Symbolic or Behavioral Management? Corporate Reputation in High-Emission Industries
- 120 Downloads
In this paper, we identify two important approaches to corporation reputation building: symbolic management and behavioral management. Within the first approach, corporate communications are intended to generate positive impressions among ‘media audiences’. Within the second approach, corporate actions are changed to more closely align with the message being conveyed by corporation communications. Many corporate managers assume that the symbolic alignment between what is wanted by media audiences and what is said enhances corporate reputation and this, in turn, improves corporate profitability. In this paper, we tested the relative efficacy of the symbolic and behavioral management approaches to corporate reputation and profitability. We found that symbolic management had a positive effect on symbolic reputation, whereas behavioral management had a positive effect on performance reputation. We also found that a positive reputation in the media did not contribute to corporate profitability, whereas a positive performance reputation had a significant effect on profitability. We conclude that the behavioral management approach is more effective for reputation building and for contributing to profitability. We also discuss implications of our findings for reputation management and corporate performance.
KeywordsSymbolic Management Behavioral Management Media Reputation Performance Reputation Profitability Environment
We would like to thank Pratima Bansal (University of Western Ontario) for her important assistance with measure construction and helpful comments on our conceptual development.
- Bentler, P.M. (2004)EQS 6 6 Structural Equation Program Manual, Multivariate, Software Inc., Encino, CA.Google Scholar
- Brady, A. (2005) ‘The sustainability effect: New business paradigm for the Middle East’, Arab British Business Bulletin, 28 (40), 24–25.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B.M. (1994) Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Window: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming';, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- Davis, G., Kincaid, L., Swanson, M., Schultz, T., Bartmess, J., Griffith, B. and Jones, S. (1994) Chemical Hazard Evaluation for Management Strategies: A Method for Ranking and Scoring Chemicals by Potential Human Health and Environmental Impact, Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/R-94/177, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Fombrun, C.J. (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image, Harvard Business School Press, Massachussets.Google Scholar
- Greenwald, A.G. (1993) ‘Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis’, in G. Keren & C. Lewis (eds.)A Handbook for Data Analysis in Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
- Grunig, J.E. (1992) ‘What is excellence in management?’, in J.E. Grunig (ed.)Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
- Grunig, J.E. (2003) ‘Constructing public relations theory and practice’, in B. Dervin and S.H. Chaffee (eds.)Communication, a Different Kind of Horserace, Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.Google Scholar
- Grunig, J.E. (2006) After 50 Years: The Value and Values of Public Relations, Speech Delivered to The Institute for Public Relations 45th Annual Distinguished Lecture, The Yale Club, New York, 9 November, 2006.Google Scholar
- Grunig, J.E. and Hunt, T. (1984) Managing Public Relations, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Grunig, L.A., Grunig, J.E. and Dozier, D.M. (2002) Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations: A Study of Communication Management in Three Countries, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
- Office of Pollution Prevention Toxics (1995) 1993 Toxics Release Inventory: Public Data Release', EPA 745-R-95-010Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J. (1981) ‘Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms’, in L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (eds.)Research in organization behavior, Vol. 3,JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.Google Scholar
- Post, J.E., Preston, L.E. and Sachs, S. (2002) Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- Salama, A.I. (2003) A Median Regression Analysis of the Relationship between Environmental Reputation and Corporate Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence on UK firms, A paper presented at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Conference, October, New York.Google Scholar
- Sobel, M.E. (1982) ‘Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models’, in S. Leinhart (ed)Sociological Methodology 1982, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
- TRI Program Division (2005) 2003 TRI Public Data Release eReport, US Environmental Protection Agency, Retrieved June 2, 2005, from http://www.epa.gov/tri/tridata/tri03/2003eReport.pdf.
- Wood, D.J. (1991) ‘Corporate social performance revisited’, Academy of Management Review, 16 (4), 691–718.Google Scholar