Latino Studies

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 69–92 | Cite as

Re-conceptualizing the economic incorporation of immigrants: A comparison of the Mexican and Vietnamese

  • Shannon Gleeson
Original Article

Abstract

Using data from the 2000 5 per cent Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, this article advocates three shifts in our theoretical and empirical approaches to understanding immigrant economic incorporation. First, through a comparison of Mexican and Vietnamese immigrants, these findings highlight the importance of an immigrant population's relationship to the state for economic outcomes, and cautions against analyses that aggregate the foreign-born population. Second, through a joint analysis of unemployment and poverty outcomes, these findings call for researchers to be specific about the varied aspects of “economic incorporation” and distinguish between factors that drive labor market access, and those that foster material well-being. Lastly, by examining three state economic, demographic and policy variables, this article promotes an approach that takes human capital into account, while also heeding the immigrant context of reception.

Keywords

immigrant economic incorporation state policy documentation status 

References

  1. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). 2008. English Only. New York: “Lectric Law Library”. ACLU Briefing Paper.Google Scholar
  2. Aguilera, M.B. and D.S. Massey . 2003. Social Capital and the Wages of Mexican Migrants: New Hypotheses and Tests. Social Forces 82 (2): 671–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainsworth-Darnell, J.W. and D.B. Downey . 1998. Assessing the Oppositional Culture Explanation for Racial/Ethnic Differences in School Performance. American Sociological Review 63: 536–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alba, R.D. and V. Nee . 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aydemir, A. and M. Skuterud . 2005. Explaining the Deteriorating Entry Earnings of Canada's Immigrant Cohorts, 1966–2000. Canadian Journal of Economics 38 (2): 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batalova, J . 2008. Mexican Immigrants in the United States. In US in Focus. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute, www.migrationinofmrationsource.org/usFocus/display.cfm?id=679.Google Scholar
  7. Bean, F.D. and G. Stevens . 2003. America's Newcomers and the Dynamics of Diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Blau, F.D. and L.M. Kahn . 2005. Gender and Assimilation among Mexican Americans. NBER Working Paper W11512.Google Scholar
  9. Bloemraad, I . 2003. Institutions, Ethnic Leaders, and the Political Incorporation of Immigrants: A Comparison of Canada and the United States. In Host Societies and the Reception of Immigrants, ed. J.G. Reitz, San Diego, CA: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Bloemraad, I . 2006. Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the United States and Canada. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bonilla-Silva, E. and G. Baiocchi . 2001. Anything but Racism: How Sociologists Limit the Significance of Racism. Race and Society 4 (2): 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borjas, G . 2001. Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Borjas, G.J . 2002. Welfare Reform and Immigrant Participation in Welfare Programs. International Migration Review 36 (4): 1093–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Borjas, G.J. and M. Tienda . 1993. The Employment and Wages of Legalized Immigrants. International Migration Review 27 (4): 712–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bratsberg, B., J.F. Ragan Jr and Z.M. Nasir . 2002. The Effect of Naturalization on Wage Growth: A Panel Study of Young Male Immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics 20 (3): 568–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brezis, E.S. and P.R. Krugman . 1993. Immigration, Investment and Real Wages. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper W4563.Google Scholar
  17. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2008. Statewide Data Tables: Unemployment Rates for States (2000–2005). US Department of Labor, http://www.bls.gov/lau/#tables, accessed 25 January 2009.
  18. Capps, R, et al 2002. How are Immigrants Faring after Welfare Reform? Preliminary Evidence from Los Angeles and New York City. Washington DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Charney, E. and D.J. Hernandez . 1998. From Generation to Generation: The Health and Well-being of Children in Immigrant Families. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  20. Chiswick, B.R . 1978. The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-born Men. Journal of Political Economy 86 (5): 897–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chiswick, B.R., Y. Cohen and T. Zach . 1997. The Labor Market Status of Immigrants: Effects of the Unemployment Rate at Arrival and Duration of Residence. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 50: 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cortes, K.E . 2004. Are Refugees Different from Economic Immigrants? Some Empirical Evidence on the Heterogeneity of Immigrant Groups in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (2): 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duleep, H. and M. Regets . 1996. Admission Criteria and Immigrant Earnings Profiles. International Migration Review 30: 571–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Funkhouser, E . 2000. Convergence in Employment Rates of Immigrants. In Issues in the Economics of Immigration, ed. G.J. Borjas, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  25. Glick, J.E. and M.J. White . 2003. The Academic Trajectories of Immigrant Youths. Demography 40 (4): 759–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gordon, M.M . 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hardin, J.W . 1996. sg61: Bivariate Probit Models. Stata Technical Bulletin 33: 15–20.Google Scholar
  28. Hein, J . 1993. Refugees, Immigrants, and the State. Annual Reviews in Sociology 19 (1): 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hirschman, C., P. Kasinitz and J. DeWind, (eds.) 1999. The Handbook of International Migration: The American Experience. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  30. Hout, M., C. Brooks and J. Manza . 1995. The Democratic Class Struggle in the United States, 1948–1992. American Sociological Review 60: 805–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hu, W . 2000. Immigrant Earnings Assimilation: Estimates from Longitudinal Data. American Economic Review 90 (2): 368–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kesler, C . 2006. Social Policy and Immigrant Joblessness in Britain, Germany and Sweden. Social Forces 85 (2): 743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirschenman, J. and K.M. Neckerman . 1991. “We’d Love to Hire Them, But … ”: The Meaning of Race for Employers. In The Urban Underclass, eds. C. Jencks and P.E. Peterson, Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kossoudji, S.A . 1989. Immigrant Worker Assimilation: Is It a Labor Market Phenomenon? Journal of Human Resources 24 (3): 494–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kossoudji, S.A. and D.A. Cobb-Clark . 1996. Finding Good Opportunities within Unauthorized Markets: US Occupational Mobility for Male Latino Workers. The International Migration Review 30 (116): 901–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kwon, H., V.S. Suiker and J. Bauer . 2004. Factors Associated with the Poverty Status of Asian Immigrant Householders by Citizenship Status. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 25: 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Llull, J . 2008. The Impact of Immigration on Productivity. Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros (CEMFI) Working Paper 0802.Google Scholar
  38. Lucas, S.R., P.N. Fucella and M. Berends . 2001. Neo-classical Education Transitions Analyses of Boomers and Post-boomers: A Corrected Tale for Three Cohorts. Paper presented at International Sociological Association, Research Committee Number 28. Montréal, Quebec, August 2007.Google Scholar
  39. Malone, N.J., K.F. Baluka, J.M. Costanzo and C.J. Davis . 2003. The Foreign Born Population, 2000. Washington DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  40. Mattoo, A., C. Ozden and I.C. Neagu . 2008. Brain Waste? Educated Immigrants in the US Labor Market. Journal of Development Economics 87 (2): 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Murthy, H.M . 2007. Cities, Citizenship and Undocumented Aliens: Dilemmas of Law and Political Community in Contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California. Institute for the Study of Social Change Fellows Working Papers, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/57m2g81r.
  42. National Council of State Legislatures (NCSL). 2008. 2007 Enacted State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration. In Immigrant Policy Project. Washington DC: National Council of State Legislatures, http://www.ncsl.org/portals/1/documents/immig/2007immigrationfinal.pdf.
  43. Newland, K., H. Tanaka and L. Barker . 2007. Bridging Divides: The Role of Ethnic Community-based Organizations in Refugee Integration. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  44. O'Donnell, K. and J. Batalova . 2007. Spotlight on Refugees and Asylees in the United States. In US in Focus. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute, http://www.migrationinformation.org/usfocus/display.cfm?id=664.Google Scholar
  45. Ogbu, J.U . 2008. Minority Status, Oppositional Culture and Schooling, Sociocultural, Political, and Historical Studies in Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Passel, J . 2004. Mexican Immigration to the US: The Latest Estimates. In Feature Story. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  47. Passel, J.S . 2006. Size and Characteristics of the Unauthorized Migrant Population in the US. Washington DC: Pew Hispanic Center, http://pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?ReportID=61.Google Scholar
  48. Pedraza, S . 1991. Women and Migration: The Social Consequences of Gender. Annual Reviews in Sociology 17 (1): 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Petersen, T . 2002. Functional Form for Continuous Dependent Variables: Raw Versus Logged Form. Unpublished Manuscript, Berkeley, CA: Department of Sociology, University of California.Google Scholar
  50. Phillips, J.A. and D.S. Massey . 1999. The New Labor Market: Immigrants and Wages after IRCA. Demography 36 (2): 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poirier, D . 1980. Partial Observability in Bivariate Probit Models. Journal of Econometrics 12: 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Portes, A. and A. Stepick . 1985. Unwelcome Immigrants: The Labor Market Experiences of 1980 (Mariel) Cuban and Haitian Refugees in South Florida. American Sociological Review 50 (4): 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Portes, A. and M. Zhou . 1993. The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530 (November): 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Portes, A. and M. Zhou . 1996. Self-employment and the Earnings of Immigrants. American Sociological Review 61 (2): 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Proctor, B.D. and J. Dalaker . 2003. Poverty in the United States: 2002. Washington DC: US Department of Commerce, Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  56. Raijman, R. and M. Tienda . 1999. Immigrants’ Socioeconomic Progress Post-1965: Forging Mobility or Survival? In The Handbook of International Migration: The American Experience, eds. C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz and J. DeWind, New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  57. Reitz, J.G . 1998. Warmth of the Welcome: The Social Causes of Economic Success for Immigrants in Different Nations and Cities. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rodriguez, C., M. Chishti and K. Nortman . 2007. Testing the Limits: A Framework for Assessing the Legality of State and Local Immigration Measures. In National Center on Immigrant Integration Policy. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute, http://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/NCIIP_Assessing%20the%20Legality%20of%20state%20and%20Local%20immigration%20Measures121307.pdf.Google Scholar
  59. Sanders, J.M. and V. Nee . 1987. Limits of Ethnic Solidarity in the Enclave Economy. American Sociological Review 52 (6): 745–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Summers, L.H . 2007. Unemployment. In The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, ed. D.R. Henderson, Indianapolis, IN: Library of Economics and Liberty.Google Scholar
  61. Terrazas, A . 2008. Vietnamese Immigrants in the United States. In US in Focus. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute, http://www.migrationinformation.org/usfocus/display.cfm?ID=197.Google Scholar
  62. Tienda, M. and A. Singer . 1995. Wage Mobility of Undocumented Workers in the United States. International Migration Review 29 (1): 112–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trejo, S.J . 1997. Why Do Mexican Americans Earn Low Wages? Journal of Political Economy 105 (6): 1235–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. US Census Bureau. 2008. Foreign-Born Profiles (STP-159): Population Division, Washington, D.C., http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/foreign/STP-159-200tl.html.
  65. Van Hook, J. and K.S. Balistreri . 2002. Diversity and Change in the Institutional Context of Immigrant Adaptation: California Schools 1985–2000. Demography 39 (4): 639–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Van Tubergen, F., I. Maas and H. Flap . 2004. The Economic Incorporation of Immigrants in 18 Western Societies: Origin, Destination, and Community Effects. American Sociological Review 69 (5): 704–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Waldinger, R.D. and M.I. Lichter . 2003. How the Other Half Works: Immigration and the Social Organization of Labor. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  68. Zavodny, M . 2000. The Effects of Official English Laws on Limited-English-Proficient Workers. Journal of Labor Economics 18 (3): 427–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zimmerman, W. and K.C. Tumlin . 1999. Patchwork Policies: State Assistance for Immigrants under Welfare Reform. In Assessing the New Federalism. Washington DC: The Urban Institute, http://www.urban.org/publications/309007.html.Google Scholar
  70. Zuberi, D . 2006. Differences That Matter: Social Policy and the Working Poor in the United States and Canada. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shannon Gleeson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSanta Cruz

Personalised recommendations