Re-conceptualizing the economic incorporation of immigrants: A comparison of the Mexican and Vietnamese
Using data from the 2000 5 per cent Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, this article advocates three shifts in our theoretical and empirical approaches to understanding immigrant economic incorporation. First, through a comparison of Mexican and Vietnamese immigrants, these findings highlight the importance of an immigrant population's relationship to the state for economic outcomes, and cautions against analyses that aggregate the foreign-born population. Second, through a joint analysis of unemployment and poverty outcomes, these findings call for researchers to be specific about the varied aspects of “economic incorporation” and distinguish between factors that drive labor market access, and those that foster material well-being. Lastly, by examining three state economic, demographic and policy variables, this article promotes an approach that takes human capital into account, while also heeding the immigrant context of reception.
Keywordsimmigrant economic incorporation state policy documentation status
- American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). 2008. English Only. New York: “Lectric Law Library”. ACLU Briefing Paper.Google Scholar
- Batalova, J . 2008. Mexican Immigrants in the United States. In US in Focus. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute, www.migrationinofmrationsource.org/usFocus/display.cfm?id=679.Google Scholar
- Bean, F.D. and G. Stevens . 2003. America's Newcomers and the Dynamics of Diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Blau, F.D. and L.M. Kahn . 2005. Gender and Assimilation among Mexican Americans. NBER Working Paper W11512.Google Scholar
- Bloemraad, I . 2003. Institutions, Ethnic Leaders, and the Political Incorporation of Immigrants: A Comparison of Canada and the United States. In Host Societies and the Reception of Immigrants, ed. J.G. Reitz, San Diego, CA: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies.Google Scholar
- Bloemraad, I . 2006. Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the United States and Canada. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Borjas, G . 2001. Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Brezis, E.S. and P.R. Krugman . 1993. Immigration, Investment and Real Wages. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper W4563.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2008. Statewide Data Tables: Unemployment Rates for States (2000–2005). US Department of Labor, http://www.bls.gov/lau/#tables, accessed 25 January 2009.
- Capps, R, et al 2002. How are Immigrants Faring after Welfare Reform? Preliminary Evidence from Los Angeles and New York City. Washington DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
- Charney, E. and D.J. Hernandez . 1998. From Generation to Generation: The Health and Well-being of Children in Immigrant Families. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Funkhouser, E . 2000. Convergence in Employment Rates of Immigrants. In Issues in the Economics of Immigration, ed. G.J. Borjas, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Gordon, M.M . 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hardin, J.W . 1996. sg61: Bivariate Probit Models. Stata Technical Bulletin 33: 15–20.Google Scholar
- Hirschman, C., P. Kasinitz and J. DeWind, (eds.) 1999. The Handbook of International Migration: The American Experience. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Kirschenman, J. and K.M. Neckerman . 1991. “We’d Love to Hire Them, But … ”: The Meaning of Race for Employers. In The Urban Underclass, eds. C. Jencks and P.E. Peterson, Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Llull, J . 2008. The Impact of Immigration on Productivity. Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros (CEMFI) Working Paper 0802.Google Scholar
- Lucas, S.R., P.N. Fucella and M. Berends . 2001. Neo-classical Education Transitions Analyses of Boomers and Post-boomers: A Corrected Tale for Three Cohorts. Paper presented at International Sociological Association, Research Committee Number 28. Montréal, Quebec, August 2007.Google Scholar
- Malone, N.J., K.F. Baluka, J.M. Costanzo and C.J. Davis . 2003. The Foreign Born Population, 2000. Washington DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- Murthy, H.M . 2007. Cities, Citizenship and Undocumented Aliens: Dilemmas of Law and Political Community in Contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California. Institute for the Study of Social Change Fellows Working Papers, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/57m2g81r.
- National Council of State Legislatures (NCSL). 2008. 2007 Enacted State Legislation Related to Immigrants and Immigration. In Immigrant Policy Project. Washington DC: National Council of State Legislatures, http://www.ncsl.org/portals/1/documents/immig/2007immigrationfinal.pdf.
- Newland, K., H. Tanaka and L. Barker . 2007. Bridging Divides: The Role of Ethnic Community-based Organizations in Refugee Integration. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
- O'Donnell, K. and J. Batalova . 2007. Spotlight on Refugees and Asylees in the United States. In US in Focus. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute, http://www.migrationinformation.org/usfocus/display.cfm?id=664.Google Scholar
- Ogbu, J.U . 2008. Minority Status, Oppositional Culture and Schooling, Sociocultural, Political, and Historical Studies in Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Passel, J . 2004. Mexican Immigration to the US: The Latest Estimates. In Feature Story. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
- Passel, J.S . 2006. Size and Characteristics of the Unauthorized Migrant Population in the US. Washington DC: Pew Hispanic Center, http://pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?ReportID=61.Google Scholar
- Petersen, T . 2002. Functional Form for Continuous Dependent Variables: Raw Versus Logged Form. Unpublished Manuscript, Berkeley, CA: Department of Sociology, University of California.Google Scholar
- Proctor, B.D. and J. Dalaker . 2003. Poverty in the United States: 2002. Washington DC: US Department of Commerce, Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- Raijman, R. and M. Tienda . 1999. Immigrants’ Socioeconomic Progress Post-1965: Forging Mobility or Survival? In The Handbook of International Migration: The American Experience, eds. C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz and J. DeWind, New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Reitz, J.G . 1998. Warmth of the Welcome: The Social Causes of Economic Success for Immigrants in Different Nations and Cities. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, C., M. Chishti and K. Nortman . 2007. Testing the Limits: A Framework for Assessing the Legality of State and Local Immigration Measures. In National Center on Immigrant Integration Policy. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute, http://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/NCIIP_Assessing%20the%20Legality%20of%20state%20and%20Local%20immigration%20Measures121307.pdf.Google Scholar
- Summers, L.H . 2007. Unemployment. In The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, ed. D.R. Henderson, Indianapolis, IN: Library of Economics and Liberty.Google Scholar
- Terrazas, A . 2008. Vietnamese Immigrants in the United States. In US in Focus. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute, http://www.migrationinformation.org/usfocus/display.cfm?ID=197.Google Scholar
- US Census Bureau. 2008. Foreign-Born Profiles (STP-159): Population Division, Washington, D.C., http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/foreign/STP-159-200tl.html.
- Waldinger, R.D. and M.I. Lichter . 2003. How the Other Half Works: Immigration and the Social Organization of Labor. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Zuberi, D . 2006. Differences That Matter: Social Policy and the Working Poor in the United States and Canada. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar