Advertisement

Journal of Public Health Policy

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 266–277 | Cite as

Beyond black lung: Scientific evidence of health effects from coal use in electricity generation

  • Susan Buchanan
  • Erica Burt
  • Peter Orris
Original Article

Abstract

While access to electricity affects health positively, combustion of coal in power plants causes well-documented adverse health effects. We review respiratory, cardiovascular, reproductive, and neurologic health outcomes associated with exposure to coal-fired power plant emissions. We also discuss population-level health effects of coal combustion and its role in climate change. Our review of scientific studies suggests that those we present here can be used to inform energy policy.

Keywords

coal electricity generation air pollution health effects 

References

  1. Wang, L. (2002) Health Outcomes in Poor Countries and Policy Options: Empirical Findings from Demographic and Health Surveys. The World Bank. Policy Research Working Paper 2831.Google Scholar
  2. Smith, K.R. et al (2013) Energy and human health. Annual Review of Public Health 34 (2013): 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. World Health Organization. (2011) Tackling the global clean air challenge. World Health Organization News Release, 26 September, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2011/air_pollution_20110926/en/, accessed 9 May 2013.
  4. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2007) World Energy Outlook 2007: China and India Insights. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
  5. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2012) Key World Energy Statistics 2012. Paris: International Energy Agency, http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/kwes.pdf, accessed 9 May 2013.
  6. Yang, A. and Cui, Y. (2012) Global Coal Risk Assessment: Data Analysis and Market Research. Washington DC: World Resources Institute. WRI Working Paper, http://www.wri.org/publication/global-coal-risk-assessment, accessed 9 May 2013.
  7. Rabl, A. et al (2005) Externalities of Energy: Extension of Accounting Framework and Policy Applications. EC EESD. Final Report no. NENG 1-CT 2002-00609, www.externe.info/externe_2006/expoltec.pdf, accessed 9 May 2013.
  8. Rabl, A. and Spadaro, J.V. (2006) Environmental impacts and costs of energy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1076 (1): 516–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Markandya, A. and Wilkinson, P. (2007) Energy and health 2: Electricity generation and health. The Lancet 370 (9591): 979–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yi, H., Guo, X., Hao, J., Duan, L. and Li, X. (2006) Characteristics of inhalable particulate matter concentration and size distribution from powerplants in China. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 56 (9): 1243–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009) Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency. Report no. EPA/600/R-08/139 F.Google Scholar
  12. Barnett, A.G. et al (2005) Air pollution and child respiratory health: A case-crossover study in Australia and New Zealand. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 171 (11): 1272–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barraza-Villarreal, A. et al (2008) Air pollution, airway inflammation, and lung function in a cohort study of Mexico City school-children. Environmental Health Perspectives 116 (6): 832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, Y., Yang, Q., Krewski, D., Shi, Y., Burnett, R.T. and McGrail, K. (2004) Influence of relatively low level of particulate air pollution on hospitalization for COPD in elderly people. Inhalation Toxicology 16 (1): 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Hartog, J. et al (2003) Effects of fine and ultrafine particles on cardiorespiratory symptoms in elderly subjects with coronary heart disease: The ULTRA study. American Journal of Epidemiology 157 (7): 613–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2008a) Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides – Health Criteria. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency. Report no. EPA/600/R-08/047 F.Google Scholar
  17. Lu, Z. et al (2010) Sulfur dioxide emissions in China and sulfur trends in East Asia since 2000. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10 (13): 6311–6331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2008b) Integrated Science Assessment for Oxides of Nitrogen-health Criteria. Report no. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/600/R-08/071.Google Scholar
  19. World Health Organization (WHO). (2013) Global Health Observatory (GHO): Outdoor air pollution. http://www.who.int/gho/phe/outdoor_air_pollution/en/index.html, accessed Feb 2013.
  20. Lewtas, J. (2007) Air pollution combustion emissions: Characterization of causative agents and mechanisms associated with cancer, reproductive, and cardiovascular effects. Mutation Research 636 (1–3): 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu, L. et al (2013) Size-fractioned particulate air pollution and cardiovascular emergency room visits in Beijing, China. Environmental Research 121 (February 2013): 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Romieu, I. et al (2012) Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study). Research Report (Health Effects Institute) 171 (2012): 5–86.Google Scholar
  23. Srám, R.J., Binkoá, B., Dejmek, J. and Bobak, M. (2005) Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: A review of the literature. Environmental Health Perspectives 113 (4): 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gohlke, J. et al (2011) Estimating the global public health implications of electricity and coal consumption. Environmental Health Perspectives 119 (6): 821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pacyna, J., Sundseth, K., Pacyna, E. and Panasiuk, N.D. (2010) Study on Mercury Sources and Emissions and Analysis of Cost and Effectiveness of Control Measures: ‘UNEP Paragraph 29 Study’. United Nations Environment Programme. Report no. UNEP (DTIE)/Hg/INC.2/4:17.Google Scholar
  26. Lippmann, M., Cohen, B. and Schlesinger, R. (2003) Environmental Health Science: Recognition, Evaluation, and Control of Chemical and Physical Health Hazards. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. National Research Council (US). (2010) Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  28. World Health Organization (WHO). (2007) Exposure to mercury: A major public health concern. Public Health and Environment. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.Google Scholar
  29. Mahaffey, K.R., Clickner, R.P. and Bodurow, C.C. (2004) Blood organic mercury and dietary mercury intake: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 and 2000. Environmental Health Perspectives 112 (5): 562–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Diez, S., Delgado, S., Aguilera, I., Astray, J., Perez-Gomez, B. and Torrent, M. (2009) Prenatal and early childhood exposure to mercury and methylmercury in Spain, a high-fish-consumer country. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 56 (3): 615–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lam, H.S. et al (2013) Long term neurocognitive impact of low dose prenatal methylmercury exposure in Hong Kong. Environment International 54 (2013): 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Costello, A. et al (2009) Managing the health effects of climate change. Lancet 373 (9676): 1693–1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009) EPA’s endangerment finding: Health effects. December, http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/endangerment/EndangermentFinding_Health.pdf, accessed 9 May 2013.
  34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009) Technical Support Document for Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. 7 December, http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/endangerment/Endangerment_TSD.pdf, accessed 9 May 2013.
  35. Vardoulakis, S. and Heaviside, C. (eds.) (2012) Health Effects of Climate Change in the UK 2012, Current Evidence, Recommendations and Research Gaps. United Kingdom: Health Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  36. McMichael, A.J., Woodruff, R.E. and Hales, S. (2006) Climate change and human health: Present and future risks. Lancet 367 (9513): 859–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. World Health Organization. (2011) Indoor air pollution and health, Fact sheet N°292. September, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs292/en/, accessed 9 May 2013.
  38. Smith, K.R., Mehta, S. and Maeusezahl-Feuz, M. (2004) Indoor air pollution from household use of solid fuels. In: M. Ezzati, A.D. Lopez, A. Rodgers and C.J.L. Murray (eds.) Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. Volume 1. Geneva: World Health Organization, p. 1435.Google Scholar
  39. Stephens, C. and Ahern, M. (2001) Worker and Community Health Impacts Related to Mining Operations Internationally. A Rapid Review of the Literature. London, UK: Mining and Minerals for Sustainable Development. Report no. 25.Google Scholar
  40. Epstein, P.R. et al (2011) Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1219 (1): 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Machol, B. and Rizk, S. (2013) Economic value of U.S. fossil fuel electricity health impacts. Environment International 52 (2013): 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. US Environmental Protection Agency. (2011) The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act: 1990-2020; Final Report – Rev. A. Washington DC: EPA Office of Air and Radiation, http://www.epa.gov/oar/sect812/prospective2.html, accessed 9 May 2013.

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public HealthChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations