Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 158–173 | Cite as

Analysis of the potential contribution of value-adding services (VAS) to the competitive logistics strategy of ports

  • Chukwuneke Okorie
  • Nicoleta Tipi
  • Nick Hubbard
Original Article

Abstract

This article examines the potential contribution of value-adding services (VAS) to port logistics strategy development in order to enhance competitiveness in the face of increasing competition between ports. On the basis of an empirical study taking the critical-realist approach of mixed methods’ research and using data from multiple case-study ports in both developed and developing countries, the relevance and deployment of VAS are assessed with a view to facilitating port strategy decisions. This study addresses the paucity of VAS investigations in the maritime logistics literature and examines the potential contribution of VAS to port competitiveness from the perspective of port users. Results demonstrate that the most readily available and accessible VAS are transport services, followed by warehousing and water supplies. The article concludes that VAS have the potential to both attract port users and retain them.

Keywords

value-adding services logistics ports competition and strategy 

References

  1. Ainsworth, S. (1992) The Impact of Information Technology on Warehouse Operations. Cardiff, UK: University of Cardiff.Google Scholar
  2. Analytiqa. (2007) Portcentric logistics- the supply chain of the future, http://www.analytiqa.com, accessed 15 October 2008.
  3. Anderson, C., Park, Y., Chang, Y., Yang, C., Lee, T. and Luo, M. (2008) A game-theoretic analysis of competition among hub ports: The case of busan and shanghai. Maritime Policy Management 35 (1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. APC. (2001) Amsterdam port consultants introduction, http://amsterdamportconsultants.com/smartsite9560.dws, accessed 15 August 2007.
  5. ABP-Associated British Port. (2007) Ports Handbook 2007: The UK’s Number one Ports Operator. UK: Associated British Port.Google Scholar
  6. Au, K. and Ho, D. (2002) Electronic commerce and supply chain management: Value- adding services for clothing manufacturers. Integrated Manufacturing System 13 (4): 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beresford, A., Gardner, B., Pettit, S., Naniopoulos, A. and Wooldridge, C. (2004) The UNCTAD and WORKPORT models of port development: Evolution or revolution? Maritime Policy Management 31 (2): 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bichou, K. and Gray, R. (2004) A logistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measure. Maritime Policy Management 31 (1): 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowersox, D. and Closs, D. (1996) Logistical Management- The Integrated Supply Chain Process. Singapore: McGraw-Hill companies Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Bowersox, D., Closs, D. and Cooper, B. (2007) Supply Chain Logistics Management, 2nd edn. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Bruns, W. (1989) A review of Robert K. Yin’s case study research: Design and methods. Journal of Management Accounting Research 1: 157–163.Google Scholar
  12. Chan, J., Burns, N. and Yung, K. (2000) Environmental – Strategy fit: A study of Hong Kong manufacturing logistics. Logistics Information Management 13 (5): 286–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chernatony, L. and Harris, F. (2000) Added value: It nature, roles and sustainability. European Journal of Marketing 34 (1/2): 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christopher, M. (2005) Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Creating Value-Adding Networks, 3rd edn. Great Britain, UK: Pearson education limited.Google Scholar
  15. Christopher, M., Payne, A. and Ballantyne, D. (2002) Relationship Marketing: Creating Stakeholders Value. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  16. Cooper, D. and Schindler, P. (2006) Business Research Methods, 9th edn. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Cousin, G. (2005) Case study research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 29 (3): 421–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cudahy, B. (2006) The containership revolution, transport research board of the national academies: Washington DC, http://www.worldshipping.org/pdf/container_ship_revolution.pdf, accessed 20 April 2008.
  19. The Economist. (2009) Thriving on adversity, 10 March, 392(8651): p. 82.Google Scholar
  20. Edvardsson, B. and Olsson, J. (1996) Key concepts for service development. The Service Industries Journal 16 (2): 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. European Commission. (2012) Maritime ports freight and passenger statistics, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu, accessed 27 November 2014.
  22. ESPO. (n.d) European sea port organisation, http://www.espo.be/, accessed 14 August 2014.
  23. Fernie, J. and Sparks, L. (2004) Logistics and Retail Management: Insights into Practice and Trends from Leading Experts, 2nd edn. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  24. Field, A. (2009) Discovering Statistics – Using SPSS, 3rd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Fletcher, D. and Hardill, I. (1995) Value- adding competitive strategies: A comparison of clothing SMEs case studies in France and Great Britain. International Small Business Journal 14 (1): 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Galetzka, M., Verhoeven, J. and Pruyn, A. (2006) Service validity and Service reliability of search, experience and credence services: A scenario study. International Journal of Service Industry Management 17 (3): 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gattorna, J. (2003) Handbook of Supply Chain Management. UK: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Goss, R. (1990) Economic policies and seaports: 4 strategies for port authorities. Maritime Policy Management 17 (4): 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haezendonck, E., Coeck, C. and Verbeke, A. (2000) The competitive position of seaports: Introduction of the value added concept. International Journal of Maritime Economics 2 (2): 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haezendonck, E. and Winkelmans, W. (2002) Strategic positioning as an instrument for competition analysis. In: M. Huybrechts, H. Meersman, E. Van de Voorde, E. Van Hooydonk, A. Verbeke and W. Winkelmans (eds.) Port Competitiveness: An Economic and Legal Analysis of the Factors Determining the Competitiveness of Seaports. Antwerp, Belgium: De Boeck, pp. 67–87.Google Scholar
  31. Haralambides, H. (1997) Ports in the framework of the EU transport policy, Centre of Maritime Economics And Logistics (MEL), Rotterdam, the Netherlands: University of Erasmus, http://www.maritimeeconomics.com/downloads/papers/HH_GP_FINAL.pdf, accessed 26 June 2007.
  32. Haralambides, H. (2012) Ports in the framework of EU transport policy, http://www.academia.edu/2263185/Ports_in_the_Framework_of_EU_Transport_Policy, accessed 10 May 2013.
  33. Haralambides, H., Ma, S. and Veenstra, A. (1997) Worldwide experiences of port reforms, In: Meersman, H. and Voorde, E. (eds.) Transforming the Port and Transportation Business, Leuven: Acco Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Harwell, M. (2011) Research design in qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods. In: C. Conrad and R. Serlin (eds.) The SAGE Handbook for Research in Education: Pursuing Ideas as the Keystone of Exemplary Inquiry, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heaver, T. (2006) The evolution and challenges of port economics. Research in Transport Economics 16: 11–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jeannet, J. and Hennessey, H. (1998) Global Marketing Strategies, 4th edn. Boston, USA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2005) Exploring Corporate strategy, 7th edn. England, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  38. Lobo, A. and Jain, V. (2002) ‘Port users’ perspective of container transhipment business: Hierarchy of service attributes and dimensions. Singapore Maritime and Port Journal 4: 154–161.Google Scholar
  39. Ma, H. (2004) Toward global competitive advantage: Creation, competition, cooperation and co-option. Management Decision 42 (7): 907–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malhotra, N. (2010) Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, 6th edn. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Mangan, J., Lalwani, C. and Fynes, B. (2008) Port-centric logistics. The International Journal of Logistics Management 19 (1): 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA). (n.d.) Singapore an international maritime centre: A strategic centre for maritime business, http://www.mpa.gov.sg/sites/pdf/infokit4.pdf, accessed 13 August 2010.
  43. Okorie, C. and Tipi, N. (2008) An empirical view of value-adding services strategy in ports of developing economies. In: A. Lyons (ed.) Logistics Research Network, 10th–12th Sept. 2008. Liverpool, UK: CILT/University of Liverpool, pp. 159–164.Google Scholar
  44. Panda, J., Araju, A. and Maqueda, F. (2005) Marketing management at the world’s major ports. Maritime policy management 32 (2): 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. PD Teesport and Hartlepool. (2008) PD Teesport and Hartlepool Handbook, Opportunity Knocks for the Northern Port Community. UK: PD ports.Google Scholar
  46. Pettit, S. and Beresford, A. (2009) Port developments from port gateways to hubs. Maritime Policy Management 36 (3): 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Porter, M. (1986) Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Powell, T. (2001) Competitive advantage: Logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic Management Journal 22: 875–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Proctor, T. (2005) Essentials of Marketing Research, 4th edn. England, UK: Pearson Edu.Google Scholar
  50. Song, D. and Lee, P. (2009) Maritime logistics in the global supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 12 (2): 83–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stopford, M. (2009) Maritime Economics, 3rd edn. Great Britain, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tashakkori, A. (2009) Are we there yet? The state of the mixed methods community. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3 (4): 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Teddlie, C. and Tashakkori, A. (2009) Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  54. Ugboma, C., Ibe, C. and Ugwude, I. (2004) Service quality measurements in ports of a developing economy: Nigerian ports survey. Managing Service Quality 14 (6): 487–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. UNCTAD. (1992) Port marketing and the challenge of the third generation ports, TD/B/C.4/AC.7/14, Geneva, Switzerland, http://r0.unctad.org/ttl/ttl-docs-titles.htm, accessed 14 October, 2010.Google Scholar
  56. UNCTAD. (1993) Legal aspect of port management, UNCTAD/SHIP/639; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/poshipd639.en.pdf, accessed 11 August 2008.
  57. UNESCAP. (2003) Commercial Development of Regional Ports as Logistics Centres. New York: UNITED NATIONS.Google Scholar
  58. Wall, G. (2007) Heading for the coast: Is port-centric logistics the way forward. Focus October: 42–44.Google Scholar
  59. Walters, D., Holladay, M. and Glaser, S. (2002) Added value, enterprise and competitive advantage. Management Decision 40 (9): 823–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson, B. (1979) Creating and sharing wealth: The added value approach (part 1). Employee Relations 1 (1): 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wood, E. (1978) Comments on a recent article on added value. Industrial and Commercial Training 10 (8): 332–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yin, R. (2009) Case study research: Design and methods, 4th edn. California: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chukwuneke Okorie
    • 1
  • Nicoleta Tipi
    • 2
  • Nick Hubbard
    • 2
  1. 1.International Shipping and Logistics Group, Plymouth Graduate School of Management, Sutton Harbour, Plymouth UniversityPL4 8AA, PlymouthUK
  2. 2.Logistics and Transport Research Group, University of Huddersfield Business SchoolHD1 3DH, HuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations