Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 723–748 | Cite as

An empirical analysis of US vessel-related port accidents (2002–2012): Impact of union membership and port efficiency on accident incidence and economic damage

  • Jomon Aliyas Paul
  • Leo MacDonald
Original Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

We examine the impact of several factors, including union membership and port efficiency, on the number of vessel related accidents and the resulting economic damage at major US ports during the time period 2002–2012. We show that, on average, the union membership rate and port efficiency have a positive and a statistically significant impact on the number of vessel-related port accidents. This could be possibly explained by the increased use of contract and casual workers, an issue exacerbated by the antagonistic relationship between management and the unions, at the ports. We also evaluate the resulting economic damages of the port-related accidents. In this analysis, contrary to our earlier results, we find that union membership has a negative impact on economic damages, while all other findings noted in the analysis on the number of accidents hold. Though this initially appears contradictory to the results on the number of accidents, it may be related, given the duties specifically performed by the aforementioned contract employees. We evaluate the robustness of the results from our initial models, which evaluated the number of accidents and economic damages based on efficiency estimates obtained by employing Data Envelopment Analysis, by comparison with those models in which the efficiency is estimated using Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Our findings could help policymakers improve planning and to better manage port traffic risks.

Keywords

risk management logistics/distribution port accidents maritime traffic port efficiency union membership 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions which helped them significantly in improving the quality of their work.

References

  1. Alattar, M.A., Karkare, B. and Rajhans, N. (2006) Simulation of container queues for port investment decisions. In: X.S. Zhang, D.G. Liu and L.Y. Wu (eds.) The Sixth International Symposium on Operations Research and Its Applications. 8–12 August, Xinjiang, Beijing, China: World Publishing Corporation, pp. 155–167.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, F. and Shimer, R. (2011) Unions and Unemployment. University of Chicago Working Paper, http://home.uchicago.edu/~falvare/unions-print.pdf, accessed 1 October 2014.
  3. American Association of Port Authorities. (2013) U.S. port industry, http://www.aapa-ports.org/Industry/content.cfm?ItemNumber=1022&navItemNumber=901, accessed 4 December 2014.
  4. Associated Press. (2014) US west coast ports face trade paralysis as unions and operators negotiate, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/23/west-coast-ports-unions-operators-negotiations, accessed 16 October 2014.
  5. Bechtel, M. (2007) After fatal accidents, unions put spotlight on port safety. People's World 14 December.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K. (2009) Microeconometrics Using Stata (Vol. 5). TX: Stata Press College Station.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, W.A. and Loeb, R.D. (2005) The determinants of train fatalities: Keeping the model on track. Transportation Research Part E 41(2): 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CNN. (2012) Why democrats need labor unions, http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/17/opinion/zelizer-labor-democrats/index.html, accessed 26 September 2014.
  9. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Tone, K. (2000) Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text With Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Cullinane, K. and Wang, T.F. (2010) The efficiency analysis of container port production using DEA panel data approaches. OR Spectrum 32(3): 717–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darbra, R.M. and Casal, J. (2004) Historical analysis of accidents in seaports. Safety Science 42(2): 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De, P. and Ghosh, B. (2003) Causality between performance and traffic: An investigation with Indian ports. Maritime Policy and Management 30(1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilbe, J. (2011) Negative Binomial Regression, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirsch, B.T., Macpherson, D.A. and Vroman, W.G. (2001) Estimates of union density by state. Monthly Labor Review 124(7): 51–55.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobs, R. (2001) Alternative methods to examine hospital efficiency: Data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Health Care Management Science 4(2): 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jin, D., Talley, W.K. and Kite-Powell, H. (2008) U.S. Ship Accident Research. London: Informa: Maritime Safety, Security and Piracy, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar
  17. Kaisar, E.I., Pathomsiri, S. and Haghani, A. (2006) Efficiency measurement of US ports using data envelopment analysis. National Urban Freight Conference, Long Beach, CA.Google Scholar
  18. Kulash, D.J. (2001) Capacity: The looming crisis. Transportation Quarterly 55(2): 3–5.Google Scholar
  19. Kumbhakar, S.C. and Lovell, C.A.K. (2000) Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. LaTourrette, T. and Willis, H.H. (2007) Using probabilistic terrorism risk modeling for regulatory benefit-cost analysis. Risk Analysis 28(2): 325–339.Google Scholar
  21. Loeb, P.D. and Clarke, W.A. (2007) The determinants of truck accidents. Transportation Research Part E 43(4): 442–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Madland, B. and Bunker, N. (2012) Unions boost economic mobility in U.S. states. Center for American Progress Action Fund, http://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/labor/report/2012/09/20/38624/unions-boost-economic-mobility-in-u-s-states/, accessed 2 October 2014.
  23. Maloni, M. and Paul, J. (2013) Evaluating capacity options for the North American west coast container ports. Transportation Journal 52(1): 52–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mankiw, G. (2008) Principles of Economics, 5th edn.South-Western: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  25. Martin Associates. (2014) Economic impact and competitiveness of the west coast ports and factors that could threaten growth. Prepared for Pacific Maritime Association, http://www.pmanet.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/West-Coast-Ports-Economic-Impact-and-Competitiveness.pdf, accessed 14 October 2014.
  26. Mongelluzzo, B. (2016) ILWU, PMA open door to contract extension. The Journal of Commerce, 1 March, http://www.joc.com/maritime-news/labor/ilwu-pma-open-door-contract-extension_20160301.html, accessed 6 March 2016.
  27. New York Times. (2011) The effects of union membership on democratic voting, http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/26/the-effects-of-union-membership-on-democratic-voting/, accessed 28 September 2014.
  28. New York Times. (2016) New York-area ports shut down as longshoremen walk off the job, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/30/nyregion/new-york-area-ports-longshoremen.html, accessed 15 February 2016.
  29. NOAA. (2008) The importance of monitoring the tides and their currents, http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/kits/tides/tides09_monitor.html, accessed 28 February 2016.
  30. NOAA. (2014) Value of PORTS to the nation, http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/news/aug14/Value_of_PORTS_to_the_Nation.pdf, accessed 13 May 2015.
  31. Or, I. and Kahraman, I. (2002) A simulation study of the accident risk in the Istanbul Channel. International Journal of Emergency Management 1(2): 110–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paul, J. and Maloni, M. (2010) Modeling the effects of port disasters. Maritime Economics & Logistics 12(2): 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Personal Communication. (2016) Personal Correspondence with Claims Personnel. South Carolina: Ports Authority.Google Scholar
  34. Port Technologies International. (2013) The reality of assessing accident levels in ports (56): 15–16, https://www.porttechnology.org/images/uploads/technical_papers/The_reality_of_assessing_accident_levels_in_ports.pdf, accessed 23 February 2016.
  35. Ronza, A., Felez, S., Darbra, R.M., Carol, S., Vilchez, J.A. and Casal, J. (2003) Predicting the frequency of accidents in port areas by developing event trees from historical analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 16(6): 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schlozman, D. (2013) The alliance of U.S. labor unions and the democratic party. Scholars Strategy Network, http://www.scholarsstrategynetwork.org/sites/default/files/ssn_basic_facts_schlozman_on_why_labor_unions_ally_with_the_democrats.pdf, accessed 1 October 2014.
  37. Schonfeld, P. and Sharafeldien, O. (1985) Optimal berth and crane combinations in container ports. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering 111(6): 1060–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stata. (2014) www.stata.com.
  39. Talley, W.K. (2002) Maritime safety and accident analysis. In: C. Grammenos (ed.) The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business. London: Lloyds of London Press, pp. 426–442.Google Scholar
  40. Talley, W.K. (2010a) Vessel safety and accident analysis. In: C. Grammenos (ed.) The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business. London: Lloyds of London Press, pp. 519–535.Google Scholar
  41. Talley, W.K. (2010b) Labor unions and transport. In: K. Button, P. Nijkamp and H. Vega (eds.) A Dictionary of Transport Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 229–230.Google Scholar
  42. Tauman, Y. and Weiss, Y. (1987) Labour unions and the adoption of new technology. Journal of Labour Economics 5(4): 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uluscu, S.O., Ozbas, B., Altıok, T., Or, I. and Yılmaz, T. (2009) Transit vessel scheduling in the strait of Istanbul. Journal of Navigation 62(1): 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. USCG. (2005) Vessel Traffic Service San Francisco User's Manual. http://www.uscg.mil/d11/vtssf/vtssfum.asp#01112013rev, accessed 28 February 2016.
  45. U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration. (2009) Vessel Calls Snapshot, 2008. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  46. Wang, T.F. and Cullinane, K. (2006) The efficiency of european container terminals and implications for supply chain management. Maritime Economics & Logistics 8(1): 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. World Bank. (2014) GDP deflator, http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.DEFL.ZS, accessed 21 March 2014.
  48. Yip, T.L. (2008) Port traffic risks – a study of accidents in Hong Kong waters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 44(5): 921–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jomon Aliyas Paul
    • 1
  • Leo MacDonald
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics, Finance & Quantitative Analysis, Coles College of Business, Kennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA

Personalised recommendations