Advertisement

Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 127–146 | Cite as

Modeling the effects of port disasters

  • Jomon Aliyas Paul
  • Michael J Maloni
Original Article

Abstract

Weather or terrorism-related disasters at seaports can lead to significant economic losses from vessel and cargo delays. In times of such disasters, port capacities and optimal shipment routings would change rapidly, requiring near real-time analyses for planning response operations. To address this challenge, we offer a decision support system to help port networks analyze disaster response scenarios. As part of the model, an algorithm routes arriving ships to ports to optimize the use of network capacity with respect to ocean and inland transportation, port and inventory capital costs. To reflect changing port congestion conditions, port capacities are dynamically updated in the algorithm by regression-based parametric metamodels derived from the results of a simulation model. Demonstrating application through case studies of the North American container port network, we illustrate the magnitude of cost increases from disaster-based port shutdowns and highlight the practical need for coordinated, network-wide planning for disaster response.

Keywords

container port simulation decision support systems disaster planning transportation security 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Marius Gligor of Hapag Lloyd as well as other Hapag Lloyd, carrier and port resources for providing port operations expertise and data.

References

  1. AAPA. (2008) Port industry statistics. American Association of Port Authorities, http://www.aapa-ports.org, accessed 9 July 2008.
  2. Alattar, M.A., Karkare, B. and Rajhans, N. (2006) Simulation of container queues for port investment decisions. In: X.S. Zhang, D.G. Liu and L.Y. Wu (eds.), The Sixth International Symposium on Operations Research and Its Applications; 8–12 August, Xinjiang, China. Beijing: World Publishing Corporation, pp. 155–167.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, C.M., Opaluch, J.J. and Grigalunas, T.A. (2009) The demand for import services at U.S. container ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics 11 (2): 156–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bichou, K. (2004) The ISPS code and the cost of port compliance: An initial logistics and supply chain framework for port security assessment and management. Maritime Economics & Logistics 6 (4): 322–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bielli, M., Boulmakoul, A. and Rida, M. (2006) Object oriented model for container terminal distributed simulation. European Journal of Operational Research 175 (3): 1731–1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Branislav, D., Nam Kyu, P., Zoran, R. and Vladislav, M. (2005) Simulation modelling of ship-berth link with priority service. Maritime Economics & Logistics 7 (4): 316–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks, M.R. and Button, K.J. (2006) Market structures and shipping security. Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (1): 100–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casaca, A.C.P. (2005) Simulation and the lean port environment. Maritime Economics & Logistics 7 (3): 262–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Containerisation International. (2005) Containerisation International Yearbook 2005. London: Informa Maritime and Transport.Google Scholar
  10. Cochrane, R.A. (2008) The effects of market differences on the throughput of large container terminals with similar levels of efficiency. Maritime Economics & Logistics 10 (1–2): 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Defilippi, E. (2004) Intra-port competition, regulatory challenges and the concession of Callao port. Maritime Economics & Logistics 6 (4): 279–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DiBenedetto, B. (2007) Coping with disaster. Journal of Commerce Online, http://www.joc.com, accessed 9 April.
  13. Fagerholt, K. and Lindstad, H. (2007) TurboRouter: An interactive optimisation-based decision support system for ship routing and scheduling. Maritime Economics & Logistics 9 (3): 214–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerencser, M., Weinberg, J. and Vincent, D. (2002) Port security war game: Implications for U.S. supply chains, http://www.boozallen.com/media/file/128648.pdf, accessed 7 July 2007.
  15. Gordon, P., Moore II, J., Richardson, H. and Pan, Q. (2005) The Economic Impact of a Terrorist Attack on the Twin Ports of Los Angeles-Long Beach. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  16. Isidore, C. (2002) Bush to seek order to reopen ports. CNNMoney, http://money.cnn.com/2002/10/08/news/ports/index.htm, accessed 17 September 2007.
  17. Journal of Commerce. (2008) Ports America CEO Tilden predicts cargo diversion, http://www.joc.com, accessed 31 January.
  18. Jula, H., Chassiakos, A. and Ioannou, P. (2006) Port dynamic empty container reuse. Transportation Research Part E 42E (1): 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leach, P.T. (2007) U.S. mulls national port strategy: MARAD Administrator. Journal of Commerce Online, http://www.joc.com, accessed 16 November.
  20. Legato, P., Canonaco, P. and Mazz, R.M. (2009) Yard crane management by simulation and optimisation. Maritime Economics & Logistics 11 (1): 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lim, A., Rodrigues, B. and Song, L. (2004) Manpower allocation with time windows. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 55 (11): 1178–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luo, M. and Grigalunas, T.A. (2003) A spatial-economic multimodal transportation simulation model for U.S. coastal container ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics 5 (2): 158–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maloni, M.J. and Jackson, E.C. (2005) North American container port capacity: An exploratory analysis. Transportation Journal 44 (3): 1–22.Google Scholar
  24. Mongelluzzo, B. (2007) West Coast employers aiming for early longshore pact. Journal of Commerce Online, http://www.joc.com, accessed 12 June 2007.
  25. Ottjes, J.A., Veeke, H.P.M., Duinkerken, M.B., Rijsenbrij, J.C. and Lodewijks, G. (2006) Simulation of a multiterminal system for container handling. OR Spectrum 28 (4): 447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Park, J., Gordon, P., Moore, J.E. and Richardson, H.W. (2008) The state-by-state economic impacts of the 2002 shutdown of the Los Angeles-Long Beach ports. Growth and Change 39 (4): 548–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parola, F. and Sciomachen, A. (2009) Modal split evaluation of a maritime container terminal. Maritime Economics & Logistics 11 (1): 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paul, J.A., George, S.K., Yi, P. and Lin, L. (2006) Transient modeling in simulation of hospital operations for emergency response. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 41 (4): 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pinto, C.A. and Talley, W.K. (2006) The security incident cycle of ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (3): 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ProModel. (2007) Decision making tools and techniques – ProModel, http://www.promodel.com/, accessed 7 March 2007.
  31. Psaraftis, H.N. (2005) EU ports policy: Where do we go from here? Maritime Economics & Logistics 7 (1): 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosoff, H. and von Winterfeldt, D. (2007) A risk and economic analysis of dirty bomb attacks on the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Risk Analysis 27 (3): 533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schonfeld, P. and Sharafeldien, O. (1985) Optimal berth and crane combinations in container ports. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering 111 (6): 1060–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Silberholz, M.B., Golden, B.L. and Baker, E.K. (1991) Using simulation to study the impact of work rules on productivity at marine container terminals. Computers & Operations Research 18 (5): 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Song, D.P. and Dong, J.X. (2008) Empty container management in cyclic shipping routes. Maritime Economics & Logistics 10 (4): 335–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stares, J. (2008) Europe takes box scanning fight to U.S. Congress. Lloyd's List, http://lloydslist.com, accessed 18 February.
  37. Stasinopoulos, D. (2003) Maritime security: The need for a global agreement. Maritime Economics & Logistics 5 (3): 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thai, V.V. (2007) Impacts of security improvements on service quality in maritime transport: An empirical study of Vietnam. Maritime Economics & Logistics 9 (4): 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thai, V.V. and Grewal, D. (2007) The maritime security management system: Perceptions of the international shipping community. Maritime Economics & Logistics 9 (2): 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Timme, S.G. and Williams-Timme, C. (2003) The real cost of holding inventory. Supply Chain Management Review 7 (4): 30–37.Google Scholar
  41. Turner, H., Windle, R. and Dresner, M. (2004) North American containerport productivity: 1984–1997. Transportation Research Part E 40E (4): 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. U.S. MARAD Waterborne Databanks. (2005) U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C. CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  43. Van Hee, K.M., Huitink, B. and Leegwater, D.K. (1988) PORTPLAN: Decision support system for port terminals. European Journal of Operational Research 34 (3): 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Veness, C. (2008) Vincenty ‘Direct’ formula, http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong-vincenty-direct.html, accessed 20 September 2008.
  45. Wagschal, H.-H. (1985) New perspectives in decision support for port planning. Decision Support Systems 1 (4): 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jomon Aliyas Paul
    • 1
  • Michael J Maloni
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsFinance, & Quantitative Analysis, Kennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA
  2. 2.Department of Management & EntrepreneurshipKennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA

Personalised recommendations