Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decision support systems evolution: framework, case study and research agenda

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Evolutionary development has been central to the theory and practice of decision support systems (DSS) since the inception of the field. Terms such as ‘adaptive’ and ‘evolutionary’ capture the organic nature of the development of a decision support system. However, the terms are rarely defined and their meaning varies widely in the research literature. The aim of this paper is to contribute to decision support systems theory by investigating and clearly specifying the nature of the evolutionary process of a DSS. Using insights from other disciplines and prior DSS research, a framework for understanding DSS evolution is developed based on the aetiology, lineage, and tempo of evolution. The descriptive validity of the framework is demonstrated by applying it to published DSS studies and to an intensive case study of DSS development. The framework and the case study findings are used to define a research agenda that is important for evolutionary DSS development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam F and Murphy C (1995) Information flows amongst executives: their implications for systems development. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 4(4), 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi M (1984) An assessment of the prototyping approach to information systems development. Communications of the ACM 27(6), 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter SL (1980) Decision Support Systems: Current Practice and Continuing Challenges. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angehrn AA and Jelassi T (1994) DSS research and practice in perspective. Decision Support Systems 12, 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antes J, Campen L, Derigs U, Titze C and Wolle G-D (1998) SYNOPSE: a model-based decision support systems for the evaluation of flight schedules for cargo airlines. Decision Support Systems 22, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arinze OB (1991) A contingency model of DSS development methodology. Journal of Management Information Systems 8(1), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson P and Hammersley M (1994) Ethnography and participant observation. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (DENZIN NK and LINCOLN YS, Eds), pp 248–261, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison DE and Fitzgerald G (1995) Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools (2nd edn). McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville R and Wood-Harper AT (1998) Diversity in information systems action research methods. European Journal of Information Systems 7, 90–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat I, Goldstein DK and Mead M (1987) The case research strategy in studies of information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly 11(3), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies P, Carne C, Mackay H and Tudhope D (1999) Rapid application development (RAD): an empirical view. European Journal of Information Systems 8, 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botha S, Gryffenberg I, Hofmeyer FR, Lausberg JL, Nicolay RP, Smit WJ, Uys S, Van der merwe WL and Wessels GJ (1997) Guns or butter: decision support for determining the size and shape of the South African National Defense Force. Interfaces 27(1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavaye ALM (1996) Case study research: a multi-faceted research approach for IS. Information Systems Journal 6, 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole RE (1991) Participant observer research: an activist role. In Participatory Action Research (WHYTE WF, Ed.), pp 159–166, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Courbon J-C (1996) User-centered DSS design and implementation. In Implementing Systems for Supporting Management Decisions: Concepts, Methods and Experiences (HUMPHREYS P, BANNON L, McCOSH A, MLGLIARESE P and POMEROL J-C, Eds), pp 108–122, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Courbon J-C, Grajew J and Tolovi J (1978) Design and implementation of Interactive decision support systems: an evolutive approach, Technical Report, Institute d'Administration des Enterprises, Grenoble, France.

  • Darwin CR (1996 first published 1859) The Origin of Species. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1996) Climbing Mount Improbable. Viking, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers RD (1992) Choosing information systems research approaches. In Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines (GALLIERS RD, Ed.), pp 144–162, Blackwell Scientific, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Belknap/Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ and Eldredge N (1977) Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3, 115–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter A and Frolick M (1991) The evolution of EIS at Georgia Power Company. Information Executive 4(4), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst Jr EG, Ness DN, Gambino TJ and Johnson TH (1983) Growing DSS: a flexible, evolutionary approach. In Building Decision Support Systems (BENNETT JL, Ed.), pp 111–132, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igbaria M, Sprague Jr RH, Basnet C and Foulds L (1996) The impacts and benefits of a DSS: the case of FleetManager. Information and Management 31, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janson MA and Smith LD (1985) Prototyping for systems development: a critical appraisal. Management Information Systems Quarterly 9, 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jirachiefpattana W, Arnott DR and O'Donnell PA (1996) Executive information systems development in Thailand. In Implementing Systems for Supporting Management Decisions: Concepts, Methods and Experiences (HUMPHREYS P, BANNON L, McCOSH A, MILGLIARESE P and POMEROL J-C, Eds), pp 203–224, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keen PGW (1980) Adaptive design for decision support systems. Data Base 12(1/2), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen PGW and Gambino TJ (1983) Building a decision support system: The mythical man-month revisited. In Building Decision Support Systems (BENNETT JL, Ed.), pp 133–172, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis H (1962) Catastrophic selection as a factor in speciation. Evolution 16, 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meador CL and Ness DN (1974) Decision support systems: an application to corporate planning. Sloan Management Review 15(2), 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandhakumar J (1996) Design for success?: critical success factors in executive information systems development. European Journal of Information Systems 5, 62–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness DN (1975) Interactive systems: theories of design. In Proceedings of the Joint Wharton/ONR Conference on Interactive Information and DSS. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehaus RJ (1995) The evolution of strategy and structure of a human resource planning DSS application. Decision Support Systems 14, 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell PA, Arnott DR and Gibson M (2002) Data warehouse development methodologies: a comparative analysis. In Decision Making and Decision Support in the Internet Age (ADAM F, BREZILLON P, HUMPHREYS P and POMEROL J-C, Eds), pp 387–398, Oak Tree Press, Cork, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson JM and Shim JP (1994) An empirical investigation into decision support systems capabilities: a proposed taxonomy. Information and Management 27, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price PW (1996) Biological Evolution. Harcourt Brace, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby B, Lasdon LS and Waren AD (1995) The evolution of Texaco's blending systems: from OMEGA to StarBlend. Interfaces 25(5), 64–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sage AP (1991) Decision Support Systems Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer DR (1985) Developmental Psychology: Theory, Research and Applications. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakun MF (1991) Airline buyout: evolutionary systems design and problem restructuring in group decision and negotiation. Management Science 37(10), 1291–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim JP, Warkentin M, Courtney JF, Power DJ, Sharda R and Carlson C (2002) Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decision Support Systems 33, 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver MS (1991) Systems that Support Decision Makers: Description and Analysis. Wiley, Surrey, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson GG (1944) Tempo And Mode in Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague Jr RH and Carlson ED (1982) Building Effective Decision Support Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabell CR (1983) A decision oriented approach to building DSS. In Building Decision Support Systems (BENNETT JL, Ed.), pp 221–260, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake RE (1994) Case studies. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (DENZIN NK and LINCOLN YS, Eds), pp 236–247, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suvachittanont W, Arnott DR and O'Donnell PA (1994) Adaptive design in executive information systems development: A manufacturing case study. Journal of Decision Systems 3(4), 277–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valusek JS (1994) Adaptive design of DSS: a user perspective. In Decision Support and Executive Information Systems (GRAY P, Ed.), pp 78–86, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walstrom KA and Wilson RL (1997) An examination of executive information system (EIS) users. Information and Management 32(2), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson HJ, Rainer RK and Koh CE (1991) Executive information systems: a framework for development and a survey of current practices. Management Information Systems Quarterly March, 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wixom BH and Watson HJ (2001) An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehouse success. Management Information Systems Quarterly 25(1), 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd edn). Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young LF (1989) Decision Support and Idea Processing Systems. William Brown, Dubuque, IA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, Victoria, 3800, Australia

    David Arnott

Authors
  1. David Arnott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Arnott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arnott, D. Decision support systems evolution: framework, case study and research agenda. Eur J Inf Syst 13, 247–259 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000509

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000509

Keywords

Search

Navigation