European Journal of Information Systems

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 460–466

Material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability

Opinion and Ideas

References

  1. Bechky BA (2003a) Object lessons: workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. American Journal of Sociology 109 (3), 720–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechky BA (2003b) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science 14 (3), 312–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg M (1997) Of forms, containers, and the electronic medical record: some tools for a sociology of the formal. Science, Technology, & Human Values 22 (4), 403–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruner J (1990) Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  5. Blackler F (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation. Organization Studies 16 (6), 1021–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Button G (1993) The curious case of the vanishing technology. In Technology in Working Order: Studies in Work, Interaction, and Technology (BUTTON G, Ed), pp 10–28, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  7. Callon M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of saint Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (LAW J, Ed.), pp 196–233, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science 13 (4), 442–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science 15 (5), 555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark A (1997) Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Clark A (1998) Magic words: how language augments human computation. In Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes (CARRUTHERS P and BOUCHER J, Eds), pp 162–183, Cambrige University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark A (2002) Towards a science of the bio-technological mind. International Journal of Cognition and Technology 1 (1), 212–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engeström Y, Miettinen R and Punamäki R-L (Eds) (1999) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haraway D (1992) The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In Cultural Studies (GROSSBERG L, NELSON C and TREICHLER PA, Eds.), pp 295–337, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Kellogg K, Orlikowski WJ and Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: structuring coordination across boundaries in post-bureaucratic organizations. Organization Science 17 (1), 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Latour B (1992) Where are the missing masses? sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (BIJKER W and LAW J, Eds), pp 225–258, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Latour B (2004) Nonhumans. In Patterned Ground: Entanglements of Nature and Culture (HARRISON S, PILE S, and THRIFT N, Eds), pp 224–227, London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  18. Lave J (1988) Cognition in Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Law J (1992) Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice 5 (4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicolini D, Gherardi S and Yanow D (Eds.), (2003) Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. M.E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
  21. Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11 (4), 404–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science 13 (3), 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orlikowski WJ and Barley SR (2001) Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other. MIS Quarterly 25 (2), 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pickering A (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sassen S (2002) Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology 50 (3), 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Star SL and Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations, and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19, 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tsoukas H (2005) Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  28. Turnbull D (2000) Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers: Comparative Studies in the Sociology of Scientific and Indigenous Knowledge. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vygotsky L (1962, trans.) Thought and Language. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Woerner S, Orlikowski WJ and Yates J (2005) Scaffolding conversations: combining media in organizational communication. Paper presented at the 21st European Group for Organisational Studies Conference, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  31. Woolgar S (2002) After word? – on some dynamics of duality interrogation or why bonfires are not enough. Theory, Culture, and Society 19 (5/6), 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MIT Sloan School of ManagementCambridgeU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations