Knowledge Management Research & Practice

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 123–132 | Cite as

Linking human, technological, and relational assets to technological innovation: exploring a new approach

  • Gregorio Martín-de Castro
  • Miriam Delgado-Verde
  • Javier Amores-Salvadó
  • José Emilio Navas-López
Article

Abstract

In a knowledge-based economy, firms' technological innovations represent one of the best ways in order to survive and to achieve firm success. Nonaka and Takeuchi stated that technological innovation is close to firms' intellectual or knowledge asset management, and additional efforts are needed to understand these complex causal relationships. If we can assume that technological innovation causation rarely has a single cause, and that these causes rarely operate in isolation from each other, empirical research needs a new configurational perspective, where the integrity of firms' technological innovations as complex configurations of causal factors are preserved. This way, using a configurational approach, and primary data of 251 technology-based firms based in Spain, this paper explores firms' human, technological, and relational assets configurations and product innovations.

Keywords

intellectual capital technological innovation knowledge assets 

References

  1. Adler PS and Kwon S (2002) Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 9 (1), 17–40.Google Scholar
  2. Akgün A, Keskin H, Byrne J and Aren S (2007) Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance. Technovation, 27 (9), 501–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney JB, Ketchen D and Wright M (2011) The future of resource-based theory: revitalization or decline? Journal of Management 37 (5), 1299–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Bentrani U, Kleinschmindt E and Salomo S (2010) Success in global new product development: impact of strategy and the behavioral environment of the firm. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27 (2), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bontis N (1996) There's a price on your head: managing intellectual capital strategically. Business Quarterly 60 (Summer), 41–47.Google Scholar
  7. Brooking A (1996) Intellectual Capital. Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise. International Thomson Business Press, London.Google Scholar
  8. Bueno E, Aragón AA, Salmador MP and Garcia V (2010) Tangible slack versus intangible resources: the influence of technology slack and tacit knowledge on the capability of organisational learning to generate innovation and performance. International Journal of Technology Management 49 (10), 314–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabrita MR and Bontis N (2008) Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry. International Journal of Technology Management 43 (1/2/3), 212–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen J, Zhu Z and Xie HY (2004) Measuring intellectual capital: a new model and empirical study. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5 (1), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chesbrough HW (2003) The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  12. CIC (2003) Modelo de Medición y Gestión del Capital Intelectual, Modelo Intellectus. CIC-IADE, Madrid.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen W and Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coombs JE and Bierly PE (2006) Measuring technological capability and performance. R&D Management 36 (4), 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corso M, Martini A, Pellegrini L and Paolucci E (2003) Knowledge management configurations in Italian small-to-medium enterprises. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 14 (2), 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crilly D (2011) Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory. Journal of International Business Studies 42 (9), 694–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dean A and Kretschmer M (2007) Can ideas be capital? Factors of production in the postindustrial economy: a review and critique. Academy of Management Review 32 (2), 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Díaz-Díaz N, Aguiar-Díaz I and De Saá-Pérez P (2008) The effect of technological knowledge assets on performance: the innovation choice in Spanish firms. Research Policy 37 (9), 1515–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edvinsson L and Malone M (1997) Intellectual Capital: Realizing your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower. HarperCollins, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Escribano A, Fosfuri A and Tribó JA (2009) Managing external knowledge flows: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy 38 (1), 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal 54 (2), 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Galende J (2006) Analysis of technological innovation from business economics and management. Technovation 26 (3), 300–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greckhamer T, Misangyi VF, Elms H and Lacey R (2008) Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: an examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects. Organizational Research Methods 11 (4), 695–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greve HR (2003) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal 46 (6), 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gruber M, Heinemann F, Brettel M and Hungeling S (2010) Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: an exploratory study on technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal 31 (12), 1337–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hill CW and Rothaermel FT (2003) The Performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review 28 (2), 257–274.Google Scholar
  28. Hsu YH and Fang W (2009) Intellectual capital and new product development performance: the mediating role of organizational learning capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (5), 664–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson LD, Neave EH and Pazderka B (2002) Knowledge, innovation and share value. International Journal of Management Reviews 4 (2), 101–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kang SC and Snell SA (2009) Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: a framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies 46 (1), 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaplan RS and Norton DP (1992) The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70 (1), 71–79.Google Scholar
  32. King AW and Zeithaml CP (2003) Measuring organizational knowledge: a conceptual and methodological framework. Strategic Management Journal 24 (8), 763–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kraaijenbrink J, Spender JC and Groen AJ (2010) The resource-based view: a review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management 36 (1), 349–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leitner K (2005) Managing and reporting intangible assets in research technology organisations. R&D Management 35 (2), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lettl C (2007) User involvement competence for radical innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 24 (1/2), 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu PL, Chen WC and Tsai CH (2005) An empirical study on the correlation between the knowledge management method and new product development strategy on product performance in Taiwan's industries. Technovation 25 (6), 637–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mansury MA and Love JH (2008) Innovation, productivity and growth in U.S. business services: a firm-level analysis. Technovation 28 (1), 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martín-de Castro G, Delgado-Verde M, López-Sáez P and Navas-López JE (2011) Towards ‘An intellectual capital-based view of the firm’: origins and nature. Journal of Business Ethics 98 (4), 649–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martínez-Torres A (2006) Procedure to design a structural and measurement model of intellectual capital: an exploratory study. Information & Management 43 (5), 617–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morris SS and Snell SA (2011) Intellectual capital configurations and organizational capability: an empirical examination of human resource subunits in the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies 42 (6), 805–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newbert SL (2007) Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal 28 (2), 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Newbert SL (2008) Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual-level empirical investigation of the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 29 (7), 745–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nieto M (2001) Bases para el estudio del proceso de innovación tecnológica en la empresa. Universidad de León, Spain.Google Scholar
  44. Nieto M and Quevedo P (2005) Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation 25 (10), 1141–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Ragin C (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  47. Ragin C (2008) Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In Configurational Comparative Analysis (Benoit R and Charles R, Eds), pp 87–121, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA and London.Google Scholar
  48. Reed KK, Lubatkin M and Srinivasan N (2006) Proposing and testing an intellectual capital-based view of the firm. Journal of Management Studies 43 (4), 867–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rouse M and Daellenbach U (1999) Rethinking research methods for the resource-based perspective: isolating sources of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 20 (5), 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sánchez-González G, González-Álvarez N and Nieto M (2009) Sticky information and heterogeneous needs as determining factors of R&D cooperation with customers. Research Policy 38 (10), 1590–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schneider MR, Schulze-Bentrop C and Paunescu M (2011) Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: a fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies 41 (2), 246–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Snell SA and Dean JW (1992) Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: a human capital perspective. Academy of Management Journal 35 (3), 467–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Souitaris V (2002) Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation. Research Policy 31 (6), 877–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stieglitz N and Heine K (2007) Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 28 (1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stewart T (1991) Brainpower. Fortune 123 (June), 44–50.Google Scholar
  56. Subramaniam M and Youndt MA (2005) The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48 (3), 450–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal 44 (5), 996–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tseng C and Goo YJ (2005) Intellectual capital and corporate value in an emerging economy: empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturers. R&D Management 35 (2), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tushman M and Nadler D (1986) Organizing for innovation. California Management Review 28 (3), 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wincent J, Anokhin S and Örtqvist D (2010) Does network board capital matter? a study of innovative performance in strategic SME networks. Journal of Business Research 63 (3), 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wu W, Chang M and Chen C (2008) Promoting innovation through the accumulation of intellectual capital, social capital, and entrepreneurial orientation. R&D Management 38 (3), 265–277.Google Scholar
  62. Zahra S and George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27 (2), 185–203.Google Scholar
  63. Zárraga C and Bonache J (2005) The impact of team atmosphere on knowledge outcomes in self-managed teams. Organization Studies 26 (5), 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhou KZ and Li CB (2012) How knowledge affects radical innovation: knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal 33 (9), 1090–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregorio Martín-de Castro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Miriam Delgado-Verde
    • 1
    • 2
  • Javier Amores-Salvadó
    • 1
    • 2
  • José Emilio Navas-López
    • 1
  1. 1.Complutense University of MadridSpain
  2. 2.Nonaka CentreCUNEF

Personalised recommendations