Knowledge Management Research & Practice

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 361–381 | Cite as

Explaining organizational knowledge creation with a knowledge maturing model



Social media challenge knowledge management because of encouraging conversations, networking and participation in more distributed, diverse and dynamic ways of knowledge development and increasingly important individuals’ interests driving them. Hence, we need to understand the complex relationships between different qualities of knowledge developed in informal and formal processes as well as for overcoming misalignments in routines, tools and infrastructures supporting organizational knowledge creation. This paper contributes a maturation perspective towards explaining organizational knowledge creation and presents a knowledge maturing model, which is grounded in organizational practice and validated with qualitative and quantitative empirical and design studies. The results describe how characteristics of knowledge and support by IT change between phases of knowledge maturing. Our findings confirm theories of organizational knowledge creation with respect to expanding scopes from individuals through communities to organizations moving from interest-driven knowledge exploration in informal contexts to goal-driven knowledge exploitation in formal contexts. The maturation perspective adds to our understanding that organizational knowledge creation is not simply a continuous process. Phases that emphasize changeability alternate with phases concerned with stability. Knowledge develops in contexts that need to switch multiple times between opening up for new knowledge and filtering relevant knowledge and between de- and re-contextualization.


Design empirical study knowledge development knowledge management theory social media socio-technical system 


  1. Alavi M and Leidner DE (2001) Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. Management Information Systems Quarterly 25 (1), 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida P and Phene A (2004) Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal 25 (8–9), 847–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amar DA and Juneja J (2008) A descriptive model of innovation and creativity in organizations: a synthesis of research and practice. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 6 (4), 298–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amidon DM (1998) The evolving community of knowledge practice: the Ken awakening. International Journal of Technology Management 16 (2–3), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong A and Hagel III J (1995) Real profits from virtual communities. McKinsey Quarterly 32 (3), 127–141.Google Scholar
  6. Barab SA and Squire KD (2004) Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 (1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boisot MH (1995) Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organisations, Institutions and Cultures. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  8. Borzillo S and Kaminska-Labbé R (2011) Unravelling the dynamics of knowledge creation in communities of practice through complexity theory lenses. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 9 (4), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braun S, Kunzmann C and Schmidt A (2010) People tagging & ontology maturing: towards collaborative competence management. In From CSCW to Web 2.0: European Developments in Collaborative Design. Selected Papers from COOP08 (Randall D and Salembier P, Eds) pp 133–154, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braun S, Kunzmann C and Schmidt A (2012) Semantic people tagging & ontology maturing: an enterprise social media approach to competence management. International Journal on Knowledge and Learning 8 (1/2), 86–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braun S, Zacharias V and Happel H (2008) Social semantic bookmarking. In Proceedings of the Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management (Yamaguchi T, Ed) LNCS, Vol. 5345, Springer, Berlin, pp 62–73.Google Scholar
  12. Bryman A and Bell E (2007) Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell DT (1974) Evolutionary epistemology. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper (Schilpp PA, Ed), pp 413–463, Open Court, La Salle, IL.Google Scholar
  14. Cha M, Kwak H, Rodriguez P, Ahn Y-Y and Moon S (2007) I Tube, You Tube, Everybody Tubes: Analyzing the world’s largest user generated content video system. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), San Diego, CA, October.Google Scholar
  15. Cockburn A and Highsmith J (2001) Agile software development: the people factor. IEEE Computer 34 (11), 131–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coombs R and Hull R (1998) ‘Knowledge management practices’ and path-dependency in innovation. Research Policy 27 (3), 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cress U and Kimmerle J (2008) A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3 (2), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Creswell JW and Plano Clark VL (2011) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  19. Crossan MM, Lane HW and White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review 24 (3), 522–537.Google Scholar
  20. Crossan MM, Maurer CC and White RE (2011) Reflections on the 2009 AMR decade award: do we have a theory of organizational learning? Academy of Management Review 36 (3), 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davenport TH, Thomas RJ and Cantrell S (2002) The mysterious art and science of knowledge-worker performance. MIT Sloan Management Review 44 (1), 23–30.Google Scholar
  22. Dyba T and Dingsoyr T (2008) Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Information and Software Technology 50 (9–10), 833–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Earthy J (1999) Usability Maturity Model: Processes; Information Engineering Usability Support Centres 2.2, URL: (accessed 29 November 2013).
  24. Eraut M (2004) Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education 26 (2), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eurostat (2008) NACE Rev. 2 Introductory Guidelines. [WWW document] (accessed 17 November 2013).
  26. Fetterman DM (1999) Ethnography Step by Step, 2nd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Fischer G et al (2001) Seeding, evolutionary growth and reseeding: the incremental development of collaborative design environments. In Coordination Theory and Collaboration Technology (Olson GM, Malone TW and Smith JB, Eds), pp 447–472, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  28. Gopalakrishnan S and Damanpour F (1997) A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science 25 (1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gray PH (2001) A problem-solving perspective on knowledge management practices. Decision Support Systems 31 (1), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gulati R (1999) Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 20 (5), 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gundecha P and Liu H (2012) Mining social media: a brief introduction. In INFORMS TutORials in Operations Research. Vol. 9, (Mirchandani P, Ed), pp 1–17, INFORMS, Hanover, MD.Google Scholar
  32. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ and Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. A Global Perspective. 7th edition, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  33. Harper RHR (2000) The organisation in ethnography: a discussion of ethnographic fieldwork programs in CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 9 (2), 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J and Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly 28 (1), 75–105.Google Scholar
  35. Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science 2 (1), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Humphrey W, Pomeroy-Huff M, Coannon R and Seburn M (2005) The personal software process (PSP) body of knowledge 1.0. Software Engineering Institute, (accessed 29 November 2013).
  37. Kaplan AM and Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons 53 (1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klein H and Myers MD (1999) Set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly 23 (1), 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kohlegger M, Maier R and Thalmann S (2009) Understanding maturity models. Results of a structured content analysis. In Proceedings of the I-KNOW’09 9th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, Verlag der TU Graz, Graz.Google Scholar
  40. Lave J and Wenger EC (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewin K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics: concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations 1 (1), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyles MA and Schwenk CR (1992) Top management, strategy and organizational knowledge structures. Journal of Management Studies 29 (2), 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li Y and Kettinger WJ (2006) An evolutionary information processing theory of knowledge creation. Journal of the Association of Information Systems 7 (9), 593–617.Google Scholar
  44. Maier R (2007) Knowledge Management Systems. Information and Communication Technologies for Knowledge Management, 3rd edn, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  45. Maier R and Schmidt A (2007) Characterizing knowledge maturing. A conceptual process model for integrating e-learning and knowledge management. In Proceedings of the WM 2007. 4th Conference on Professional Knowledge Management. Experiences and Visions, GITO, Potsdam.Google Scholar
  46. Maier R and Thalmann S (2012) Collaborative ethnography for information systems research – studying knowledge work practices and designing supportive information systems. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 17 (2), 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Matusik SF and Hill CWL (1998) The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 (4), 680–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Millen DR (2000) Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp 280–286, ACM Press, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Nissen ME (2002) An Extended Model of Knowledge-Flow Dynamics. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 8, Article 18, 251–266.Google Scholar
  51. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5 (1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nonaka I and Konno N (1998) The concept of ‘ba’: building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review 40 (3), 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Nonaka I and Toyama R (2003) The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 1 (1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nonaka I, von Krogh G and Voelpel S (2006) Organizational knowledge creation theory: evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies 27 (8), 1179–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  57. Piaget J (1977) The Development of Thought: Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. Viking, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Popper KR (1972) Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Clarendon Press, London.Google Scholar
  59. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  60. Rosendaal B (2006) Learning cycles in knowledge-intensive organisations: an exploratory study of the nature and dimensions of knowledge development in four departments. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 4 (4), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Salisbury M (2008) A framework for collaborative knowledge creation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 6 (3), 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schmidt A (2005) Knowledge maturing and the continuity of context as a unifying concept for integrating knowledge management and e-Learning. In Proceedings of the I-KNOW’05 5th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, Verlag der TU Graz, Graz.Google Scholar
  63. Schmidt A and Braun S (2006) Context-aware workplace learning support: concepts, experiences, and remaining challenges. In: Proceedings of ECTEL’06 – European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning (Nejdl W and Tochtermann K, Eds) LNCS, Vol. 4227, pp. 518–524, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  64. SEI (Software Engineering Institute). (2012) Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI). Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA [WWW document] (accessed 17 November 2013).
  65. Stehr N (1992) Practical Knowledge: Applying the Social Sciences. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  66. Stein EW and Zwass V (1995) Actualizing organizational memory with information systems. Information Systems Research 6 (2), 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Storck J and Hill PA (2000) Knowledge diffusion through ‘strategic communities’. Sloan Management Review 41 (2), 63–74.Google Scholar
  68. Sveiby K-E (1997) The New Organisational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. Berrett Koehler, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  69. Swenson KD (2010) Mastering the Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done. Meghan Kieffer Press, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  70. Tuomi I (1999) Corporate Knowledge: Theory and Practice of Intelligent Organisations. Metaxis, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  71. Viller S and Sommerville I (2000) Ethnographically informed analysis for software engineers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53 (1), 169–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Von Krogh G, Nonaka I and Rechsteiner L (2012) Leadership in organizational knowledge creation: a review and framework. Journal of Management Studies 49 (1), 240–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walsham G (2006) Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems 15 (3), 320–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wenger E, McDermott R and Snyder W (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  75. Wiig KM (1999) What future knowledge management users may expect. Journal of Knowledge Management 3 (2), 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yang C-W, Fang S-C and Lin JL (2010) Organisational knowledge creation strategies: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Information Management 30 (3), 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zander U and Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organization Science 6 (1), 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management, University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.Karlsruhe University of Applied SciencesKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations