European Journal of Information Systems

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 460–466 | Cite as

Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability

Opinion and Ideas

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is based on an address given to the Sixth European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Capabilities, Cambridge, MA, in March 2005. I would like to thank Sue Newell for her invitation to develop these ideas. I am also grateful to my collaborators at MIT – JoAnne Yates, Stephanie Woerner, and Kate Kellogg – for their contributions to this work. The research discussed here was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation under award #IIS-0085725.

References

  1. Bechky BA (2003a) Object lessons: workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. American Journal of Sociology 109 (3), 720–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechky BA (2003b) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science 14 (3), 312–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg M (1997) Of forms, containers, and the electronic medical record: some tools for a sociology of the formal. Science, Technology, & Human Values 22 (4), 403–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruner J (1990) Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  5. Blackler F (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation. Organization Studies 16 (6), 1021–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Button G (1993) The curious case of the vanishing technology. In Technology in Working Order: Studies in Work, Interaction, and Technology (BUTTON G, Ed), pp 10–28, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  7. Callon M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of saint Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (LAW J, Ed.), pp 196–233, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science 13 (4), 442–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science 15 (5), 555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark A (1997) Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Clark A (1998) Magic words: how language augments human computation. In Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes (CARRUTHERS P and BOUCHER J, Eds), pp 162–183, Cambrige University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark A (2002) Towards a science of the bio-technological mind. International Journal of Cognition and Technology 1 (1), 212–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engeström Y, Miettinen R and Punamäki R-L (Eds) (1999) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haraway D (1992) The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In Cultural Studies (GROSSBERG L, NELSON C and TREICHLER PA, Eds.), pp 295–337, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Kellogg K, Orlikowski WJ and Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: structuring coordination across boundaries in post-bureaucratic organizations. Organization Science 17 (1), 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Latour B (1992) Where are the missing masses? sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (BIJKER W and LAW J, Eds), pp 225–258, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Latour B (2004) Nonhumans. In Patterned Ground: Entanglements of Nature and Culture (HARRISON S, PILE S, and THRIFT N, Eds), pp 224–227, London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  18. Lave J (1988) Cognition in Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Law J (1992) Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice 5 (4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicolini D, Gherardi S and Yanow D (Eds.), (2003) Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. M.E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
  21. Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11 (4), 404–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science 13 (3), 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orlikowski WJ and Barley SR (2001) Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other. MIS Quarterly 25 (2), 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pickering A (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sassen S (2002) Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology 50 (3), 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Star SL and Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations, and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19, 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tsoukas H (2005) Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  28. Turnbull D (2000) Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers: Comparative Studies in the Sociology of Scientific and Indigenous Knowledge. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vygotsky L (1962, trans.) Thought and Language. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Woerner S, Orlikowski WJ and Yates J (2005) Scaffolding conversations: combining media in organizational communication. Paper presented at the 21st European Group for Organisational Studies Conference, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  31. Woolgar S (2002) After word? – on some dynamics of duality interrogation or why bonfires are not enough. Theory, Culture, and Society 19 (5/6), 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MIT Sloan School of ManagementCambridgeU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations