Productivity change in the water industry in England and Wales: application of the meta-Malmquist index
This paper uses a meta-Malmquist index for measuring productivity change of the water industry in England and Wales and compares this to the traditional Malmquist index. The meta-Malmquist index computes productivity change with reference to a meta-frontier, it is computationally simpler and it is circular. The analysis covers all 22 UK water companies in existence in 2007, using data over the period 1993–2007. We focus on operating expenditure in line with assessments in this field, which treat operating and capital expenditure as lacking substitutability. We find important improvements in productivity between 1993 and 2005, most of which were due to frontier shifts rather than catch up to the frontier by companies. After 2005, the productivity shows a declining trend. We further use the meta-Malmquist index to compare the productivities of companies at the same and at different points in time. This shows some interesting results relating to the productivity of each company relative to that of other companies over time, and also how the performance of each company relative to itself over 1993–2007 has evolved. The paper is grounded in the broad theory of methods for measuring productivity change, and more specifically on the use of circular Malmquist indices for that purpose. In this context, the contribution of the paper is methodological and applied. From the methodology perspective, the paper demonstrates the use of circular meta-Malmquist indices in a comparative context not only across companies but also within company across time. This type of within-company assessment using Malmquist indices has not been applied extensively and to the authors’ knowledge not to the UK water industry. From the application perspective, the paper throws light on the performance of UK water companies and assesses the potential impact of regulation on their performance. In this context, it updates the relevant literature using more recent data.
Keywordsproductivity Malmquist index DEA water companies
- Battese GE and Rao DSP (2002). Technology gap, efficiency and a stochastic metafrontier function. Int J Bus Econ 1(2): 87–93.Google Scholar
- Bottasso A and Conti M (2003). Cost inefficiency in the English and Welsh water industry: An heteroskedastic stochastic cost frontier approach. DIEM Università di Genova, mimeo.Google Scholar
- Erbetta F and Cave M (2006). Regulation and efficiency incentives: Evidence from the England and Wales water and sewerage industry. HERMES Working Paper 8.Google Scholar
- Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M and Zhang Z (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency changes in industrialised countries. Am Econ Rev 84: 66–83.Google Scholar
- Førsund FR (2002). On the circularity of the Malmquist productivity index. Working paper, Department of economics, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
- OFWAT (1999). Final determinations: Future water and sewerage charges 2000–05. November, http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/legacy/aptrix/ofwat/publish.nsf/Content/finaldeterminations.html.
- OFWAT (2004). Future water and sewerage charges 2005–10: Final determinations. December, http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/legacy/aptrix/ofwat/publish.nsf/Content/pr04fd.html.
- OFWAT (2007). RD 21/0 relative efficiency assessment 2006–07. http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/legacy/aptrix/ofwat/publish.nsf/Content/rd2107.html.
- Portela MCAS and Thanassoulis E (2008). A circular Malmquist-type index for measuring productivity. Aston Working Paper RP08-02, Aston University Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
- Portela MCAS and Thanassoulis E (2010). Malmquist-type indices in the presence of negative data: An application to bank branches. J Bank Financ. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.01.004.Google Scholar
- Ray SC and Desli E (1997). Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency changes in industrialised countries: comment. Am Econ Rev 87(5): 1033–1039.Google Scholar
- Saal D and Parker D (2004). The comparative impact of privatization and regulation on productivity growth in the English and Welsh water and sewerage industry 1985–99. Int J Regul Gov 4(2): 139–170.Google Scholar
- Saal D and Parker D (2005). Assessing the performance of water operations in the English and Welsh water industry: A panel input distance function approach. RP0502 Aston Business School Research Papers.Google Scholar
- Saal D and Reid S (2004). Estimating OPEX productivity growth in English and Welsh water and sewerage companies: 199–2003. RP0434 Aston Business School Research Papers.Google Scholar