Journal of the Operational Research Society

, Volume 61, Issue 8, pp 1302–1308 | Cite as

Preserving preference rankings under non-financial background risk

Technical Note

Abstract

We investigate the impact of a non-financial background risk 𝜀̃ on the preference rankings between two independent financial risks Open image in new window 1 and Open image in new window 2 for an expected-utility maximizer. More precisely, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the alternative (x0+ Open image in new window 1,y0+ 𝜀̃) to be preferred to (x0+ Open image in new window 2,y0+ 𝜀̃) whenever (x0+ Open image in new window 1,y0) is preferred to (x0+ Open image in new window 2,y0). Utility functions that preserve the preference rankings are fully characterized. Their practical relevance is discussed in light of recent results on the constraints for the modelling of the preference for the disaggregation of harms.

Keywords

decision analysis multivariate risks background risk disaggregation of harms risk independence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge helpful discussions and exchanges with L. Eeckhoudt, H. Schlesinger and B. Versaevel. All remaining errors are ours.

References

  1. Bleichrodt H, Crainich D and Eeckhoudt L ( 2003 ). Comorbidities and the willingness to pay for health improvements . J Public Econ 87 : 2399 – 2406 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Busch T and Hoffmann VH ( 2007 ). Emerging carbon constraints for corporate risk management . Ecol Econ 62 : 518 – 528 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chhaochharia V and Grinstein Y ( 2007 ). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of the 2002 governance rules . J Finance 62 : 1789 – 1825 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C and Schlesinger H ( 2005 ). Economic and Financial Decisions under Risk . Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ .Google Scholar
  5. Eeckhoudt L, Rey B and Schlesinger H ( 2007 ). A good sign for multivariate risk taking . Mngt Sci 53 : 117 – 124 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Epstein LG and Tanny SM ( 1980 ). Increasing generalized correlation: A definition and some economic consequences . Can J Economics 13 : 16 – 34 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fishburn PC ( 1967 ). Interdependence and additivity in multivariate, unidimensional expected utility theory . Int Econ Rev 8 : 335 – 342 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franke G, Schlesinger H and Stapleton R ( 2006 ). Multiplicative background risk . Mngt Sci 52 : 146 – 153 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gollier C ( 2001 ). The Economics of Risk and Time . MIT Press: Cambridge, MA .Google Scholar
  10. Gollier C and Schlesinger H ( 2003 ). Preserving preference rankings under background risk . Econ Lett 80 : 337 – 341 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keeney RL ( 1971 ). Utility independence and preferences for multiattributed consequences . Oper Res 19 : 875 – 893 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keeney RL ( 1973 ). Risk independence and multiattributted utility functions . Econometrica 41 : 27 – 34 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keeney RL and Raiffa H ( 1976 ). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs . Wiley: Hoboken, NJ .Google Scholar
  14. Kihlstrom R, Romer D and William S ( 1981 ). Risk aversion with random initial wealth . Econometrica 49 : 911 – 920 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leskinen P and Kangas J ( 2005 ). Rank reversals in multi-criteria decision analysis with statistical modelling of ratio-scale pairwise comparisons . J Op Res Soc 56 : 855 – 861 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mullin C and Malani A . ( 2004 ). Assessing the merits of reallocation under joint and several liability, with an application to asbestos litigation . Working Paper . Chicago Graduate School of Business .Google Scholar
  17. Nachman DC ( 1982 ). Preservation of ‘more risk averse' under expectations . J Econ Theory 28 : 361 – 368 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pollak RA ( 1967 ). Additive Von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions . Econometrica 35 : 485 – 494 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Richard S ( 1975 ). Multivariate risk aversion, utility independence and separable utility functions . Mngt Sci 22 : 12 – 21 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de Lyon – Université de Saint-Etienne–CoactisFrance
  2. 2.EMLYON Business School – CefraLyonFrance
  3. 3.ETH ZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Université de Lyon – Université Lyon 1– ISFAFrance

Personalised recommendations