) Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. European Journal of Information Systems 12 (4), 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL, Xu S and Dedrick J (2004) Information technology payoff in e-business environments: An international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. Journal of Management Information Systems 21 (1), 17–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K and Kraemer KL (2005) Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research 16 (1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL and Xu S (2006a) The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science 52 (10), 1557–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Xu S, Kraemer KL, Korte W and Selhofer H (2006b) Contingency effects in innovation diffusion: why does the same technology attract firms differently?, Working paper, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments of reviewers and editors of the journal, whose suggestions greatly improved the structure and clarity of the article. Data were provided by Empirica, GmbH, Bonn, Germany. This research has been supported by grants from the U.S. National Science Foundation and by the European Commission. Kevin Zhu acknowledges the support of CAREER award from the U.S. National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the European Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Zhu.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1

Table a1 Measurement items

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, K., Dong, S., Xu, S. et al. Innovation diffusion in global contexts: determinants of post-adoption digital transformation of European companies. Eur J Inf Syst 15, 601–616 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000650

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000650

Keywords

Navigation