Advertisement

Latino Studies

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 279–299 | Cite as

Disrupting the dream: Undocumented youth reframe citizenship and deportability through anti-deportation activism

  • Tania A Unzueta Carrasco
  • Hinda Seif
Original Article

Abstract

This essay analyzes how undocumented 1.5 generation activists respond to, disrupt and challenge state definitions of citizenship and belonging. The authors look at the work of the Immigrant Youth Justice League (IYJL), an immigrant rights group led by undocumented organizers in Chicago, with a focus on how they frame responses to federal deportation policies and deportations. This activism takes place in the context of a movement led by undocumented 1.5 generation youth whose tactics have included first-person testimony and civil disobedience. This is significant because they place the undocumented body at the forefront of the national dialog on immigration. Through interviews with members of the organization, analysis of first-hand documents and one author’s experience as an IYJL co-founder, we find that young undocumented activists increasingly fight for people who do not fit the nation-state’s parameters for accessing citizenship or relief from deportation. The state regulates access to citizenship, rights and deportation based on moral and hegemonic frameworks, systematic prejudices and socio-economic conditions. When young undocumented activists challenge these frames, they disrupt the power of the nation-state to make these determinations, and expand the debate about and boundaries of citizenship.

Keywords

undocumented deportation activism youth Chicago immigration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the members of the Immigrant Youth Justice League for allowing us into their process and space, as well as organizers from around the country who also have influenced and shaped the fight against deportations and for the rights of immigrants. In addition, we are grateful to the faculty at the University of Illinois at Chicago’s Latin American and Latino Studies Program for their unwavering support.

References

  1. Abrego, L. 2008. Legitimacy, Social Identity, and the Mobilization of Law: The Effects of Assembly Bill 540 on Undocumented Students in California. Law & Social Inquiry 33 (3): 709–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrego, L. 2011. Legal Consciousness of Undocumented Latinos: Fear and Stigma as Barriers to Claims-Making for First- and 1.5 Generation Immigrants. Law & Society Review 45 (2): 337–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker-Cristales, B. 2009. Mediated Resistance: The Construction of Neoliberal Citizenship in the Immigrant Rights Movement. Latino Studies 7 (1): 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosniak, L. 2006. The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castañeda, H. 2010. Deportation Deferred: Illegality, Visibility, and Recognition in Contemporary Germany. In The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement, eds. N. De Genova, and N. Peutz, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Coutin, S. 2000. Legalizing Moves: Salvadoran Immigrants’ Struggle for US Residency. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coutin, S. 2002. Questionable Transactions as Grounds for Legalization: Immigration, Illegality, and Law. Crime Law and Social Change 37 (1): 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coutin, S. 2005. Contesting Criminality: Illegal Immigration and the Spacialization of Legality. Theoretical Criminology 9 (1): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coutin, S. 2011. The Rights of Noncitizens in the United States. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7: 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Genova, N. 2002. Migrant “Illegality” and Deportability in Everyday Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Genova, N. and N. Peutz . 2010. The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Department of Homeland Security. 2012. FY 2012: ICE Announces Year-End Removal Numbers. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, http://www.ice.gov/news/releases/1212/121221washingtondc2.htm, accessed 23 March 2013.
  13. Dream Activist. 2012. Yanelli NEEDS Treatment, Not Deportation, http://action.dreamactivist.org/yanelli, accessed 11 January 2013.
  14. Foucault, M. 1975. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Paris, France: Gallimand Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Gonzales, R. 2008. Left Out but Not Shut Down: Political Activism and the Undocumented Student Movement. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy 3: 219–245.Google Scholar
  16. Gonzales, R. and L. Chavez . 2012. Awakening to a Nightmare: Abjectivity and Illegality in the Lives of Undocumented 1.5 generation Latino Immigrants in the United States. Current Anthropology 53 (3): 255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Immigrant Youth Justice League. 2013. Declaration of Independence from “Comprehensive Immigration Reform,” http://www.iyjl.org/immigrationstance/, accessed 12 August 2013.
  18. Jefferies, J. 2009. Do Undocumented Students “Play by the Rules?” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 52 (3): 249–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kanstroom, D. 2010. Deportation Nation: Outsiders in American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. López, M.P. 2006. The Intersection of Immigration Law and Civil Rights Law: Noncitizen Workers and the International Human Rights Paradigm. Brandeis Law Journal 44 (3): 611–635.Google Scholar
  21. Mendieta, E. 1999. Becoming Citizens, Becoming Hispanic. In The Good Citizen, eds. D. Batstone, and E. Mendieta, 113–132. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Morawetz, N. 2000. Understanding the Impact of the 1996 Deportation Laws and the Limited Scope of Proposed Reforms. Harvard Law Review 113 (8): 1936–1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morton, J. 2011. Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion Consistent with Civil Immigration Enforcement: Priorities for the Apprehension, Detention, and Removal of Aliens. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, http://www.ice.gov/doclib/secure-communities/pdf/prosecutorial-discretion-memo.pdf, accessed 10 November 2013.
  24. Napolitano, J. 2011. Letter from Janet Napolitano to Senators Harry Reid, Richard Durbin Washington DC: Office of the Secretary. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, http://issuu.com/metroweekly/docs/napolitano_letter#download, accessed 23 October 2013.
  25. Ngai, M. 2004. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Office of Senator Dick Durbin. 2011. Durbin, Reid, Menedez, 30 Others Introduce the DREAM Act, http://durbin.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/pressreleases?ID=fe132a1c-073d-4b99-94f1c61d25793c2f, accessed 23 March 2013.
  27. Pallares, A. 2010. Representing “La Familia”: Family Separation and Immigrant Activism In ¡Marcha! Latino Chicago and the Immigrant Rights Movement, eds. A. Pallares, and N. Flores-Gonzáles, 215–236. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  28. Peutz, N. and N. De Genova . 2010. Introduction. In The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement, eds. N. De Genova, and N. Peutz, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Seif, H. 2011. Unapologetic and Unafraid: Immigrant Youth Come Out from the Shadows. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 134: 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Unzueta Carrasco, I. 2010. Documents, Identities and Institutions. AREA Chicago #10: Institutions and Infrastructures, http://areachicago.org/documents-identities-and-institutions/, accessed 23 March 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tania A Unzueta Carrasco
    • 1
  • Hinda Seif
    • 2
  1. 1.Independent researcherWashington
  2. 2.University of IllinoisSpringfield

Personalised recommendations