Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 399–417 | Cite as

Time at ports in short sea shipping: When timing is crucial

  • Ancor Suárez-Alemán
  • Lourdes Trujillo
  • Kevin P B Cullinane
Original Article

Abstract

From the perspective of Short Sea Shipping (SSS), as an intermodal competitor in the freight market, the time spent within the whole transport corridor is a major issue, in contrast to deep sea shipping where differences in time may not be as relevant as, for example, the contract of carriage or a ship’s position, among other aspects. Although there exist numerous studies that have estimated port or terminal efficiency, most have focused on quantities as outputs and factors such as labour force or capital as inputs, mainly through the use of techniques such as data envelopment analysis or stochastic frontier analysis. The structure of the time ships spend in ports has generally not been considered. After reviewing the port efficiency literature and by taking into consideration the structure of the time ships spend in SSS ports or terminals, this article develops a theoretical analysis of this concept and proposes the direct utilization of the time in ports as a suitable measure for port efficiency analysis. From an empirical example, we show how the inclusion of time in efficiency analysis can modify the results derived from a more traditional approach based just on quantities.

Keywords

port efficiency port times short sea shipping data envelopment analysis 

References

  1. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 (9): 1078–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baños-Pino, J., Coto-Millán, P. and Rodriguez-Álvarez, A. (1999) Allocative efficiency and over-capitalization: An application. International Journal of Transport Economics 26 (2): 181–199.Google Scholar
  3. Barros, C.P. (2003) Incentive regulation and efficiency of Portuguese port authorities. Maritime Economics & Logistics 5 (1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barros, C.P. (2004) The measurement of efficiency of Portuguese sea port authorities with DEA. International Journal of Transport Economics XXX (3): 335–354.Google Scholar
  5. Barros, C.P. (2005) Decomposing growth in Portuguese seaports: A frontier cost approach. Maritime Economics & Logistics 7 (4): 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barros, C.P. (2006) A benchmark analysis of italian seaports using data envelopment analysis. Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (4): 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barros, C.P. and Athanassiou, M. (2004) Efficiency in European seaports with DEA: Evidence from Greece and Portugal. Maritime Economics & Logistics 6 (2): 122–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bendall, H. and Brooks, M. (2011) Short sea shipping: lessons for or from Australia. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 3 (4): 384–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blonigen, B.A. and Wilson, W.W. (2006) New measures of port efficiency using international trade data. NBER working paper series. Working Paper 12502. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  10. Bonilla, M., Casasus, T., Medal, A. and Sala, R. (2004) An efficiency analysis of the Spanish port system. International Journal of Transport Economics XXXI (3): 379–400.Google Scholar
  11. Brooks, M.R. and Cullinane, K.B.P. (2006) Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance. Research in Transportation Economics 17. Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Brooks, M.R. and Frost, J.D. (2004) Short sea shipping: a Canadian perspective. Maritime Policy and Management 31 (4): 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, X., Dollar, D. and Micco, A. (2000) Maritime transport costs and port efficiency. World Bank, February (mimeo).Google Scholar
  14. Chang, S. (1978) In defence of port economic impact studies. Transportation Journal 17 (3): 79–85.Google Scholar
  15. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E.L. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (6): 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. COM. (2011) White Paper. Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. European Commission.Google Scholar
  17. COM. (2003) The programme for the promotion of Short Sea Shipping. Communication from the European Commission. Brussels, 8 april. 155 final.Google Scholar
  18. Containerization International Yearbook. (2012) Informa Trade and Energy Publishing. ISBN: 9781843119906.Google Scholar
  19. Coto-Millán, P., Baños-Pino, J. and Rodríguez-Álvarez, A. (2000) Economic efficiency in Spanish ports: Some empirical evidence. Maritime Policy & Management 27 (2): 169–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cullinane, K.P.B. (2010) Revisiting the productivity and efficiency of ports and terminals: Methods and applications. In: C. Grammenos (ed.) Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business. London: Informa Publications, pp. 907–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cullinane, K.P.B. and Song, D.-W. (2003) A stochastic frontier model of the productive efficiency of korean container terminals. Applied Economics 35 (3): 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cullinane, K.P.B., Song, D.-W. and Gray, R. (2002) A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: Assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures. Transportation Research A 36 (8): 743–762.Google Scholar
  23. Cullinane, K.P.B., Song, P.J. and Wang, T.F. (2005) The application of mathematical programming approaches to estimating container port production efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis 24 (1): 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cullinane, K.P.B, Song, D.-W., Ji, P. and Wang, T.-F. (2004) An application of DEA windows analysis to container port production efficiency. Review of Network Economics 3 (2): 186–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cullinane, K.P.B. and Song, D.-W. (2006) Estimating the relative efficiency of European container ports: A stochastic frontier analysis. In: K.P.B. Cullinane and W.K. Talley (eds.) Port Economics, Research in Transportation Economics. Vol. XVI Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier, pp. 85–115.Google Scholar
  26. Cullinane, K.P.B. and Wang, T.-F. (2006) The efficiency of European container ports: A cross-sectional data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 9 (1): 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cullinane, K.P.B. and Wang, T. (2010) The efficiency analysis of container port production using DEA panel data approaches. OR Spectrum 32 (3): 717–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cullinane, K.P.B., Wang, T.-F., Song, D.-W. and Ji, P. (2006) The technical efficiency of container ports: Comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice 40 (4): 354–374.Google Scholar
  29. De Rus, G., Campos, J. and Nombela, G. (2003) Economía del Transporte. A. Bosch (ed.), Barcelona, Spain, ISBN: 84-95348-08-X.Google Scholar
  30. Devlin, J. and Yee, P. (2005) Trade logistics in developing countries: The case of the Middle East and North Africa. World Economy 28 (3): 435–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Djankov, S., Freund, C. and Pham, C.S. (2006) Trading on time. Mimeo, The World Bank.Google Scholar
  32. Estache, A., González, M. and Trujillo, L. (2002) Efficiency gains from port reform and the potencial for yardstick competition: Lessons from Mexico. World Development 30 (4): 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Estache, A., Tovar De La Fe, B. and Trujillo, L. (2004) Sources of efficiency gains in port reform: A DEA decomposition of a malmquist TFP index for Mexico. Utilities Policy 12 (4): 21–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. González, M.M. and Trujillo, L. (2008) Reforms and infrastructure efficiency in Spain’s container ports. Transportation Research A 42 (1): 243–257.Google Scholar
  35. González, M. and Trujillo, L. (2009) Efficiency measurement in the port industry: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Transport Economic and Policy 43 (2): 157–192.Google Scholar
  36. Hummels, D. (2001) Time as a Trade Barrier. Purdue University, July (mimeo).Google Scholar
  37. Hung, S.-H., Lu, W.-M. and Wang, T.P. (2010) Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports. European Journal of Operational Research 203 (3): 706–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Itoh, H. (2002) Efficiency changes at major container ports in Japan: A window application of data envelopment analysis. Review of Urban and regional Development Studies 14 (2): 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, H., Chou, M. and Kuo, S. (2005) Evaluating port efficiency in Asia pacific region with recursive data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 6: 544–559.Google Scholar
  40. Liu, C.-C. (2008) Evaluating the operational efficiency of major ports in the Asia-Pacific region using data envelopment analysis. Applied Economics 40 (13): 1737–1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu, Z. (1995) The comparative performance of public and private enterprises: The case of British ports. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 29 (3): 263–274.Google Scholar
  42. Maksimavičius, R. (2004) Some elements of the RoRo terminals. Transport 19 (2): 75–81.Google Scholar
  43. Martínez-Budria, E., Díaz-Armas, R., Navarro-Ibañez, M. and Ravelo-Mesa, T. (1999) A study of the efficiency of Spanish port authorities using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Transport Economics XXVI (2): 237–253.Google Scholar
  44. Marlow, P.B. and Paixão Casaca, A.C. (2004) Short sea shipping and its role in logistics supply chains: A European perspective. Journal of International Logistics and Trade 2 (1): 57–68.Google Scholar
  45. Musso, E. and Marchese, U. (2002) Economics of short sea shipping. In: T.H. Costas Grammenos (ed.) The Hanbook of Maritime Economics and Business. LLP; Informa professional.Google Scholar
  46. Notteboom, T, Coeck, C. and Van Den Broeck, J. (2000) Measuring and explaining the relative efficiency of container terminals by means of Bayesian stochastic frontier models. International Journal of Maritime Economics 2 (2): 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nordas, H.K. (2006) Time as a trade barrier: Implications for low-income countries. OECD Economic Studies No. 42.Google Scholar
  48. Paixão, A.C. and Marlow, P.B. (2002) Strengths and weaknesses of short sea shipping. Marine Policy 26 (3): 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Park, R.-K. and De, P. (2004) An alternative approach to efficiency measurement of seaports. Maritime Economics & Logistics 6 (1): 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Perakis, A. and Denisis, A. (2008) A survey of short sea shipping and its prospects in the USA. Maritime Policy and Management 35 (6): 591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Quaresma Dias, J.C., Calado, J.M.F. and Mendonça, M.C. (2010) The role of European «ro-ro» port terminals in the automotive supply chain management. Journal of Transport Geography 18 (2010): 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Raballand, G., Refas, S. and Beuran, M., and Isik, G. (2012) Why does cargo spend weeks in Sub-Saharan African Ports. Lessons from six countries. Directions in Development, Trade; The World Bank, ISBN:978-0-8213-9499-1.Google Scholar
  53. Rios, L.R. and Gastaud Maçada, A.C. (2006) Analysing the relative efficiency of container terminals of mercosur using DEA. Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (4): 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roll, Y. and Hayuth, Y. (1993) Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). Maritime Policy and Management 20 (2): 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saldanha, J. and Gray, R. (2002) The potential for British coastal shipping in a multimodal chain. Maritime Policy & Management 29 (1): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sánchez, R. and Wilmsmeier, G. (2005) Short-sea shipping potential in Central America to bridge infrastructural gaps. Maritime Policy & Management 32 (2): 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sánchez, R., Hoffmann, J., Micco, A., Pizzolitto, G., Sgut, M and Wilmsmeier, G. (2003) Port efficiency and international trade: Port efficiency as a determinant of maritime transport costs. Maritime economics & logistics 5 (2): 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Suárez-Alemán, A., Campos, J. and Jimenez, J.L. (2014) The economic competitiveness of short sea shipping: An empirical assessment for Spanish ports. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  59. Tongzon, J. (2001) Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research 35A (2): 107–122.Google Scholar
  60. Tongzon, J. and Heng, W. (2005) Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research A 39 (5): 405–424.Google Scholar
  61. Turner, H., Windle, R. and Dresner, M. (2004) North American containerport productivity: 1984–1997. Transportation Research E 40 (4): 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Valentine, V.F. and Gray, R. (2001) The measurement of port efficiency using data envelopment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Transport Research, 22–27 July, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
  63. Wang, T. and Cullinane, K.P.B. (2006) The efficiency of European container terminals and implications for supply chain management. Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (1): 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilmsmeier, G., Hoffmann, J. and Sánchez, R. (2006) The impact of port characteristics on international maritime transport costs. Research in Transportation Economics 16 (1): 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yan, J., Sun, X. and Liu, J.J. (2009) Assessing container operator efficiency with heterogeneous and time-varying production frontiers. Transportation Research B 43 (1): 172–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ancor Suárez-Alemán
    • 1
  • Lourdes Trujillo
    • 1
  • Kevin P B Cullinane
    • 2
  1. 1.Applied Economics DepartmentUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas Palmas de Gran CanariaSpain
  2. 2.School of Business, Economics and Law, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations