The world wide web of research and access to knowledge
- 59 Downloads
This paper examines the shift to online knowledge in research. In recent years there has been a major transformation in how formal and informal science communication is disseminated by electronic means. At the same time, researchers’ practices in accessing knowledge and information have changed, particularly in the use of search engines and digitized resources apart from traditional journals. While we still know little about how this affects the nature of research, particularly in light of disciplinary differences, we reject here the idea that the simple growth of outputs and proliferation of outputs also leads straightforwardly to a richer and more diverse information and knowledge environment. Instead, we argue that gatekeepers such as search engines which shape online visibility, combined with competition for limited attention space at the leading edge of research, leads to a different model of how access to knowledge and information is being shaped.
Keywordse-Research scholarly communication disciplines knowledge and information knowledge creation knowledge dissemination socio-technical systems
- Anderson C (2006) The Long Tail: How Endless Choice Is Creating Unlimited Demand. Random House Business Books, London.Google Scholar
- Anderson C. (2008) The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired Magazine, 16 July. [WWW document] http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory (accessed 27 June 2008).
- Arms WY and Larson RL (2007) The Future of Scholarly Communication: Building the Infrastructure for Cyberscholarship. National Science Foundation and the Joint Information Systems Committee, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Atkins DE, Droegemeier KK, Feldman SI, Garcia-Molina H, Klein ML, Messerschmitt DG, Messina P, Ostriker JP and Wright MH (2003) Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Berman FD and Brady HE (2005) Final Report NSF SBE-CISE Workshop on Cyberinfrastructure and the Social Sciences. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Borgman CL (2007) Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research (2008) Information behaviour of the researcher of the future. [WWW document] http://www.bl.uk/news/pdf/googlegen.pdf (accessed 16 January 2008).
- Collins R (1998) The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- de Solla Price DJ (1986) Little Science, Big Science … and Beyond. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Ginsparg P. (1996) Winners and losers in the global research village. (Invited contribution for Conference held at UNESCO HQ, Paris, 19–23 February 1996, during session Scientist's View of Electronic Publishing and Issues Raised, Wednesday 21 February 1996). [WWW document] http://arxiv.org/blurb/pg96unesco.html (accessed 17 June 2001).
- Gläser J (2003) What Internet use does and does not change in scientific communities. Science Studies 16 (1), 38–51.Google Scholar
- Hakken D (2003) The Knowledge Landscapes of Cyberspace. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
- Hallmark J (2004) Access and retrieval of recent journal articles: a comparative study of chemists and geoscientists. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 40, Article 1.Google Scholar
- Head AJ. (2007) Beyond Google: How do students conduct academic research? First Monday, 12. [WWW document] http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_8/head/index.html (accessed 31 March 2008).
- Hinds C and Kiesler SB (2002) Distributed Work. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Houghton J and Sheehan P (2006) The economic impact of enhanced access to research findings. Victoria University Centre for Strategic Economic Studies Working Paper. [WWW document] http://www.cfses.com/documents/wp23.pdf (accessed 27 March 2008).
- Meyer ET (2006) Socio-technical interaction networks: a discussion of the strengths, weaknesses and future of Kling's STIN model. In IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 223, Social Informatics: An Information Society for All? In Remembrance of Rob Kling (BERLEUR J, NUMINEM MI and IMPAGLIAZZO J, Eds), pp 37–48, Springer, Boston.Google Scholar
- Meyer ET and Dutton WH (2008) Top-down e-infrastructure meets bottom-up research innovation: fitting e-social science visions to the realities. [WWW Document] http://ssrn.com/abstract=1262211. In Proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, Edinburgh, UK.
- Meyer ET and Schroeder R (2009) Untangling the web of e-research: towards a sociology of online knowledge. Informetrics 3 (3), 246–260.Google Scholar
- Nentwich M (2003) Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet. Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, Vienna.Google Scholar
- Sathe NA, Grady JL and Giuse NB (2002) Print versus electronic journals: a preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. Journal of the Medical Library Association 90 (2), 235–243.Google Scholar
- Schneider SM and Foot KA (2005) Web sphere analysis: an approach to studying online action. In Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet (HINE C, Ed), pp 157–170, Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Schroeder R and Fry J (2007) Social science approaches to e-Science: framing an agenda. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (2), Article 11.Google Scholar
- Sellen A and Harper RHR (2001) The Myth of the Paperless Office. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Spoelstra S, O’Shea T and Kaulingfreks R (2007) Marginal competencies. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 7 (2), 282–286.Google Scholar
- Tenopir C, King DW and Bush A (2004) Medical faculty’s use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists. Journal of the Medical Library Association 92 (2), 233–241.Google Scholar
- Walsh JP and Maloney NG (2007) Collaboration structure, communication media, and problems in scientific work teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (2), Article 19.Google Scholar
- Whitley R (2000) The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar