Knowledge Management Research & Practice

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 261–275 | Cite as

Green intellectual capital and environmental product innovation: the mediating role of green social capital

  • Miriam Delgado-Verde
  • Javier Amores-Salvadó
  • Gregorio Martín-de Castro
  • José Emilio Navas-López
Article

Abstract

Although the importance of intellectual capital has already been highlighted in the management literature, few articles have focused on the importance of its green counterpart, green intellectual capital. Nowadays, when environmental concerns cannot be ignored by firms, it is therefore time to explore the role of green intellectual capital in environmental improvement. For that reason, our research aims to explore the relationships between green intellectual capital components and the environmental performance of the firms. In particular, we try to show the importance of green organizational and social capital in the development of environmental product innovations, which are vital to the development and implementation of environmental strategies since, as scholars have pointed out, they generate some of the greatest environmental impacts. The empirical results show that green organizational capital has an indirect impact on environmental product innovation through green social capital, meaning that the latter is a significant mediator of that relationship, and at the same time emphasizing that informal relationships play a key role in the improvement of the environmental performance of the firm and, more specifically, in the development of environmental product innovations.

Keywords

green intellectual capital green organizational capital green social capital environmental product innovation 

References

  1. Aiman-Smith L, Goodrich N, Roberts D and Scinta J (2005) Assessing your organization’s potential for value innovation. Research-Technology Management 48 (2), 37–42.Google Scholar
  2. Akgün AE, Keskin H, Byrne JC and Aren S (2007) Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance. Technovation 27 (9), 501–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aragón-Correa JA and Sharma S (2003) A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review 28 (1), 71–78.Google Scholar
  4. Aragón-Correa JA, Garcia-Morales VJ and Cordón-Pozo E (2007) Leadership and organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management 36 (3), 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aragón-Correa JA, Hurtado-Torres N, Sharma S and García-Morales VJ (2008) Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management 86 (1), 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armstrong JS and Overton TS (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3), 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arundel A and Kemp R (2009) Measuring Eco-Innovation. Working Paper 2009–017. United Nations University, Maastricht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  8. Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barney JB (2001) Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review 26 (1), 41–56.Google Scholar
  10. Blanco E, Rey Maqueira J and Lozano J (2009) The economic impacts of voluntary environmental performance of firms: a critical review. Journal of Economic Surveys 23 (3), 462–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boiral O (2002) Tacit knowledge and environmental management. Long Range Planning 35 (3), 291–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bontis N (1998) Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision 36 (2), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boxman EAW, De Graaf PM and Flap HD (1991) The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers. Social Networks 13 (1), 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brehm J and Rahn W (1997) Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41 (3), 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brío JA, Fernández E and Junquera B (2007) Management and employee involvement in achieving an environmental action-based competitive advantage: an empirical study. International Journal of Human Resource Management 18 (4), 491–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bunge J, Cohen-Rosenthal E and Ruiz-Quintanilla A (1995) Report from the Cornell work and environmental initiative and the Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  17. Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Chang C-H (2011) The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: the mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (3), 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chang C-H and Chen Y-S (2012) The determinants of green intellectual capital. Management Decision 50 (1), 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen Y-S (2008a) The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics 77 (3), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen Y-S (2008b) The driver of green innovation and green image – green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3), 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen Y-S (2011) Green organizational identity: sources and consequence. Management Decision 49 (3), 384–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen M, Chang Y and Hung S (2008) Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R & D Management 38 (1), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen YS, Lai SB and Wen CT (2006) The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (4), 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Christmann P (2000) Effects of ‘best practices’ of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal 43 (4), 663–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Claver-Cortés E, López-Gamero MD, Molina-Azorín JF and Zaragoza-Sáez P (2007) Intellectual and environmental capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital 8 (1), 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Claver-Cortés E, Pertusa-Ortega EM and Molina-Azorín JF (2011) Estructura organizativa y resultado empresarial: un análisis empírico del papel mediador de la estrategia. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 14 (1), 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cleff T and Rennings K (1999) Determinants of environmental product and process innovation. European Environment 9 (5), 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cohen W and Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Conca FJ, Llopis J and Tarí JJ (2004) Development of a measure to assess quality management in certified firms. European Journal of Operational Research 156 (3), 683–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Daily BF and Huang SC (2001) Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 21 (12), 1539–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dangelico RM and Pujari D (2010) Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Danneels E (2002) The dynamics of product innovation and competences. Strategic Management Journal 23 (12), 1095–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dahlström K and Ekins P (2006) Combining economic and environmental dimensions: value chain analysis of UK iron and steel flows. Ecological Economics 58 (3), 507–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Darnall N (2006) Why firms mandate ISO 14001 certification. Business & Society 45 (3), 354–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Darnall N and Edwards D (2008) Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: the role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal 27 (4), 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Darnall N, Henriques I and Sadorsky P (2008) Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? Journal of International Management 14 (4), 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dean A and Kretschmer M (2007) Can ideas be capital? Factors of production in the postindustrial economy: a review and critique. Academy of Management Review 32 (2), 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Delmas M (2001) Stakeholders and competitive advantage: the case for ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management 10 (3), 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Delmas M, Hoffmann VH and Kuss M (2011) Under the tip of the iceberg: absorptive capacity, environmental strategy, and competitive advantage. Business and Society 50 (1), 116–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Demirel P and Kesidou E (2011) Stimulating different types of eco-innovation in the UK: government policies and firm motivations. Ecological Economics 70 (8), 1546–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Denison DR and Mishra AK (1995) Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organizational Science 6 (2), 204–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Diamantopoulos A and Winklhofer H (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2), 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Drucker P (2007) The Practice of Management. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.Google Scholar
  45. Edvinsson L and Sullivan P (1996) Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European Management Journal 14 (4), 356–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fernández E, Junquera B and Ortiz M (2003) Organizational culture and human resources in the environmental issue: a review of the literature. International Journal of Human Resource Management 14 (4), 634–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Field A (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  48. Fiksel J (2001) Design for the Environment: Creating Eco-efficient Products and Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Florida R (1996) Lean and green: the move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. California Management Review 39 (1), 80–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. González-Benito J and González-Benito O (2005) A study of the motivations for the environmental transformation of companies. Industrial Marketing Management 34 (5), 462–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. González-Benito J and González-Benito O (2008) Operations management practices linked to the adoption of ISO 14001: an empirical analysis of Spanish manufacturers. International Journal of Production Economics 113 (1), 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL and Black WC (2004) Análisis Multivariante. quinta edición, Pearson Prentice Hall, Madrid.Google Scholar
  54. Hanna MD, Newman WR and Johnson P (2000) Linking operational and environmental improvement through employee involvement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20 (2), 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hart S (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20 (4), 986–1014.Google Scholar
  56. Hart SL and Ahuja G. (1996) Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 5 (1), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hart SL and Dowell G (2011) A natural-resource-based view of the firm: fifteen years after. Journal of Management 37 (5), 1464–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hatch MJ (1993) The dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review 18 (4), 657–693.Google Scholar
  59. Hatch MJ and Schultz M (2002) The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations 55 (8), 989–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Horbach J (2008) Determinants of environmental innovation – new evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy 37 (1), 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Huang CL and Kung FH (2011) Environmental consciousness and intellectual capital management. Management Decision 49 (9), 1405–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Huang JW and Li YH (2009) The mediating effect of knowledge management on social interaction and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower 30 (3), 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Inglehart R (1997) Modernization and Post-modernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  64. Kammerer D (2009) The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation. Empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany. Ecological Economics 68 (8–9), 2285–2295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. King AA and Lenox MJ (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science 48 (2), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kitazawa S and Sarkis J (2000) The relationship between ISO 14001 and continuous source reduction programs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20 (2), 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Klassen RD and Whybark CD (1999) The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal 42 (6), 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lenox M, King A and Ehrenfeld J (2000) An assessment of design-for-environment practices in leading US electronic firms. Interfaces 30 (3), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lönnqvist A, Sillanpää V and Carlucci D (2009) Intellectual capital management in practice: assessment of implementation and outcomes. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 7 (4), 308–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. López-Gamero MD, Molina-Azorín JF and Claver-Cortés E (2010) The potential of environmental regulation to change managerial perception, environmental management, competitiveness and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (10–11), 963–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. López-Gamero MD, Zaragoza-Sáez P, Claver-Cortés E and Molina-Azorín JF (2011) Sustainable development and intangibles: building sustainable intellectual capital. Business Strategy and the Environment 20 (1), 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Malhotra NK, Kim SS and Patil A (2006) Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science 52 (12), 1865–1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Martín-De Castro G, Delgado-Verde M, López-Saez P and Navas-López JE (2010) Towards ‘an intellectual capital-based view of the firm’: origins and nature. Journal of Business Ethics 98 (4), 649–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Martín-De Castro G, Delgado-Verde M, Navas-López JE and Cruz-González J (2013) The moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between knowledge assets and product innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 80 (2), 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Melnyk S, Sroufe S and Calantone R (2003) Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management 21 (3), 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Moran P (2005) Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal 26 (12), 1129–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Moustaghfir K (2009) How knowledge assets lead to a sustainable competitive advantage: are organizational capabilities a missing link? Knowledge Management Research & Practice 7 (4), 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nahapiet J and Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 (2), 242–266.Google Scholar
  79. Nehrt C (1998) Maintainability of first mover advantages when environmental regulations differ between countries. Academy of Management Review 23 (1), 77–97.Google Scholar
  80. Newbert S (2008) Value, rareness, competitive advantage and performance: a conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 29 (7), 745–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. O’Fallon MJ and Butterfield KD (2012) The influence of unethical peer behavior on observers’ unethical behavior: a social cognitive perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14 (3), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Podsakoff NP and Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organization research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12 (4), 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pujari D (2006) Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation 26 (1), 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pujari D, Peattie K and Wright G (2004) Organizational antecedents of environmental responsiveness in industrial new product development. Industrial Marketing Management 33 (5), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Putnam RD (1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6 (1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Reed KK, Lubatkin M and Srinivasan N (2006) Proposing and testing an intellectual capital-based view of the firm. Journal of Management Studies 43 (4), 867–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rehfeld KM, Rennings K and Ziegler A (2007) Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: an empirical analysis. Ecological Economics 61 (1), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rennings K and Zwick T (2002) Employment impact of cleaner production on the firm level: empirical evidence from a survey in five European countries. International Journal of Innovation Management 6 (3), 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rennings K, Ziegler A, Ankele K and Hoffman E (2006) The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics 57 (1), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rugman AM and Verbeke A (1998) Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal 19 (4), 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Russo MV and Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3), 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rodan S and Galunic C (2004) More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal 25 (6), 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Salman N and Saives A (2005) Indirect networks: an intangible resource for biotechnology innovation. R & D Management 35 (2), 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Shang SSC and Lin S (2010) A model of intellectual capital management capability in the dynamic business environment. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 8 (1), 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sharma S and Aragón-Correa JA (2005) Corporate Environmental Strategy and Competitive Advantage. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.; North Hampton, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sharma S and Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19 (8), 729–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Smith K (2005) Measuring innovation. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Mowery DC, Nelson RR and Faberger J (Eds)), Oxford University Press, Oxford pp. 148–177.Google Scholar
  99. Song WH (1995) Green Management Manual. Commonwealth Publishing, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  100. Subramaniam M and Youndt MA (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48 (3), 450–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tien SW, Chung YC and Tsai CH (2005) An empirical study on the correlation between environmental design implementation and business competitive advantages in Taiwan’s industries. Technovation 25 (7), 783–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Triebswetter U and Wackerbauer J (2008) Integrated environmental product innovation in the region of Munich and its impact on company competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (14), 1484–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Un CA and Cuervo-Cazurra A (2004) Strategies for knowledge creation in firms. British Journal of Management 15 (S1), S27–S41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wagner M (2007) On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: evidence from German manufacturing firms. Research Policy 36 (10), 1587–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wagner M (2009) Innovation and competitive advantages from the integration of strategic aspects with social and environmental management in European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment 18 (5), 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wagner M (2010) The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: a firm level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics 69 (7), 1553–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5 (2), 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Woolcock M (1998) Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society 27 (2), 151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wu W, Chang M and Chen C (2008) Promoting innovation through the accumulation of intellectual capital, social capital, and entrepreneurial orientation. R & D Management 38 (3), 265–277.Google Scholar
  110. Zárraga C and Bonache J (2005) The impact of team atmosphere on knowledge outcomes in self-managed teams. Organization Studies 26 (5), 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Ziegler A and Nogareda J (2009) Environmental management systems and technological environmental innovations: exploring the causal relationship. Research Policy 38 (5), 885–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Ziegler A, Rennings K and Türpitz K (2004) Determinants of environmental innovations in Germany: DO organizational measures matter? A discrete choice analysis at the firm level. ZEW Discussion Paper, 4–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miriam Delgado-Verde
    • 1
  • Javier Amores-Salvadó
    • 1
  • Gregorio Martín-de Castro
    • 1
  • José Emilio Navas-López
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Organización de Empresas, Universidad Complutense de MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations