Advertisement

Corporate Reputation Review

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 189–200 | Cite as

Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Corporate Reputation: The Context of Airline Companies

  • Mary E Graham
  • Pratima Bansal
Academic Research

Abstract

Prior studies of corporate reputation have looked broadly at the relationship between corporate reputation and corporate performance. In this paper, we take a more fine-grained approach. In particular, we investigate consumers' willingness to pay for organizational attributes that have historically predicted corporate reputation, in this case, for airlines. Using a policy-capturing or scenario-based design, we determine how airline customers choose between a series of ticket options. The findings provide two important insights into corporate reputation. First, they demonstrate that consumers are willing to pay more for a better corporate reputation. Secondly, they demonstrate that consumers base their willingness to pay on organizational attributes, but that they do so primarily through corporate reputation. These findings suggest that corporate reputation research has an important place within our understanding of corporate strategy.

Keywords

corporate reputation policy capturing willingness to pay 

References

  1. Antunovich, P., Laster, D. and Mitnick, S. (2000) ‘Are high-quality firms also high-quality investments?’, Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 6 (1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, M.L., Jermier, J.M. and Lafferty, B.A. (2006) ‘Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape’, Corporate Reputation Review, 9, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986) ‘The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum, J.A.C. and Oliver, C. (1991) ‘Institutional linkages and organizational mortality’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 187–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brammer, S. and Millington, A. (2005) ‘Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis’, Journal of Business Ethics, 61 (1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carmeli, A. and Tishler, A. (2005) ‘Perceived organizational reputation and organizational performance: An empirical investigation of industrial enterprises’, Corporate Reputation Review, 8 (1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cochran, W.G. and Cox, G.M. (1957) Experimental Designs, 2nd edn.,Wiley, New York, NJ.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G. and Aiken, L.S. (2002) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd edn.,Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  9. Dowling, G.R. (2001) Creating Corporate Reputations: Identity, Image and Performance, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M. and Harquail, C.V. (1994) ‘Organizational images and member identification’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elsbach, K.D. (1994) ‘Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39 (1), 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. FAA (1996) ‘FAA statement on ValuJet’, Press release by the Federal Aviation Administration, 17 June.Google Scholar
  13. Fombrun, C. and Shanley, M. (1990) ‘What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy’, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fombrun, C.J. (1996) Reputation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  15. Freeman, J., Carroll, G.R. and Hannan, M.T. (1983) ‘The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates’, American Sociological Review, 48, 692–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gatewood, R.D., Gowan, M.A. and Lautenschlager, D.J. (1993) ‘Corporate image, recruitment image, and initial job choice decisions’, Academy of Management Journal, 36, 414–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graham, M.E. and Cable, D.M. (2001) ‘Consideration of the incomplete block design for policy capturing research’, Organizational Research Methods, 4, 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greening, D.W. and Gray, B. (1994) ‘Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues’, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 467–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1984) ‘Structural inertia and organizational change’, American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoffman, P.J. (1960) ‘The paramorphic representation of clinical judgement’, Psychological Bulletin, 57, 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGuire, J.B., Schneeweis, T. and Branch, B. (1990) ‘Perceptions of firm quality: A cause or result of firm performance’, Journal of Management, 16, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1991) ‘Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony’, in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp.41–62.Google Scholar
  23. Pedhazur, E.J. (1982) Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Perrow, C. (1979) Complex Organizations, Scott, Freeman, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  25. Rao, H. (1994) ‘The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912’, Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Special Issue), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roberts, P.W. and Dowling, G.R. (2002) ‘Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 23 (12), 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rynes, S.L. (1991) ‘Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research directions’, in M. Dunnette and L. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organizational Psychology, Vol.2, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, pp.399–444.Google Scholar
  28. Schiavo, M.S. (1997) Flying Blind, Flying Safe, Avon Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  29. Scott, W.R. (1991) ‘Unpacking institutional arguments’, in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp.164–182.Google Scholar
  30. Singh, J.V., Tucker, D.J. and House, R.J. (1986) ‘Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965) ‘Social structure and organizations’, in J.G. March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL, pp. 142–193.Google Scholar
  32. Suchman, M.C. (1995) ‘Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches’, Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
  33. Wholey, D.R. and Brittain, J.W. (1986) ‘Organizational ecology: Findings and implications’, Academy of Management Review, 11, 513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zucker, L.G. (1988) ‘Where do institutional patterns come from? Organizations as actors in social systems’, in L.G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations, Culture and Environment, Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA,p.23–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary E Graham
    • 1
  • Pratima Bansal
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Business, Clarkson UniversityPotsdamUSA
  2. 2.Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations