Advertisement

Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 44–60 | Cite as

A directional relationship between freight and newbuilding markets: A panel analysis

  • Jane Jing Xu
  • Tsz Leung Yip
  • Liming Liu
Original Article

Abstract

This article examines the dynamic relationship between international sea freight rate and newbuilding price by employing panel cointegration testing and estimating techniques. The primary question this article addresses is whether the goods (new ships) price and service (sea freight) rate lead or lag one another in a Granger-cause sense, or simultaneously move together. Monthly panel data on three different bulk shipping market segments over the period 1998–2009 are exploited in empirical analysis. Various panel unit root tests demonstrate that the data variables are integrated with unit roots, whereas panel cointegration techniques are used to estimate the dynamic relationship. A positive directional relationship from freight rate to newbuilding price is found, and freight rate is more sensitive to market changes than newbuilding price. These results indicate that investment in new ships is encouraged by a strong freight market.

Keywords

cross-market analysis newbuilding price freight rate panel unit root panel cointegration VECM 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the comments received when the preliminary results of this study were presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Decision Science Institute and the 2008 International Forum of Shipping, Ports and Airports. They also thank the referees for their comments and suggestions on this article.

References

  1. Alizadeh, A.H. and Nomikos, N.K. (2007) Investment timing and trading strategies in the sale and purchase market for ships. Transportation Research Part B 41 (1): 126–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alizadeh, A.H. and Nomikos, N.K. (2009) Shipping Derivatives and Risk Management. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltagi, B.H. (2008) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 4th edn. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Batchelor, R.A., Alizadeh, A.H. and Visbikis, I.D. (2005) The relation between bid-ask spreads and price volatility in forward markets. Derivatives Use, Trading & Regulations 11 (2): 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beenstock, M. and Vergottis, A. (1989) An econometric model of the world market for dry cargo freight and shipping. Applied Economics 21 (3): 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beenstock, M. and Vergottis, A. (1993) Econometric Modelling of World Shipping. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  7. de Borger, B. and Nonneman, W. (1981) Statistical cost functions for dry bulk carriers. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 15 (2): 155–165.Google Scholar
  8. Breitung, J. (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: B.H. Baltagi (ed.) Advances in Econometrics: Non-stationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: JAI Press, pp. 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breitung, J. and Pesaran, M.H. (2008) Unit roots and cointegration in panels. In: L. Matyas and P. Sevestre (eds.) The Econometrics of Panel Data: Fundamentals and Recent Developments in Theory and Practice, 3rd edn. Berlin: Springer, Chapter 9, pp. 279–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarkson. (2009) Shipping Intelligence Network. London: Clarkson Shipping Services Group.Google Scholar
  11. Dikos, G. (2004) New building prices: Demand inelastic or perfectly competitive? Maritime Economics and Logistics 6 (4): 312–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.J. (1987) Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55 (2): 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, J.J. and Marlow, P.B. (1990) Quantitative Methods in Maritime Economics, 2nd edn. London: Fairplay.Google Scholar
  14. Glen, D.R. (2006) The modelling of dry bulk and tanker markets: A survey. Maritime Policy and Management 33 (5): 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Granger, C.W.J. (1986) Developments in the study of cointegrated economic variables. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 48 (3): 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hadri, K. (2000) Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometrics Journal 3 (2): 148–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haralambides, H.E., Tsolakis, S.D. and Cridland, C. (2004) Econometric modelling of newbuilding and second ship prices. Research in Transportation Economics 12 (1): 65–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawdon, D. (1978) Tanker freight rates in the short and long run. Applied Economics 10 (3): 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hsu, J.L. and Goodwin, B.K. (1995) Dynamic relationships in the market for the ocean grain freighting services. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 43 (2): 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H. and Shin, Y. (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 11 (591): 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kavussanos, M.G. (1996) Comparisons of volatility in the dry-cargo ship sector: Spot versus time charters, and smaller versus larger vessels. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 30 (1): 67–82.Google Scholar
  22. Kavussanos, M.G. and Nomikos, N.K. (2003) Price discovery, causality and forecasting in the freight futures market. Review of Derivatives Research 6 (3): 203–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kavussanos, M.G. and Visvikis, I.D. (2004) Market interactions in returns and volatilities between spot and forward shipping freight markets. Journal of Banking and Finance 28 (8): 2015–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kavussanos, M.G. and Visvikis, I.D. (2006) Derivatives and Risk Management in Shipping. London: Witherbys.Google Scholar
  25. Koekebakker, S., Adland, R.O. and Sodal, S. (2006) Are spot freight rates stationary? Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 40 (3): 449–472.Google Scholar
  26. Levin, A., Lin, C.F. and Chu, C.S.J. (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lutkepohl, H. (1991) Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maddala, G.S. and Wu, S. (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (S1): 631–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mulligan, R.F. (2008) A simple model for estimating newbuilding costs. Maritime Economics and Logistics 10 (3): 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pesaran, H.H. and Shin, Y. (1998) Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters 58 (1): 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sims, C. (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48 (1): 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stopford, M. (2009) Maritime Economics, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsolakis, S.D. (2005) Econometric analysis of bulk shipping markets implications for investment strategies and financial decision-making. PhD thesis, Department of Econometrics, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  34. Tsolakis, S.D., Cridland, C. and Haralambides, H.E. (2003) Econometric modelling of second-hand ship prices. Maritime Economics & Logistics 5 (4): 347–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Veenstra, A.W. (1999) The term structure of ocean freight rates. Maritime Policy and Management 26 (3): 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane Jing Xu
    • 1
  • Tsz Leung Yip
    • 2
  • Liming Liu
    • 2
  1. 1.Cardiff Business School, Cardiff UniversityCardiffUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Department of Logistics and Maritime StudiesFaculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung HomHong Kong

Personalised recommendations