Advertisement

Journal of Public Health Policy

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 430–444 | Cite as

What the UK public believes causes obesity, and what they want to do about it: A cross-sectional study

  • Stephanie A Chambers
  • W Bruce Traill
Original Article

Abstract

Increases in the prevalence of obesity have led to calls for policy interventions in the United Kingdom. Little is known, however, about how the public explains overweight, or their support for interventions. Our research team recruited 500 adults (⩾18 years of age) across the United Kingdom to complete a cross-sectional survey asking about beliefs concerning the causes of excess weight, and support for particular policy interventions. Respondents completed questionnaires in their homes with the assistance of an interviewer. Results suggested that support for policy interventions was greatest when responsibility was attributed to factors beyond individual control, with support for child-focused interventions particularly high. The relationship is more complex than previous studies suggest, as believing in the over-availability of unhealthy foods predicted higher support for policy interventions, whereas beliefs in structural explanations, such as cost, had little influence on support. Recognition of this complexity may help to design more effective future policies to tackle obesity.

Keywords

obesity overweight opinions attribution theory intervention government 

References

  1. Department of Health. (2004) Choosing Health. London: The Stationary Office. Cm. 6374.Google Scholar
  2. Lansley, A. (2010) A new approach to public health. Speech to the UK Faculty of Public Health Conference. London, 7 July.Google Scholar
  3. The Information Centre for Health and Social Care. (2010) Lifestyle Statistics. Statistics on Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet: England, 2010. The Health and Social Care Information Centre, www.ic.nhs.uk.
  4. Ichheiser, G. (1943) Misinterpretations of personality in everyday life and the psychologist's frame of reference. Character and Personality 12: 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heider, F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Weiner, B. (2006) Social Motivation, Justice, and the Moral Emotions: An Attributional Approach. Mahwah: LEA.Google Scholar
  7. Williamson, J.B. (1974) Beliefs about the motivation of the poor and attitudes toward poverty policy. Social Problems 21: 634–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haider-Markel, D.P. and Joslyn, M.R. (2008) Beliefs about the origins of homosexuality and support for gay rights: An empirical test of attribution theory. Public Opinion Quarterly 72: 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brownell, K.D. (2005) The chronicling of obesity: Growing awareness of its social, economic, and political contexts. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 30: 955–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, W.D., Renaud, J.M. and Kamerow, D.B. (2006) News media coverage, body mass index, and public attitudes and obesity. Social Marketing Quarterly 12 (4): 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hardus, P.M., van Vuuren, C.L., Crawford, D. and Worsley, A. (2003) Public perceptions of the causes and prevention of obesity among primary school children. International Journal of Obesity 27: 1465–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Panagopoulous, C. (2006) The polls – obesity. Public Opinion Quarterly 70: 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeffery, R.W. and Utter, J. (2003) The changing environment and population obesity in the United States. Obesity Research 11: 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oliver, J.E. and Lee, T. (2005) Public opinion and the politics of obesity in America. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 30: 923–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hilbert, A., Rief, W. and Braehler, E. (2007) What determines public support of obesity prevention? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 61: 585–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Suggs, L.S. and McIntyre, C. (2011) European Union public opinion on policy measures to address childhood overweight and obesity. Journal of Public Health Policy 32: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King's Fund. (2004) Public Attitudes to Public Health Policy. London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
  18. Pulvers, K.M. et al (2004) Development of a culturally relevant body image instrument among urban African Americans. Obesity Research 12: 1641–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brownell, K.D. and Warner, K.E. (2009) The perils of ignoring history: Big tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is big food? Milbank Quarterly 87: 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ries, N.M., Rachual, C. and Caulfield, T. (2011) Newspaper reporting on legislative and policy interventions to address obesity: United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Journal of Public Health Policy 32: 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Government Office for Science. (2007) Foresight: Tackling obesities: Future choices – Project Report, 2nd edn. London: Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills.Google Scholar
  22. Mazzocchi, M., Traill, W.B. and Shogren, J.F. (2009) Fat Economics: Nutrition, Health, and Economic Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Department of Health. (2011) The Public Health Responsibility Deal. London: The Central Office of Information.Google Scholar
  24. Quinn, I. (2011) Lansley blasts mults over responsibility deal. The Grocer, 29 May.Google Scholar
  25. O'Dowd, A. (2011) Government's public health responsibility deal is met with scepticism. BMJ 342: d1702, doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1702.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Clinical & Population Sciences & EducationUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK
  2. 2.Department of Food Economics & MarketingUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations