OR Insight

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 44–56

Understanding operational strategies by examining quality deposits

Original Article

Abstract

Most mature organisations regularly undertake varying forms of business improvement activities, from specific operationally focused project activities to organisation-wide change initiatives. While the success of business improvement approaches is often debated, such initiatives always leave some form of trace or legacy behind, often in the form of specific processes and procedures, individual or group behaviours, or even a different organisational culture. We refer to the residual traces of previous quality improvement initiatives as quality deposits, and suggest that where an organisation has gone through several change processes over an extended period, it would be useful to examine and recognise the cumulative effect of these quality deposits when considering future strategy development. This article expands on the existing, but limited, quality deposit theory by reviewing potential methodologies that may be adopted when considering quality deposits within any organisation. The article briefly reflects on quality deposits theory, and locates this concept within the current change management literature. The quality deposits approach is then used to analyse a case organisation, and discussion of the potential benefits of this approach is provided before highlighting aspects of potential future research. The article concludes that through examining past operational initiatives, important knowledge can be gained that will be of value in planning future business improvement activities.

Keywords

quality deposits operational change operational strategy 

References

  1. Bamford, D. (2006) A case study into change influences within a large British multinational. Journal of Change Management 6 (2): 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamford, D. and Forrester, P. (2003) Managing planned and emergent change within an operations management environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 23 (5): 546–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bamford, D. and Greatbanks, R. (2005) The use of quality management tools and techniques: A study of application in everyday situations. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 22 (4): 376–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breyfogle, F.W. (1999) Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions using Statistical Methods. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  5. British Quality Foundation (BQF). (2000) The model in practice: Using the EFQM excellence model to deliver continuous improvement, www.quality-foundation.co.uk, London.
  6. Bullock, R. and Batten, D. (1985) It's just a phase we’re going through: A review and synthesis of OD phase analysis. Group & Organisation Studies 10 (December): 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnes, B. (2009) Managing Change, 5th edn. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Cummings, T. and Huse, E. (1989) Organisation Development and Change. Minnesota: West, St Paul.Google Scholar
  9. Dale, B.G. (2007) Managing Quality, 5th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Dale, B.G., Williams, A.R.T., Van der Wiele, A. and Greatbanks, R.W. (2002) Organizational change through quality deposits. Quality Engineering 13 (3): 27–35.Google Scholar
  11. Dawson, P. (1994) Organisational Change: A Processual Approach. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. EFQM. (2004). www.efqm.org.
  13. Garvin, D.A. (1994) Building a learning organisation. Harvard Business Review, July/August: 78–91.Google Scholar
  14. Genus, A. (1998) The Management of Change: Perspectives and Practice. London: International Thompson.Google Scholar
  15. Hartley, J., Bennington, J. and Binns, P. (1997) Researching the roles of inter-change agents in the management of organisational change. British Journal of Management 8 (1): 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Imai, M. (1997) Gemba Kaizen: A Commonsense, Low-Cost Approach to Management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Kanter, R.M., Stein, B.A. and Jick, T.D. (1992) The Challenge of Organisational Change. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lewin, K. (1958) Group decisions and social change. In: G.E. Swanson, T.M. Newcomb and E.L. Nartley (eds.) Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  19. Pettigrew, A. and Whipp, R. (1993) Understanding the Environment. In: Mabey, C. & Mayon-White, B. (eds.) Managing Change. London: Open University/Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Remenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A. and Swartz, E. (2002) Doing Research in Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Schein, E.H. (1985) Organisational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. USA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Senior, P.M. (1997) Organisational Change. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  23. Van der Brent, J., Pauwe, J. and Williams, A.R.T. (1999) Organisational learning: An exploration of organisational memory and its role in organisational change. Journal of Organisational Change 12 (5): 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van der Wiele, A., Williams, A.R.T. and Dale, B.G. (2001) Quality management: Is it a fad, fashion or fit? Quality management Journal 7: 2.Google Scholar
  25. Watson, T. (1994) In Search of Management. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Wilson, D.C. (1992) A Strategy of Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Womack, J.P. and Jones, D.T. (2003) Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Yin, R.K. (2008) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods), 5th edn. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Business SchoolManchesterUK
  2. 2.Department of ManagementUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations