Journal of the Operational Research Society

, Volume 61, Issue 7, pp 1078–1094

Articulate intervention revisited

General Paper

Abstract

Articulate Intervention by Hylton Boothroyd was published in 1978. It offered a description of OR based on experience. Boothroyd said his aim was to explore what can and cannot be meant by the idea of intelligently directing human affairs, about the place of articulating our thoughts before acting, about the place of consultants in business, industry and government, and about the place of formal methods. At the time the book was widely acclaimed by both academics and practitioners. This paper sets out the main ideas encapsulated in Articulate Intervention, examines how they stand up to more recent experience and speculates on their inherent philosophical position. It is concluded that 30 years on the ideas are still relevant today and can provide the basis of a variant of what Ulrich calls critical pragmatism.

Keywords

process of OR philosophy of OR Popper pragmatism 

References

  1. Ackoff RL ( 1979 ). Resurrecting the future of operational research . J Opl Res Soc 30 : 189 – 199 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackoff RL ( 1981 ). Creating the Corporate Future . Wiley: New York .Google Scholar
  3. Bennett P, Bryant J and Howard N ( 2001 ). Drama theory and confrontation analysis . In: Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds) . Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited . Wiley: Chichester .Google Scholar
  4. Boothroyd H ( 1974 ). On the theory of operational research . CIEBR Paper 51, University of Warwick: Coventry .Google Scholar
  5. Boothroyd H ( 1976 ). Describing operational research . In: Haley KB (ed) . Operational Research '75 . North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp . 97 – 107 .Google Scholar
  6. Boothroyd H ( 1978 ). Articulate Intervention: The Interface of Science, Mathematics and Administration . Taylor and Francis: London .Google Scholar
  7. Boothroyd H ( 1984 ). The deliberative context of systems analysis . In: Tomlinson RC and Kiss I (eds) . Rethinking the Process of Operational Research . Pergamon: Oxford, pp . 33 – 41 .Google Scholar
  8. Checkland P ( 1981 ). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice . Wiley: Chichester .Google Scholar
  9. Churchman CW ( 1971 ). The Design of Inquiring Systems . Basic Books: New York .Google Scholar
  10. Churchman CW ( 1979 ). The Systems Approach and its Enemies . Basic Books: New York .Google Scholar
  11. Conway DA ( 1980 ). Articulate intervention – An extended review . J Opl Res Soc 31 : 1111 – 1112 .Google Scholar
  12. Eden C ( 1988 ). Cognitive mapping . Eur J Opl Res 36 : 1 – 13 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eden C and Ackermann F ( 2001 ). SODA – The principles . In: Rosenhead J and Mingers J (eds) . Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited . Wiley: Chichester, pp . 21 – 42 .Google Scholar
  14. Friend J and Hickling A ( 2005 ). Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach, 3rd edn . Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford .Google Scholar
  15. Miser HJ ( 1988 ). Underlying concepts for systems and policy analysis . In: Miser HJ and Quade ES (eds) . Handbook of Systems Analysis: Volume Two – Craft Issues and Procedural Choices . Wiley: Chichester, pp . 467 – 525 .Google Scholar
  16. Miser HJ ( 1995 ). Handbook of Systems Analysis: Volume Three – Cases . Wiley: Chichester .Google Scholar
  17. Miser HJ and Quade ES ( 1985 ). Handbook of Systems Analysis: Volume One – Overview of Uses, Procedures and Practice . Wiley: Chichester .Google Scholar
  18. Miser HJ and Quade ES ( 1988 ). Handbook of Systems Analysis: Volume Two – Craft Issues and Procedural Choices . Wiley: Chichester .Google Scholar
  19. Ormerod RJ ( 1980 ). Energy models for decision making . Eur J Opl Res 5 : 366 – 377 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ormerod RJ ( 1995 ). Putting soft OR methods to work – Information systems strategy development at Sainsbury's . J Opl Res Soc 46 : 277 – 293 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ormerod RJ ( 1996 ). Information systems strategy development at Sainsbury's supermarkets using ‘soft' OR . Interfaces 26 ( 1 ): 102 – 130 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ormerod RJ ( 1997 ). The role of OR in shaping the future: Smart bits, helpful ways and things that matter . J Opl Res Soc 48 : 1045 – 1056 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ormerod RJ ( 2006 ). The history and ideas of pragmatism . J Opl Res Soc 57 : 892 – 909 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ormerod RJ ( 2009 ). The history and ideas of critical rationalism: The philosophy of Karl Popper and its relevance for OR . J Opl Res Soc 60 : 441 – 460 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ormerod RJ and McLeod J ( 1983 ). The development and use of the NCB Strategic Model . The Statistician 33 : 35 – 49 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Plackett MW, Ormerod RJ and Toft F ( 1982 ). The National Coal Board strategic model . Eur J Opl Res 10 : 351 – 360 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ravetz JR ( 1971 ). Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems . Oxford University Press: Oxford .Google Scholar
  28. Schön DA ( 1983 ). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professional Think in Action . Basic Books: New York .Google Scholar
  29. Ulrich W ( 1983 ). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy . Haupt: Bern .Google Scholar
  30. Ulrich W ( 1987 ). Critical heuristics of social systems design . Eur J Opl Res 31 : 276 – 283 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ulrich W ( 2003 ). Beyond methodology choice: Critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse . J Opl Res Soc 54 : 325 – 342 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ulrich W ( 2007 ). Philosophy for professionals: Towards critical pragmatism . J Opl Res Soc 58 : 1109 – 1117 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations