Knowledge Management Research & Practice

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 443–453

Learning, innovation and firm performance: knowledge management in small firms

  • Banjo Roxas
  • Martina Battisti
  • David Deakins
Article

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationships between managerial learning as a facet of knowledge absorption (KA), firm innovation as a facet of knowledge exploitation (KE), and performance of small firms (i.e., firms with fewer than 50 employees). It builds on the knowledge-based view of the firm and the upper echelons theory to describe the effects of KA on KE, and that of KE on firm performance, in the small-firm context. Using survey data of 1441 small firms in New Zealand, the study applies a partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling to test the main hypotheses of the study. The main findings show the positive and significant effects of three types of managerial learning, namely, practice-based, proximal, and distal learning, on innovation and on innovation in firm performance. However, the curvilinear relationships suggest rather that the effects are finite and, potentially, confounded by factors unaccounted for in the models.

Keywords

knowledge absorption knowledge exploitation performance small business 

References

  1. Anderson J and Gerbing D (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreeva T and Kianto A (2011) Knowledge processes, knowledge-intensity and innovation: a moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management 15 (6), 1016–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagozzi R, Yi Y and Phillips L (1991) Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (3), 421–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney JB, Wright M and Ketchen Jr DJ (2001) The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. Journal of Management 27 (6), 625–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartholomew S and Smith A (2006) Improving survey response rates from chief executive officers in small firms: the importance of social networks. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30 (1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown B (1968) Delphi Process: A Methodology Used for the Elicitation of Opinion Experts. RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Brown T (2006) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford Press, London.Google Scholar
  9. Calantone R, Cavusgil ST and Zhao Y (2002) Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management 31 (6), 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cameron A and Massey C (1999) Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A New Zealand Perspective. Longman, Auckland.Google Scholar
  11. Cantu L, Criado J and Criado A (2009) Generation and transfer of knowledge in IT-related SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management 13 (5), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter M and Fredrickson J (2001) Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal 44 (3), 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castanias R and Helfat C (2001) The managerial rents model: theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Management 27 (6), 661–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavana R, Delahaye B and Sekaran U (2001) Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Wiley, Milton, Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Chen CJ and Huang JW (2009) Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance – the mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research 62 (1), 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1), 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen W and Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Craighead C, Hult GT and Ketchen Jr DJ (2009) The effects of innovation – cost strategy, knowledge and action in the supply chain performance. Journal of Operations Management 27 (5), 405–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal 34 (3), 555–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Damanpour F and Evan W (1984) Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of ‘organizational lag’. Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (3), 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Darroch J (2005) Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management 9 (3), 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deakins D, Battisti M, Coetzer A and Roxas H (2012) Predicting management development and learning behaviour in New Zealand SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 13 (1), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deshpande R, Farley J and Webster FJ (1993) Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing 57 (1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Desouza K and Awazu Y (2006) Knowledge Management at SMEs: five peculiarities. Journal of Knowledge Management 10 (1), 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diaz-Diaz N, Aguiar-Diaz I and DeSaa-Perez P (2008) The effect of technological knowledge assets on performance: the innovation choice in Spanish firms. Research Policy 37 (9), 1515–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dillman DA (2007) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  27. Edvardsson I (2006) Knowledge management in SMEs: the case of Icelandic firms. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 4 (4), 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fornell C and Larcker FD (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gibcus P, Vermeulen P and De Jong J (2009) Strategic decision-making in small firms: a taxonomy of small business owners. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 7 (1), 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grant RM (1996a) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7 (4), 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grant RM (1996b) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grant R (1997) The knowledge-based view of the firm: implications for management practice. Long Range Planning 30 (3), 450–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hage J (1999) Organizational innovation and organizational change. Annual Review of Sociology 25, 597–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hambrick D (2007) Upper echelons theory: an update. Academy of Management Review 32 (2), 334–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hambrick D and Mason P (1984) Upper echelons: the organisation as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9 (2), 193–206.Google Scholar
  36. Harman HH (1976) Modern Factor Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  37. Hult GT, Hurley R and Knight G (2004) Innovativeness: its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management 33 (5), 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Karami A, Analoui F and Kakabadse N (2006) The CEOs' characteristics and their strategy development in the UK SME sector: an empirical study. Journal of Management Development 25 (4), 316–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knight G and Cavusgil S (2004) Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies 35 (2), 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kock N (2011) WarpPLS 2.0 User Manual. ScriptWarp Systems, Laredo, TX.Google Scholar
  41. Kogut B and Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3 (3), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Linstone H and Turoff M (1975) The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  43. Lucas L (2010) The evolution of organizations and the development of appropriate knowledge structures. Journal of Knowledge Management 14 (2), 190–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lumpkin GT and Dess G (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review 21 (1), 135–173.Google Scholar
  45. MacKinnon D, Cumbers A and Chapman K (2002) Learning, innovation, and regional development: a critical appraisal of recent debates. Progress in Human Geography 26 (3), 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martín-de-Castro G, Delgado-Verde M, Navas-López JE and López-Sáez P (2011) Towards ‘An intellectual capital-based view of the firm’: origins and nature. Journal of Business Ethics 98 (4), 649–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McLaughlin S, Paton R and Macbeth D (2008) Barrier impact on organizational learning within complex organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management 12 (2), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mejri K and Umemoto K (2010) Small‐ and medium-sized enterprise internationalisation: towards the knowledge-based view. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 8 (2), 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moustaghfir K (2009) How knowledge assets lead to a sustainable competitive advantage: are organizational capabilities a missing link? Knowledge Management Research and Practice 7 (4), 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Netemeyer R, Bearden W and Sharma S (2003) Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Newbert S (2006) Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal 28 (2), 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organisation Science 5 (1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nonaka I and Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  54. Nonaka I, Toyama R and Nagata A (2000) A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. OECD (2005) OECD Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) and Entrepreneurship Outlook. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
  56. Quintane E, Casselman RM, Reiche BS and Nylund P (2011) Innovation as a knowledge-based outcome. Journal of Knowledge Management 15 (6), 928–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ringel-Bickelmaier C and Ringel M (2010) Knowledge management in international organisations. Journal of Knowledge Management 14 (4), 524–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rogelberg SG and Stanton JM (2007) Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organizational Research Methods 10 (2), 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rosenbusch N, Brinckmann J and Bausch A (2011) Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing 26 (4), 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Snowden D (2003) Innovation as an objective of knowledge management, Part I: the landscape of management. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 1 (2), 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Spender JC (1996) Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thornhill S (2006) Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low- technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing 21 (5), 687–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tseng C, Pai D and Hung C (2011) Knowledge absorptive capacity, and innovation performance in KIBS. Journal of Knowledge Management 15 (6), 971–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Venkatraman N (1989) Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science 35 (8), 942–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wang C and Han Y (2011) Linking properties of knowledge with innovation performance: the moderate role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management 15 (5), 802–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5 (2), 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wong K and Aspinwall E (2004) Characterizing knowledge management in the small business environment. Journal of Knowledge Management 8 (3), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zack M, McKeen J and Singh S (2009) Knowledge management and organizational performance: an exploratory analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management 13 (6), 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zahra S and George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27 (2), 185–203.Google Scholar
  70. Zaltman G, Duncan R and Holbek J (1973) Innovations and Organisations. Wiley, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Banjo Roxas
    • 1
  • Martina Battisti
    • 2
  • David Deakins
    • 2
  1. 1.Deakin UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.Massey UniversityNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations