Advertisement

Journal of Public Health Policy

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 74–87 | Cite as

Beyond idealism and realism: Canadian NGO/government relations during the negotiation of the FCTC

  • Raphael Lencucha
  • Ronald Labonté
  • Michael J Rouse
Original Article

Abstract

The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) marks a unique point in the history of global health governance. This convention produced the first legally binding treaty under the auspices of the World Health Organization. Another first was the extent to which non-governmental organizations (NGOs) participated in the negotiation process. This article explores the relationship between one group of NGOs and their respective government during the negotiation of the FCTC. Documentary analyses and 18 individual in-depth interviews were conducted with both government and NGO representatives. In contrast to the polar perspectives of idealism (NGOs as unique and autonomous) and realism (NGOs as funded arms of the government), our findings suggest that neither opposition nor conformity on the part of the NGOs characterize the relationship between the NGOs and government. While specific to the case under study (the FCTC), our findings nonetheless indicate the need for a nuanced view of the relationship between governments and NGOs, at least during the process of multilateral health policy negotiations.

Keywords

government–NGO relations global health governance international negotiations public health policy framework convention on tobacco control 

References

  1. Roemer, R, Taylor, A.L. and Lariviere, J. (2005) Origins of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control. American Journal of Public Health 95: 936–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lanord, C. (2002) A study of WHO's official relations system with nongovernmental organizations. WHO Civil Society Initiative, WHO/CSI/2002/WP4.Google Scholar
  3. Holzscheiter, A. (2005) Discourse as capability: Non-state actors’ capital in global governance. Millenium Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 723–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Raustiala, K. (1997) States, NGOs, and international environmental politics. International Studies Quarterly 41: 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kickbusch, I. (2000) The development of international health policies – Accountability intact? Social Science & Medicine 51: 979–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Josselin, D and Wallace, W. (2001) Non-state actors in world politics: A framework. In: D. Josselin and W. Wallace (eds.) Non-state Actors in World Politics. New York: Palgrave, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mathews, J.T. (1997) Power shift. Foreign Affairs 76 (1): 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jasanoff, S. (1997) NGOs and the environment: From knowledge to action. Third World Quarterly 18 (3): 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Weiss, T.G. (1999) International NGOs, global governance, and social policy in the UN system. In: T.G. Weiss (ed.) Occasional Papers on Global Social Policy. Helsinki, Finland: Stakes, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  10. Betsill, M. (2002) Environmental NGOs meet the sovereign state: The Kyoto protocol negotiations on global climate change. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 13 (1): 49–64.Google Scholar
  11. Albin, C. (1999) Can NGOs enhance the effectiveness of international negotiation? International Negotiations 4: 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Humphreys, D. (2004) Redefining the issues: NGO influence on international forest negotiations. Global Environmental Politics 4 (2): 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gordenker, L and Weiss, T.G. (1996) Pluralizing global governance: Analytical approaches and dimensions. In: T.G. Weiss and L. Gordenker (eds.) NGOs, the UN, & Global Governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 17–50.Google Scholar
  14. Bob, C. (2002) Merchants of morality. Foreign Policy 129: 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loewenson, R. (2003) Civil Society Influence on Global Health Policy. World Health Organization: Civil Society Initiative, April.Google Scholar
  16. Akukwe, C. (1998) The growing influence of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in international health: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of the Royal Society for Health 118 (2): 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kamat, S. (2004) The privatization of public interest: Theorizing NGO discourse in a neoliberal era. Review of International Political Economy 11 (1): 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nathan, S., Rotem, A. and Ritchie, J. (2002) Closing the gap: Building the capacity of non-governmental organizations as advocates for health equity. Health Promotion International 17 (1): 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Higgott, R.A, Underhill, G.R.D. and Bieler, A. (2000) Introduction: Globalisation and non-state actors. In: R.A. Higgott, G.R.D Underhill and A. Bieler (eds.) Non-state Actors and Authority in a Global System. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  20. QSR International Pty Ltd. (2008) NVivo qualitative data analysis software: Version 8.Google Scholar
  21. Yeates, N. (2002) Globalization and social policy: From global neoliberal hegemony to global political pluralism. Global Social Policy 2 (69): 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wapner, P. (2002) Defending accountability in NGOs. Chicago Journal of International Law 3 (1): 197–205.Google Scholar
  23. Archibugi, D. (2004) Cosmopolitan democracy and its critics: A review. European Journal of International Relations 10 (3): 437–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mayhew, S. (2005) Hegemony, politics and ideology: The role of legislation in NGO-Government relations in Asia. Journal of Development Studies 41 (5): 27–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Labonté, R., Schrecker, T., Packer, C. and Runnels, V. (eds.) (2009) Globalization and Health: Pathways, Evidence and Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raphael Lencucha
    • 1
  • Ronald Labonté
    • 1
  • Michael J Rouse
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Population Health, University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations